Friday, September 18, 2020

The Public Intellectual's Finessing of the Racism Narrative

 

Click for Artist's Description


CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Public Intellectual's Finessing of the Racism Narrative." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 18 Sep 2020. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.


________________________________
MEDIUM: Scanned pen & ink cartoon drawing w/Adobe Photoshop color.

SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


Protecting White Supremacy in the Age of Spin

 

Click for Artist's Description


CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Protecting White Supremacy in the Age of Spin." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 18 Sep 2020. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.


________________________________
MEDIUM: Scanned pen & ink cartoon drawing w/Adobe Photoshop color.

SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


Thursday, September 17, 2020

Denying Science as a Multi-Colored, Political Art Form

 

Click for Artist's Description


CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Denying Science as a Multi-Colored, Political Art Form." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 18 Sep 2020. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.


Michael L. Davis - Tell you what, I won't try to define blackness or the black experience for you, and you stop trying to define queerness or the queer experience for us. Mkay?

Muhammad Rasheed - lol

In the last couple of years, the two special interest groups who have been most rabid in their attacks against the American Descendants of Slavery political unification movement have been Black immigrants and the LGBT. So when you say that you "won't try to define blackness or the black experience" for me, it just actually looks like you're trying to give me more material to make fun of in a cartoon.

Luis Alberto Llacza - @Muhammad… I'm very curious to know your reasoning as to why that suddenly justifies what you did

Muhammad Rasheed - You'd understand if you saw Robert Townsend's "Hollywood Shuffle" movie.

Michael L. Davis - "The LGBT?"

We aren't an organization. There isn't any "the LGBT." There's no gay agenda to stop ADOS political unification. There's no historical record of that being a thing. In fact, there are plenty of times when the opposite was true, when queer and black communities worked together for mutual protection.

Luis Alberto Llacza - @Muhammad… an 80's movie that shows both the struggles of being black and the gay stereotype as jokes? seems more like a product of its time to me

Michael L. Davis - @Muhammad… you wanna cite THAT movie for informing your view on queer people? That movie that plays up harmful queer stereotypes?

The thing that bothers me about Hollywood Shuffle is the movie is all about a black man faced with the struggle of playing up harmful stereotypes for the enjoyment white audiences. And yet, it includes a bunch of harmful stereotypes about queer people, seriously undercutting its own message.

Sean Linen - @Muhammad… If this was maybe one time, I could shrug it as a bad take or maybe just general ignorance, but at this point you're really demonstrating a pattern of homophobia.

Muhammad Rasheed - Michael wrote: "you wanna cite THAT movie for informing your view on queer people?"

No. It informs my view of how white males of all sexual preferences have used mass media to "try to define blackness or the black experience" to indoctrinate the culture with nonsense at my expense.

Michael wrote: "The thing that bothers me about Hollywood Hustle..."

It's called "Hollywood Shuffle."

Muhammad Rasheed - @Sean... I'm not "homophobic" at all. I don’t have a problem critiquing other political interest groups the way I'm being critiqued by these same groups. People who interpret that as "homophobia" are wrong.

Muhammad Rasheed - Michael wrote: "The LGBT?"

Yes.

Michael wrote: "We aren't an organization."

It's an amalgamation of different political organizations that form a powerful lobby.

Michael wrote: "...when queer and black communities worked together for mutual protection."

Show me record of all the times when the LGBT lobby have advocated for Reparations and the Black Political Agenda, please. 

________________________________
MEDIUM: Scanned pen & ink cartoon drawing w/Adobe Photoshop color.

SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


The Anti-American "Law & Order" Doctrine

 

Click for Artist's Description


CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Anti-American "Law & Order" Doctrine." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 17 Sep 2020. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.


________________________________
MEDIUM: Scanned pen & ink cartoon drawing w/Adobe Photoshop color.

SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


The 'Post-Racial' Psychological Warfare Tactic

 

Click for Artist's Description


CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The 'Post-Racial' Psychological Warfare Tactic." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 17 Sep 2020. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.


Tanzy Travelista Flakes

"This is a grad school 2020 graduating class picture from HBCU University of Maryland Eastern Shore. All these people get loan forgiveness under Kamala Harris' model of tying it to attending a HBCU. It’s nonsense if it is not tied to #ADOS lineage. Only 1 Black male in the class." ~Antonio Moore [Twitter]

Thanks VP to be Kamala Harris for giving these HBCU grads loan forgiveness and helping the Black community get our credit right. Look at all the Black familes she is helping. Truly a woman for her people.

