CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "A Mic Drop Firing Blanks.'" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 2023 [cartoon pending]. Permanent marker w/Adobe Photoshop color.
M. Rasheed on BitChute!
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "A Mic Drop Firing Blanks.'" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 2023 [cartoon pending]. Permanent marker w/Adobe Photoshop color.
![]() |
| Steve Harvey vs Kevin Samuels |
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "IS THIS TRUE? - The Difference Between Steve Harvey Fans versus Kevin Samuel Fans.'" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 2023 [cartoon pending]. Permanent marker w/Adobe Photoshop color.
![]() |
| Become an M. Rasheed Patreon Subscriber! |
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Fallacy of 'Skin Color Blindness.'" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 29 Apr 2023. Permanent marker w/Adobe Photoshop color.
![]() |
| Become an M. Rasheed Patreon Subscriber! |
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Why is Modern 'Progress' Indistinguishable From Regular Ole Self-Serving White Supremacy?" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 28 Apr 2023. Permanent marker w/Adobe Photoshop color.
M. Rasheed on YouTube!
M. Rasheed on BitChute!
**************************
Ashanti Ghania - That’s not everyone. Yes, marriage between a white man and a black woman is rare but it does exist: George Lucas to Melody Hobbs and David Bowie to Iman among others.
Gen X era black men abandoned black women and married outside the race in droves unless we looked like Lisa Bonet. Why can’t black women find their princes elsewhere?
Muhammad Rasheed - Ashanti wrote: "That’s not everyone."
The cartoon isn't talking about everyone, just the ones that inspired it.
Ashanti Ghania - Can you draw a distinction? Otherwise, this cartoon is very hurtful to “nervous marriages”.
Muhammad Rasheed - No.
Ashanti Ghania - Expect a backlash then. Then again, you must be used to it.
Muhammad Rasheed - It's usually triggered rage that inspires me to create.
I do not even remotely share your concerns on this topic.
Ashanti Ghania - It’s your reputation…
Muhammad Rasheed - I will die on the anti-racism hill, especially over *ANY* items merely pretending to be "progress."
Ashanti Ghania - I’ll die exposing underfunded parenting due to abandonment of black women by heat-seeking bachelors—-ESPECIALLY when in the case of reverse racism.
Muhammad Rasheed - There's no such thing as "reverse racism." That's a MAGA talking point.
All we have are attacks on the Black American Family we need to fight against. The white liberal narrative of what that fight is supposed to be has always been an anti-Black racist weapon. Our job is to learn how to stop swallowing it and reacting to it, male & female.
In the meanwhile, I'm going to viciously attack the parts I personally hate the most, with complete indifference whose tears fall from the clash.
Muhammad Rasheed - A prime Joe Louis would add Marciano to his “bum-of-the-month” checklist with zero issue. He would also embarrass a game Jack Johnson because of the evolution in sweet science skills the ‘Brown Bomber’ represented — it’s a huge chasm between the boxing skill & techniques displayed by the top fighters of Louis’ day versus the top fighters at the turn of the century; Louis would send missile-like crisp sharp bombs straight through Johnson’s ridiculously primitive guard and destroy him.
Some fans assume that Roy Jones, Jr. would lose to Louis because he was the naturally smaller man, but the real deciding factor is the fact that Roy fought with an unusual awkward style not dissimilar to Muhammad Ali’s. Ali gave the boxers of the old guard hell — they just couldn’t figure him out and combined with his physical gifts couldn’t touch him either. Ali’s performances against the great fighters of the previous older style were so dominant they were embarrassing mix-matches. Jones did the same thing to top fighters of traditional styles, with his dominance over James “Lights out” Toney being a perfect case in point.
As long as Roy Jones, Jr. stayed on the outside and kept his older-styled opponent confused & frustrated, I see no reason why he wouldn’t at least be able to take Joe Louis the distance for an impressive win.
Jack Womac - I have to respectfully disagree.No fighter in history would turn Marciano into a “bum of the month”, nor have an easy time against him Ali included.