#FleecingBlackPeopleIsThisEasy #NoMoreSymbolismAndTokenism

Grace Robinson - I went to Detroit today and a part of detroit that is called Mexico city. Everything was small business and they hired their own. It was wonderful and it made me wonder why the black community didn't have this. I had to pass the black community (abandoned buildings and trash) to get there. I understand that we are owed reparations but how many years are we going to wait on something before doing something for ourselves. Why can't the black community have this? What makes us so different from the Mexicans and Arabs

Muhammad Rasheed - Here:

What We Get Wrong About Closing the Racial Wealth Gap – The Samuel DuBois Cook Center on Social Equity

Grace Robinson - Honestly I understand the racial gap between white and black. However this was a Mexican community. Only difference i see is: They work together. They black community is about self. They don't call the police. A black person will call the police faster than anything or be a snitch. That community polices their own

Muhammad Rasheed - The over-policing is part of systemic racism. When LBJ's Kerner Report revealed that the reason for all the 1960s civil unrest and riots was because of the build-up of centuries of anti-Black systemic racism and advised to finally dismantle it, the establishment decided to ignore that advice and use the "Law & Order" doctrine to forcefully supplant angry build-up of racism-triggered unrest.

Grace Robinson - Yes but if black ppl stop calling police and snitching all they would have is racial profiling. If ur smart and don't carry shit then u won't have to worry about that. It's called beat them at their own game.

Grace Robinson - I'm not saying all of this isn't true but I know they can put in place whatever but its up to us to fall in the trap.

My question is what are u doing other than fighting for the government to pay a debt to move the community to having its own prosperous community? These Mexican and Arab communities are built within 10 years. I have seen it in Richmond va. I grew up around the corner for it. Plenty of police ride around it but they police themselves and you don't see them on the news.

Here I will go first. I am good at accounting and finance. I am creating a program to teach our youth on trading, mutual funds, and buying stock. My boyfriend hires youth to teach them a trade in growing medicinal and how to flip houses.

My whole point is ok ur a mouth peice for speaking what ppl have done wrong and they should correct it, but until they do what's the plan. Are we going to be stagnant or be prosperous on our own.

Muhammad Rasheed - Grace wrote: "My question is what are u doing other..."

Other than fighting for what my ethnic group needs?

Grace Robinson - Im guessing nothing other than that. So question, if the government never gives reparations (which is what their pattern is) whats the plan? That makes our community look pathetic. Im willing to fight for reparations but in the mean time we still need to grow our community without reparations.

Muhammad Rasheed - Grace wrote: "im guessing nothing other than that."

Other than what we actually need?

Grace wrote: "So question, if the government never gives reparations (which is what their pattern is)"

The pattern is to convince us we don't need it and to convince us never to fight for what we actually need.

Grace wrote: "whats the plan?"

To keep fighting until we get what we need and not fall for the numerous efforts to get us to give up while all of our rival groups work the system to get what they need around us.

Grace wrote: "That makes our community look pathetic."

Who is "our community" when you say it? Do you mean the Black American former slave class ethnic group specifically, or the whole Black diaspora?

Grace wrote: "Im willing to fight for reparations but in the mean time we still need to grow our community without reparations."

In order to get our Reparations and Black Political Agenda from the US gov, it requires us to politically unify -- a state that was deliberately broken up during the last 50+ yrs of the "Integration" era. We'll be able to help each other out better in our day-to-day survival while we are politically unified, since that was the secret to our getting through some of the most anti-Black brutal periods of American history, but there's only so far we can get while we are still economically excluded from the nation' benefits. Our rival groups, like the hispanic communities, are economically included and have access to the capital, credit and wealth-building ownership class that we have been traditionally locked out of. We need to effectively work politics and pressure the government to committing to our demands in order to finally be fully economically included -- that's why I posted the link to the 'What Do Get Wrong About Closing the Racial Wealth Gap' so you could see what we are really dealing with.

Without the political work, we will always be stuck at the wealthless bottom caste state, since we are continuously vulnerable to further exploitation & plunder without it... any tiny pieces of wealth and land we'll be able to be scrape together will just be stolen from us... we cannot truly live and thrive without politics... politics uplifts the group, not "black business" on the artificially imposed nickel & dime levels we are dealing with.

Grace Robinson - No one is saying dont fight for reparations. Im saying build the community as u fight.