As for Jones he was one of the most physically gifted fighters ive ever seen.But Joe Louis is a far cry from John Ruiz.Over 15 rds,Louis would catch and k.o. Jones.Respectfully.
Muhammad Rasheed - Jack wrote: “I have to respectfully disagree.”
You aren’t disagreeing based on logic/reason, but based on how you feel. An idol-worship position isn’t much of an argument.
Jack wrote: “No fighter in history would turn Marciano into a ‘bum of the month’”
Yeah? Here’s what we know for sure:
1.) In his prime, Louis made quick work of a whole bunch of fighters who were no different from how Marciano performed.
2.) Marciano came into his own during a transition era, when all the top fighters of the day were then in their waning careers and ready to retire.
Your worship of the Marciano myth is unwarranted and falls apart with minimum pushback from the facts.
Jack wrote: “nor have an easy time against him Ali included.”
Remember the famous Ali quote when he said if you even DREAMED about beating him, you’d better wake up and apologize? He was talking to your overrated Marciano bum. :P
Jack wrote: “As for Jones he was one of the most physically gifted fighters ive ever seen.But Joe Louis is a far cry from John Ruiz.Over 15 rds,Louis would catch and k.o. Jones.Respectfully.”
Both Jones and Louis were physically gifted, and I suspect that the older man in his prime would’ve had better conditioning, since the rounds were so much longer in that era. Jones’ advantage is that he’s not a conventional fighter, and Louis wasn’t equipped to deal with what Jones brought to the table. This is significant, because in Louis’ era, trainers were known for deliberately avoiding putting their fighters in the ring with anything that was unusual for the trainer themselves to deal with — they wouldn’t even allow them to fight southpaw fighters! Not that they couldn’t be trained to deal with it, but only because the trainers themselves were lazy and just didn’t want the extra work. For this reason, Jones would have confused the Brown Bomber for an early stoppage.
Jack Womac - No idol worshipping here,just stating facts. Your bias is condescending. I made a reply to your post and made it a point to let you know “no disrespect”,just my thinking as you gave yours.
Many great fighters and trainers must be under the influence of the “myth”, because they've made much stronger pro Marciano statements than I did.
Anyhow that's your opinion,Marciano an overrated bum? No problem, at all.
Muhammad Rasheed - Jack wrote: “No idol worshipping here,just stating facts.”
You don’t know what a fact is. Even though a prime Louis literally made short work of an endless stream of fighters who performed exactly the way Marciano did, you magically believe that Louis wouldn’t have done the same thing to Marciano during his prime because…
…you believe he wouldn’t. lol
That’s magical thinking based on your idol worship of the man. You didn’t even try to logic out a reasonable explanation for your disagreement. That’s what I mean by idol-worship. You didn’t provide anything for me to counter-argue, but you think you somehow “stated facts.” lol
Jack wrote: “Your bias is condescending.”
Agreed. Next time, try harder to provide value. I don’t have any respect for idol worship. It’s a sin.
Jack wrote: “I made a reply to your post and made it a point to let you know “no disrespect”,just my thinking as you gave yours.”
I’m not a pagan, so I don’t respect idol worship. If you have a better argument with actual substance to it, then please provide it.
Jack wrote: “Many great fighters and trainers must be under the influence of the ‘myth,’ because they've made much stronger pro Marciano statements than I did.”
lol Okay, then at least post one of those and try to defend it.
Jack wrote: “Anyhow that's your opinion,Marciano an overrated bum? No problem, at all.”
I explained why. If you disagree then use your words and explain why I’m wrong. Pretending to “state facts” while you conspicuously don’t state a single fact isn’t a position worthy of my respect. Try harder.
Jack Womac - You seem like your looking to argue so Ill agree that we don't agree. You want to say your right? Go ahead. You know everything about everything from boxing to religion. Im proud of you, here's a nickel.Maybe you should try your vast knowledge over on box rec .Someone there will get you your arguing fix.