We could have a great community too while we fight.

Muhammad Rasheed - I'm pointing out that the reason we are in the position we are in today, is because we were politically disenfranchised as the primary tenet of "Integration."

It's not possible to have a great community without using politics to uplift the community. Without it, it leaves us in a state ripe for continued exploitation by predatory rival groups.

How Property Law Is Used to Appropriate Black Land

Grace Robinson - I disagree with u on that. It doesn't take politics to build other minority communities. I had an Asian friend. Her family lived with a lot of Asians in one house. They all saved every penny and came together and bought a nail salon and beauty store. No loan needed.

I was in a group that said we should all put money into purchasing land. Everyone was willing but then this lady said if I'm going to give money then I need to be partner. This started some mess.

Muhammad Rasheed - Grace wrote: "I disagree with u on that."

It looks like you're disagreeing from a false equivalency logical fallacy lens.

Grace wrote: "It doesn't take politics to build other minority communities."

Immigrant tied groups are buoyed by powerful lobbies that make sure their communities are economically uplifted in addition to their abilities to leverage their families' elite status and wealth.

Grace wrote: "I had an Asian friend. Her family lived with a lot of Asians in one house. They all saved every penny and came together and bought a nail salon and beauty store. No loan needed."

Watch that vid I linked above and compare what it demonstrates to this Asian lady's story. What they are doing is what ADOS did in the pre-Civil Rights era, but that was the same time period that represented domestic terror aggressively taking and/or destroying what we built. Our stories are not the same.

Why a housing scheme founded in racism is making a resurgence today

Grace Robinson - Im talking about the present. Put the excuses away. Continue to fight for what's right. However let's build our community again. Stop snitching and bringing the white man in our business. Let the community police itself.

Muhammad Rasheed - Grace wrote: "im talking about the present."

Anti-ADOS systemic racism is the present.

Grace wrote: "Put the excuses away."

The term "excuses" doesn't make sense in context considering we're in the middle of a war. How is an active attack based on our traditional enemy refusing to share wealth, land & rule with us just an "excuse?"

Grace wrote: "Continue to fight for what's right. However let's build our community again."

A big part of fighting for what's right is preventing our enemy from continuously sabotaging our efforts to build up our community.

The Historic Role of Police Brutality in the Black Community and African American Oppression

Grace wrote: "Stop snitching and bringing the white man in our business."

???

Are you ADOS?

Muhammad Rasheed - Grace wrote: "Let the community police itself."

Again, the so-called "law & order" doctrine is a terror campaign that is being inflicted upon the ADOS community to feed the mass incarcerate state at our expense. Your continuing to compare us to "POC/BIPOC" immigrant groups is a false equivalence fallacy.

Grace Robinson - Look let's agree to disagree. Ur not understanding what I'm saying. You're just telling me all things I agree with. I'm not raised to take stuff. If u want something for the community then get it urself. The government just like a person doesn't have to pay you back. They can choose to but u can't force them too

Muhammad Rasheed - Grace wrote: "look let's agree to disagree. Ur nit understanding what I'm saying."

I do understand, I just disagree with your position based on the facts of history and the nature of my fight.

Grace wrote: "You're just telling g me all things I agree with."

lol Then why did you say "let's agree to disagree?"

Grace wrote: "I'm nit raised to take stuff."

Hence my use of the phrase "fight for what we need" which you earlier claimed to agree with.

Grace wrote: "If u want something for the community then get it urself."

Hence the #ADOS movement pressuring the government to give us our birthright needed to uplift our community.

Grace wrote: "The government just like a person doesn't have to pay you back."

It's the government's job to provide the resources communities require to thrive. My community literally built this country and her great wealth and still pay maximum taxes while we're economically excluded. You're stubbornly seeing this issue from the eyes of my enemy. Why?

Grace wrote: "They can choose to but u can't force them too"

The point of #ADOS is to use our political capital to pressure the government into providing what we need in a fair exchange of our vote -- the same as every other group gets from my government. Your position is inherently antagonistic to ADOS. It's peculiar.

Grace Robinson - I said agree to disagree because u would rather tell me our history and all the excuses of why it can't be done. I agree we have a bad history but u cant agree that u can build the community while u fight. So again I will continue to fight and build our community. U can continue to just fight and nothing else. One is fully progress no matter the outcome of the fight for reparations. One is dependent on reparations. But hey ur way of fighting not mine. So lets agree to disagree. Lol have a good day

Muhammad Rasheed - Grace wrote: "and all the excuses of why it can't be done."

Is that how you decided to interpret "fight for what we need?" Curious. I don't think English is your first language. You seem to be having some trouble...

Grace wrote: "I agree we have a bad history but u cant agree that u can build the community while u fight."

Having my community literally tore down and/or stolen from us while we're trying to build it is our reality. You keep ignoring that reality and even referring to that deliberate sabotage as an "excuse." It's a strange position.

Grace wrote: "U can continue to just fight and nothing else."

Obviously we interpret the word "fight" differently.

Grace wrote: "One is fully progress no matter the outcome of the fight for reparations."

It's not possible to achieve "full progress" without the radical transformative politics represented by Reparations because of the nature of the 400 yrs of deliberate economic oppression of our community.

Unless "fully progress" means slavery to you.

Grace Robinson - No I interpret ur first comment and using our history as an excuse on why we can't have a community like the Mexican community

Grace Robinson - Again agree to disagree. The proof will be if those ppl who purchased that land can build a community. So until then I feel u give excuse after excuse. U aren't even doing anything to help the youth (I did ask that but again I got an excuse).

Muhammad Rasheed - Grace wrote: "...an excuse on why we can't have a community like the Mexican community"

The Mexican community is fully economically included, have a powerful lobby able to negotiate on their behalf in the Washington DC swamp and are in a political-economic position so different from ADOS' that it makes your reference a textbook false equivalency logical fallacy.

Advancing Hispanic corporate leaders from diversity into inclusion

Muhammad Rasheed - Grace wrote: "again agree to disagree."

Your disagreement position is an uninformed one.

Grace wrote: "The proof will be if those ppl who purchased that land can build a community."

Here:

The Great Land Robbery

Grace wrote: "So until then I feel u give excuse after excuse."

Your use of the term "excuse" is the verbiage of an uninformed outsider attack.

Grace wrote: "U aren't even doing anything to help the youth..."

There are numerous inner-city youth programs. Why are you repeating this falsehood?

Grace Robinson - Also another thing I just noticed is the picture isn't of normal grads these are PhD students. Most wont quality for the loan forgiveness because they will be making 125000 or more to begin with.

The undergrad and masters still look like me



Grace Robinson - Hampton University class of 2019. I hate when ppl push false propaganda.



Hampton University Celebrates the Graduating Class of 2019 : Hampton University News

Muhammad Rasheed - What's the percentage of different Black ethnic groups that make up those crowds? How many are of recent immigrant stock compared to the numbers of Black American descendants of slavery whom the HBCUs were created for?

Grace Robinson - Who's fault is that? If the hbcus are made for that why aren't ADOS going? They are going to different schools. However to entertain you. 91.9 in Hampton University 84.6 i. Howard.

If that percentage falls that's not on Kamala Harris. That is on the students going to d1 schools to perform like little monkeys for money

Muhammad Rasheed - Grace wrote: "who's fault is that?"

The immigrants were brought over specifically to erase/replace the Black American.

Grace wrote: "If the hbcus are made for that why aren't ADOS going?"

Higher education is inherently expensive as lower education quality is still segregated and leaves ADOS unprepared for higher education workloads. The debt load of higher education functions as a predatory grift scheme on ADOS lives, even though ADOS traditionally do commit to education as a way of moving up the economic ladder (see: above linked report). The system is deliberately broken as a weapon of systemic racism.

Grace wrote: "They are going to different schools."

How do you know?

Grace wrote: "However to entertain you. 91.9 in Hampton University 84.6 i. Howard."

How do you know those numbers aren't the conflated ADOS + Black immigrant numbers?

Grace wrote: "If that percentage falls that's not on Kamala Harris. That is on the students going to d1 schools to perform like little monkeys for money"

What prevents that description being applied to every school?

Grace Robinson - lol now that's funny. Hbcus get applications to go to that school. They aren't over capacity so if u have the scores and GPA u wont get denied. How many ADOS applied and were denied?

Its sad I lived in Atlanta. Where Spellman is and they aren't over capacity. They are so under capacity that the school can't afford to put AC in the dorms.

Muhammad Rasheed - I'm more interested in how many ADOS are actually able to use the formal education experience to positively change their lives compared to those the often predatory system fails.