PS: I dont need or want your respect that was meant for people worthy of respect
Muhammad Rasheed - Jack wrote: “You seem like your looking to argue”
I’m just requesting that you make more of an effort. Posting magical idol-worshiping beliefs isn’t the same as “stating facts.”
Plus you went out of your way to tell me you disagreed with my Answer, so you were also looking to argue, too, right?
![]() |
| Become an M. Rasheed Patreon Subscriber! |
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Stupid Kind of Financial Literacy." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 22 Apr 2023. Permanent marker w/Adobe Photoshop color.
![]() |
| Become an M. Rasheed Patreon Subscriber! |
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "How White Racists Respond to Being Called Out on Their Racism." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 18 Apr 2023. Permanent marker w/Adobe Photoshop color.
M. Rasheed on YouTube!
M. Rasheed on BitChute!
![]() |
| [cartoon pending] |
Q: What can someone say to prove they're not racist?
Murphy Barrett - Not a damned thing.
It used to be that when someone called you a racist, what they meant was that you were displaying bigotry or hatred of someone based on the color of his or her skin, or that you believed something about all members of a particular race that was unfounded.
Now when someone accuses you of racism, they don’t give a fuck what you think, they just want everyone else to think you’re racist and not listen to you. The accusation has fuckall to do with whether or not you’re actually racist.
Why do I say this? Because you get nimrods making assertions like this.
And they actually mean it when they say it. And completely miss how insulting and ironically racist their own accusation is.
So if someone accuses you of being a racist, just ignore it or tell the accuser you weigh more than a duck, so fuck off.
After all, “outing” racists is the new witch-hunt.
Muhammad Rasheed - I understand why a white man in an interracial relationship would be offended by the Griffin Tweet above, but the “minority sex servant” comment highlights a real issue of concern considering the anti-Black American history of U.S. race-relations. When all civil rights movement attempts to make the maligned Black American(ADOS) ethnic group whole were rejected by both Democrats and Republicans, but anti-miscegenation laws were lifted pretty quickly with interracial couples touted as “progress” even though the ethnic group themselves remain just as economically excluded from American life as ever.
Far from being equal in U.S. society, the power dynamic is tilted in a vicious racial caste system. So, how can a white man be in a lawful relationship with a Black American woman without violating the same moral law between correctional officer + prisoner, or teacher + pupil?
Murphy Barrett - What in the ever loving fuck is wrong with you? Why is it that “anti-racists” end up sounding so fucking much like Klanners? You’re statement is predicated on the assumption of white superiority and black inferiority. You’re comparing interracial relationships with fucking prison rape?
Slack-Man - Yes, the Loving v. Virginia case was considered landmark, But I still go with Murphy on that. Once you discover that there are people that you can't please no matter what you do, you are now free to ignore them. It quite liberating.
Let's face it, I have biracial daughters, so the point you make applies to me. Its ridiculous to even assume that anyone but my first wife had the power in our relationship. She was a woman, first and foremost! Plus, she was older than me, which is another dynamic to explore.
Now, you bring up white men and black (or brown) women). Does you power dynamic work both ways? Note that a few months ago I added my integrity test to my profile. It worth a read (its near the bottom)
Given its 2023, it ironic that we compare marriage to prison. Yes, we have abusive relationships, but we have also discovered they work both ways.
Slack-Man - Another point: I suggested we have nothing to fear from interracial relationships in “It’s Ok to Be White” space, and you would have thought I shoved a firecracker up someone's ass.
In other words, I seem to get it from both sides on this.
Muhammad Rasheed - Slack-Man wrote: “Yes, the Loving v. Virginia case was considered landmark, But I still go with Murphy on that. Once you discover that there are people that you can't please no matter what you do, you are now free to ignore them. It quite liberating.”
That’s not answering my question; it’s just saying “I don’t care what other people think about my choices.” I get that as a basic given of our society, a society that has never addressed the accrued discrimination against Black Americans(ADOS) by white America.