Grace Robinson - Higher education is expensive but u know what I learned from a cpa? There are a lot of scholarships specifically for ADOS that aren't being applied for. The debt does function as a predatory gift scheme. However if u make under 125000 u can receive debt forgiveness.

I know they are going to different schools by my own experience. The athletes wanted to go to D1 schools especially for scholarships. Alot of my classmates didn't care to go to hbcus.

The number say African americans. That is what we are. There is no separate ethnicity for ados but I can tell you that it proves ur picture is false but african americans arent white.

It doesn't but if students know that hbcu is made for them but they go somewhere else then that is not Kamala Harris fault.

Its sad that tall can't be happy for anything. Im at the point that if yall do get the black community reparations u still won't be happy. Lol yall will find something else thats not right.

Muhammad Rasheed - Grace wrote: "Higher education is expensive but u know what I learned from a cpa? There are a lot of scholarships specifically for ADOS that aren't being applied for. The debt does function as a predatory gift scheme."

Hiding that info from the community would seem to go hand-in-hand with how an admitted grift scheme functions.

Grace wrote: "However if u make under 125000 u can receive debt forgiveness."

"Can" under what qualifications? Under what program?

Grace wrote: "I know they are going to different schools by my own experience."

Your logical fallacy is called "Anecdotal Logical Fallacy"

Grace wrote: "The number say African americans. That is what we are. There is no separate ethnicity for ados but I can tell you that it proves ur picture is false but african americans arent white."

The entire point of the "ADOS" designation is because Black immigrants have been using the flexible terms "African American" and "Black" to pretend to be us and conflate those numbers to give the illusion that ADOS are doing economically better than they are.

Mindy Kaling's brother: I faked being black to get into medical school

Grace wrote: "It doesn't but if students know that hbcu is made for them but they go somewhere else..."

Then it implies that the HBCUs are not the best option. During this era of fake "Post-Racial America," there are quite a few confidence tricks at play designed to exploit us while pretending we're being helped, and often led by people pretending to be on our side.

Grace wrote: "...then that is not Kamala Harris fault."

Strawman effigy. I don't care about her.

Grace wrote: "Its sad that tall can't be happy for anything."

In this case, the "anything" is the fact that we've been deliberately locked out of access to the capital, credit and wealth-building ownership class our communities need to thrive while we're being preyed upon by predatory rival groups. You're admonishing us by not being happy about this, so I'm wondering if you are ADOS or a Black immigrant. The evidence suggests the latter.

Grace wrote: "Im at the point that if yall do get the black community reparations u still won't be happy."

Well, if we get it tonight we will have to use it to undo the damage of 400 yrs of terror WHILE beating off the guaranteed legions of greed-fueled predators trying to steal a chunk of it. "Happiness" is a state that reasonably won't be immediate since we'll still have a long road ahead of us.

Grace wrote: "Lol yall will find something else thats not right."

The last major victory we scored was followed by a decade of COINTELPRO assassinations and deliberate sabotage of our communities to keep us from taking advantage of our political victory. The last major victory before THAT was sabotaged by 150 yrs of savage domestic terror.
 

________________________________
MEDIUM: Scanned pen & ink cartoon drawing w/Adobe Photoshop color.

SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!

Tuesday, September 15, 2020

The Scapegoat Buffer Class

 

Click for Artist's Description


CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Scapegoat Buffer Class." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 15 Sep 2020. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.


________________________________
MEDIUM: Scanned pen & ink cartoon drawing w/Adobe Photoshop color.

SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


Sunday, September 13, 2020

For Out of the Depths of a Vile, Sulfurous Heart, the Mouth Spews

 

Click for Artist's Description - Free Access!


CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "For Out of the Depths of a Vile, Sulfurous Heart, the Mouth Spews." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 14 Sep 2020. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.


________________________________
MEDIUM: Scanned pen & ink cartoon drawing w/Adobe Photoshop color.

SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


Projecting a 'Smart' Delusion

 

Click for Artist's Description


CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Projecting a 'Smart' Delusion." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 14 Sep 2020. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.


________________________________
MEDIUM: Scanned pen & ink cartoon drawing w/Adobe Photoshop color.

SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


Saturday, September 12, 2020

Fishing for Strictly Doctrinal Like-Minds

 

Click for Artist's Description


CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Fishing for Strictly Doctrinal Like-Minds." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 13 Sep 2020. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.


Eric Cook - Name something you were taught in church, but learned it’s not taught in the bible.

#EverythingExcept...
#SALVATIONinJESUSNameActs238 -and-
#WhoJESUSIsMttw123

Muhammad Rasheed - "Rapture."

Eric Cook - It's Bible. But, not the way most learned it.

Muhammad Rasheed - The Rapture isn't in the bible. It was invented by European theologians.

Eric Cook - European theologians created the word rapture...not the original Biblical doctrine of what the rapture is.

Muhammad Rasheed - All humans will taste death before the Last Day. There will be no "Rapture" concept before the end times trials & tribulations.

The only humans who will get to bypass The Day of Judgment and go straight to paradise are:

1) the prophets
2) martyrs
3) children who die before the age of discretion

Eric Cook - Did Enoch taste death? What about Elijah? Never pigeon hole God because of what men have taught you. You need the Holy Ghost speaking in tongues as God gives the utterance (Acts 2:38)... in order to rightly divide the Word of Truth. Bro. Rasheed you neither believe in the Holy Ghost or the gift of Salvation. Which puts us on two different levels of understanding on this topic. Unless you're willing to put down the false doctrine of Islam and believe in the God of the Bible of Abraham Isaac and Jacob. Who's name in English, is Jesus (all of Acts ch.2)...this conversation is moot.

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "Did Enoch taste death? What about Elijah?"

The prophets enjoyed special benefits due to their outstanding service in their earthy mission.

Eric wrote: "Never pigeon hole God because of what men have taught you."

lol My knowledge comes from my own study in the Word of God not from other men. I don't believe in any form of priest-craft.

Eric wrote: "You need the Holy Ghost speaking in tongues as God gives the utterance (Acts 2:38)..."

Do you want me to believe that Acts was revealed scripture of God? Based on what?

Eric wrote: "in order to rightly divide the Word of Truth."

You think Acts will enable me to do that? How?

Eric wrote: "Bro. Rasheed you neither believe in the Holy Ghost..."

I believe in the strengthening spirit of the Lord thy God. Why wouldn't I?

Eric wrote: "or the gift of Salvation."

Salvation is gifted upon those who believe in the One God who made them, do good, reject evil and repent when they mess up. I believe in this fully.

Eric wrote: "Unless you're willing to put down the false doctrine of Islam..."

Why do you believe that Al-Islam is a "false doctrine?" Based on what?

Eric wrote: "...and believe in the God of the Bible of Abraham Isaac and Jacob."

I wouldn't be a practitioner of the religion of Al-Islam if I didn't believe in the God of the bible, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (peace be upon the prophets!) since this is literally a requirement of my faith.

Eric wrote: "Who's name in English, is Jesus..."

The Christ Jesus, son of Mary (peace be upon them) was the final Hebrew prophet of God in the line of Isaac. Was it the author of Acts who told you to worship the prophet? Why do you believe this author instead of believing God and obeying His command not to worship anything other than Him?

Eric Cook - ...many words don't make you right. They just prove more of what you don't know. Just like Islam is false doctrine so is what you believe Christianity is today.

Unless you believe the the ENTIRE Bible is the unadulterated Word of God, you already err. As the Bible says, without faith it's impossible to please God. This isn't up for debate. You must be born again....as found in the book of Acts. Chapter 2 verse 38. Whether you believe it or not.

Eric Cook - Jhn 8:19 - Then said they unto him, Where is thy Father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also.

Jhn 8:24 - I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins

This is Jesus...the one you call the Christ...who is much more than any son of Mary or a mere prophet. Mary, who is also just another woman among women who just happened to be chosen to be blessed. Who also had to be born of the water and the spirit in order to receive salvation. That's in Acts.
I Tim 3:16

And without controversy (no debate) great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

So...my brother, according to the scriptures, whoever taught you is the false prophet. Again, whether you believe it or not.

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "many words don't make you right."

Do you believe that your words make you more right than mine? Why?

Eric wrote: "They just prove more of what you don't know."

I asked you many direct questions that you conspicuously ducked and ignored. If what you hold is true, why can't you defend it with logic and reason?

Eric wrote: "Just like Islam is false doctrine..."

Based on what exactly?

Eric wrote: "so is what you believe Christianity is today."

The One God said that the Christians are His people, so I have no reason to believe otherwise. You think you know what I hold, but you clearly do not. Yet you insist what I hold is "false." Why?

Eric wrote: "Unless you believe the the ENTIRE Bible is the unadulterated Word of God, you already err."