Slack-Man wrote: “Let's face it, I have biracial daughters, so the point you make applies to me.”
It applies to every white/black interracial relationship and the people who at least support it in principle as a form of racial progress.
Slack-Man wrote: “Its ridiculous to even assume that anyone but my first wife had the power in our relationship.”
Why is that “ridiculous” when in our modern society, Black American women are at the bottom of our socio-economic ladder while white males hold all the power & wealth? It sounds like you aren’t even trying to objectively think the issue through.
Slack-Man wrote: “She was a woman, first and foremost! Plus, she was older than me, which is another dynamic to explore.”
What matters — like the guard/prisoner and teacher/student analogy — is that the ever-present race-based power dynamic made the choice unfair at a fundamental caste system level.
Slack-Man wrote: “Now, you bring up white men and black (or brown) women).”
I only brought up the Black American former slave class ethnic group specifically.
Slack-Man wrote: “Does you power dynamic work both ways?”
Between whites and Black Americans(ADOS) in the USA? How could it? The lopsided race-relations issues that Dr. King was fighting for were never addressed — in fact, he was specifically killed to keep him from being successful in that regard. ADOS are today economically excluded from US life just as they were back then. The power dynamic has only ever been slanted in one way and the idea of it becoming ideally balanced has always made white America FURIOUS. Always.
Slack-Man wrote: “Given its 2023, it ironic that we compare marriage to prison.”
How would that be ironic considering the modern feminist movement frowns upon marriage for everybody except the homosexual community? lol
Anyway, I didn’t compare “marriage to prison.” I compared the power dynamic between whites and Black Americans to the prison guard vs prisoner power dynamic.
Slack-Man wrote: “Yes, we have abusive relationships, but we have also discovered they work both ways.”
Again, “abusive relationships” isn’t the topic of my question. I’m asking how can a white man be in a lawful relationship with a Black American woman in good faith without violating the same moral law that protects the vulnerable in a lopsided power dynamic? You appear to be attempting to deflect from my actual point. Why?
Muhammad Rasheed - Slack-Man wrote: “In other words, I seem to get it from both sides on this.”
Well, in this case you aren’t “getting it” from me; I’m merely asking a question and looking for well thought-out and intelligent response[s]. This is not an attack, although I understand the nature of the question can be uncomfortable for a demographic that has never once confronted the race issue from a candid and authentic position without getting defensive about it.
Muhammad Rasheed - Murphy wrote: “What in the ever loving fuck is wrong with you?”
My ethnic group, the American Descendants of Slavery (ADOS), suffer the ongoing effects of being politically disenfranchised and economically excluded due to generations of accrued discrimination.
Murphy wrote: “Why is it that ‘anti-racists’ end up sounding so fucking much like Klanners?”
I asked a question that basically asks white men how they justify interracial relationships with ADOS women when the power dynamic in an oppressive racial caste system environment is the same as it is between prison guard vs prisoner and teacher vs student. I didn’t scream at you about interracial relationships or demand it stop or anything similar — I just posed the question. Which part of my question “sounded like a klanner” exactly?
Murphy wrote: “You’re statement is predicated on the assumption of white superiority and black inferiority.”
No, it’s predicated on the fact of the USA’s lineage-based racial caste system that has ADOS oppressed in artificial impoverishment while whites enjoy 90% of the national household wealth. This situation exists specifically because the economic exclusion of ADOS throughout the 230 yrs of slavery and the subsequent 150 yrs of government complicit discrimination were never addressed to make my people whole. There’s been a whole lot of talking like it was sorta-kinda be addressed maybe some time in the future though, and then one day, people magically started talking like the whole thing was over and everyone was equal and whites were tired of people bringing up old stuff that made them uncomfortable. My question is predicated upon the historical fact of continuous systemic racism against my ethnic group to allow whites to live their best lives, as the kids say.
Murphy wrote: “You’re comparing interracial relationships with fucking prison rape?”