I believe in that which was confirmed & fulfilled by the revelation of the Lord thy God and reject that which God confirmed was falsehood. Just as the followers of the Christ did with what the doctors of the Law held.

Eric wrote: "As the Bible says, without faith it's impossible to please God."

Agreed.

Eric wrote: "This isn't up for debate. You must be born again....as found in the book of Acts."

Why do you believe that Acts is from God?

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "God was manifest in the flesh"

This is a blasphemy claimed by only one figure in the entire library of Abrahamic sacred scripture... claims that directly contradict everything God said before and after him. Naturally that means your Paul of Tarsus was the false prophet of legend.

Eric wrote: "So...my brother, according to the scriptures, whoever taught you is the false prophet."

According to the scriptures (Paul's writings cannot pretend to be this) you need to reject Paul's pagan taint, repent of worshiping the Christ and do it no more. Now rather than later.

Eric Cook - ...no. My words don't make me right. Which is why I reference Biblical text.

I never ducked any question but those questions dictated my answers to you. You must begin at 1st grade in order to understand college level material. Your questions are incoherent which is understandable based on your understanding of the Scripture. I don't speak on the Koran because it holds no relevance to me other than it proves also the unadulterated TRUTH of Biblical texts.

For example, the God of the Bible never called christians His people. The apostles and those that followed were first called Christians by those in Antioch. But you don't believe in Acts. So your wouldn't know this.

In order for us to reason together concerning the scriptures the foundations must be established. You have no foundation in the Word of God, therefore you must be instructed in the Word, not reasoned with.

I know ACTS and the rest of the Books of the cannon, along with the Appocryphal writings are all the inspired Word of God.

Act 24:14 - But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets:
1Co 10:11 - Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.

Eric Cook - ...Eric didn't write, " God was manifested in the flesh", Paul did under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost (the Spirit of the Almighty God)

2Ti 3:16 - All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "no. My words don't make me right. Which is why I reference Biblical text."

You believe the referenced text that make up your opinions are superior to my own that do the same. Based on what?

Eric wrote: "I never ducked any question..."

Ignoring a direct question is by definition "ducking" it.

Eric wrote: "You must begin at 1st grade in order to understand college level material."

Tell me why do you believe that the writings of Paul of Tarsus were "inspired by God" when his divine demigod doctrine directly contradicts everything that came before it?

Eric wrote: "Your questions are incoherent which is understandable based on your understanding of the Scripture."

Note that you have yet to demonstrate the 'rapture' in your text? You certainly understand enough of my argument to blatantly duck questions that make you uncomfortable.

Eric wrote: "I don't speak on the Koran because it holds no relevance to me other than it proves also the unadulterated TRUTH of Biblical texts."

You literally don't know anything about it, yet you adamantly proclaim it is false. Curious.

Eric wrote: "For example, the God of the Bible never called christians His people."

Understandable, considering the Christ was the last prophet to receive revelation during the time period.

Eric wrote: "But you don't believe in Acts."

I don't believe the writings of Paul were from God at all, to be quite precise.

Eric wrote: "You have no foundation in the Word of God..."

Sure I do, or I wouldn't be Muslim. The Islamic pillar called BELIEF IN THE BOOKS is a requirement of my salvation.

Eric wrote: "therefore you must be instructed in the Word, not reasoned with."

lol This is double-speak masquerading as intelligence. smh

Eric wrote: "I know ACTS and the rest of the Books of the cannon, along with the Appocryphal writings are all the inspired Word of a God."

How are you so sure they were ALL "inspired by God?" Based on what? The One God of Abraham is not the Author of confusion, mind you.

Eric Cook - ...when you decide to believe on the Word of God in its entirety and with sincerity, the conversation can't go any further.

Point 1...You believe Paul is a false prophet. The Bible disagrees with your assessment, teachings, etc. Until you can reconcile that disbelief within yourself your faith is only lip service. The same as your lengthy responses.

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "Eric didn't write"

lol I will say "Eric copy/pasted" when appropriate then. :)

Eric wrote: "Paul did under the inspiration of..."

Paul was only inspired by his own ambitions & lusts since he was clearly the false prophet you are looking for.

Eric wrote: "All scripture is given by inspiration of God..."

Just because it was pressed between those covers doesn't mean it came from God. Your powers of discernment have been compromised by Paul's pagan taint. Again, God is NOT the Author of confusion. His message is straight & plain and by no means would He command the believers to worship His prophet. Ever.