No. I’m comparing the lop-sided power dynamic we find between prison guards vs prisoners — which is so lopsided it’s legally considered rape — to the same power dynamic between the white male at the top of our economic racial caste system vs the ADOS woman as the economic bottom caste. Given this very real lopsided power dynamic, how do white males justify it while presenting the odd situation as if it is “racial progress?”
Slack-Man - Well, that a lot to unpack here. However, being that I was in an interracial marriage i can assue you that if there was a correctional officer vs inmate dynamic going on, I was the inmate.
I will have to make it clear here that my first wife was asian, not black, so I dont give you the wrong impression. On the other hand, she had “brown skin” and my black friends called her an “honorary sister.”
So I dont know if some who might “pass as black” counts, but then again rednecks dont have Tricorders that scan your DNA
Note: In most cases people tend to marry inside their social class, so a white man married to a black woman might each have colelge degrees.
I will also point out that the black man, white woman trope is well overdone, I’m wondering why its such an issue if reversed.
In my mind, interracial relationships are oprogress, and signal to our children that racism can be overcome.
But then, I do not pretend to speak for everyone.
Do guys think Asian girls are pretty?
Why are there so many White man/Asian woman couples? (this one has one of my first wife’s friends in it)
Why would a man seek out a much younger, foreign wife and bring her to the US? (as they often are, the comment section was golden)
I dont know if that covered your question or not.
Muhammad Rasheed - Slack-Man wrote: “I dont know if that covered your question or not.”
I appreciate you making the honest effort to think the topic through. I can understand why you would use the white/Asian pairing as your example, both due to the limits of personal experience as well as lack of information to pull from for the Black/White race-relations history. To me, this latter item represents a symptom of US education avoiding teaching the history of our race-relations, so the only people who really understand what we are dealing with as interconnected communities are the political activist subject matter specialists themselves. This puts the average person at a disadvantage in being able to intelligently speak on the topic, since the average American is always shocked when they discover reality is very different from watered-down caricatures of the topic we see in mass media pretending to be objective truths.
Slack-Man wrote: “I will have to make it clear here that my first wife was asian, not black, so I dont give you the wrong impression.”
Yes, the history of Black Americans(ADOS) in the USA is very different than that of the Asian communities. One group was the one enslaved and plundered to build the great wealth of the nation, wealth that has been withheld from them up into the present day, while the other is currently fully economically included in society with a powerful political force supporting them at all levels. My people can’t even pretend to have all of that, and are literally trying to build our political base back up from scratch after having been disenfranchised altogether in the last 60 yrs or so.
Slack-Man wrote: “Note: In most cases people tend to marry inside their social class, so a white man married to a black woman might each have colelge degrees.”
ADOS functions as a wealthless bottom caste community in our country—the racial wealth gap is wider now than during jim crow—while whites control 90% of the national household wealth. The tiny sliver of assimilated ADOS and their individual choices in integrated communities can’t represent the group.
Slack-Man wrote: “I will also point out that the black man, white woman trope is well overdone, I’m wondering why its such an issue if reversed.”
They are the same; they both represent a siphoning of wealth out of the ADOS community into the white community, as the few high-earning ADOS males or females, do not return to the community after they marry white spouses.
Slack-Man wrote: “In my mind, interracial relationships are oprogress, and signal to our children that racism can be overcome.”
This is the essence of my original question. The interracial relationship was added to the civil rights political agenda checklist as a point literally worth dying for, while no other item on that checklist was achieved, most notably the economic inclusion portion that would enable us to live full lives as an identity group. The fact that we remain an artificially impoverished group completely locked out of the political process by design, but interracial relations is continuously pushed in our faces as some kind of progress, kindles suspicion more than any kind of faux-hope.
***My comments were deleted from Murphy Barrett's Quora Answer***
webkilla - I mean, he compares interracial dating to prison rape when its white man + black woman.CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Peculiar Cherry-Picking of Interracial Relationships as the Only Racial Progress." Cartoon [pending]. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 2023. Permanent marker w/Adobe Photoshop color.