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "when you decide to believe on the Word of God in its entirety..."

I certainly have. Unfortunately, what you hold cannot pretend to be this.

Eric wrote: "Point 1...You believe Paul is a false prophet."

No belief required since this is manifest in his blasphemous claims. There is no god but the One God and He has no partners nor children -- God is ONE.

Eric wrote: "The Bible disagrees with your assessment..."

Clearly it doesn’t since the bulk of it commands the believers to believe that God is ONE until Paul's pagan taint mysteriously pops up.

Eric Cook - ...the constant attempt to discredit Paul, actually discredits you. Peter, the apostle who walked with Jesus could not deny Paul. But again, you don't believe the fullness of the Scripture. Until you do, your understanding will always be incomplete.

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "the constant attempt to discredit Paul..."

He discredited himself with his commitment to pagan taint.

Eric wrote: "actually discredits you."

There is no god but the One God, Supreme Creator of reality and Master of the Day of Judgment. God is ONE.

Eric wrote: "Peter, the apostle who walked with Jesus could not deny Paul."

Foolishness. All of the apostles of Jesus venomously rejected Paul's pagan taint.

Eric Cook - ...since you don't like Paul...I'll let Peter say it. Also when you write this...be sure to note... Eric Cook copy and pasted what Peter the Apostle of Christ, wrote under the INSPIRATION of the Spirit of the Almighty...about Paul;

2Pe 3:15 - And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;

2Pe 3:16 - As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction

2Pe 3:17 - Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness

2Pe 3:18 - But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and for ever. Amen

Muhammad Rasheed - Re: Second Epistle of Peter

“Most biblical scholars have concluded Peter is not the author, considering the epistle pseudepigraphical. Reasons for this include its linguistic differences from 1 Peter, its apparent use of Jude, possible allusions to 2nd-century gnosticism, encouragement in the wake of a delayed parousia, and weak external support.

“The questions of authorship and date are closely related. For Petrine authorship to be authentic, it must have been written prior to Peter's death in c. AD 65–67. The letter refers to the Pauline epistles and so must post-date at least some of them, regardless of authorship, thus a date before 60 is improbable. Further, it goes as far to name the Pauline epistles as "scripture"—the only time a New Testament work refers to another New Testament work in this way—implying that it postdates them by some time. Scholars consider the epistle to be written anywhere between c. AD 60-130, with a favour for a date between 80-90 and so contend that it is pseudepigraphical.”

__________________________

SOURCES

1) Brown, Raymond E., Introduction to the New Testament, Anchor Bible, 1997

2) Erhman, Bart. Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, 2005

3) Grant, Robert M. A Historical Introduction To The New Testament, 2010

4) Dale Martin (lecture). "24. Apocalyptic and Accommodation," 2009

5) Barton and Muddiman, Oxford Bible Commentary, 2007, pg. 1271

Muhammad Rasheed - Please note that the One God is not the Author of confusion.

Eric Cook - "God is not the author of confusion" is the first not of relevant Scripture you've dared to use, thus entire conversation. However, you sir...because of your European bible scholars...are definitely confused. Now Peter didn't write Peter, Paul is a heretic and Acts is a false book. 

All according to these "biblical scholars". And not until it's content completely discredits your previously stated positions. But...I'm the one confused??? Ok. Let's go with that.

Eric Cook - you need the Spirit of God...not commentary from the philosophies of men. But again, learning from confusion lends to your confusion. Your deficiency of understanding is clearer now, based on the sources you've decided to employ.

Muhammad Rasheed - You want me to believe that this book that was written completely by either Paul himself, or by pauline evangelicals decades, even centuries after Paul's death is the Word of God, when your own biblical scholars say otherwise.

What you hold is not what it pretends to be ACCORDING TO CHRISTIAN SCHOLARSHIP.

Eric Cook - You choose to believe what you want. I've just pointed out what is written. Believe Paul or don't. Believe Peter or don't. Believe what's been written or don't. All of these are decisions you have to make for yourself.

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "you need the Spirit of God..."

I already have this, thank you.

Eric wrote: "not commentary from the philosophies of men."

The commentaries of your own biblical scholars only confirmed what the Lord thy God revealed about your pagan-tainted book. Don't attack me for it.

Eric wrote: "But again, learning from confusion lends to your confusion."

I hold no confusion. The final scripture in the canon that I hold is the literal Word of God that you only pretend to have, taken down directly from the messenger himself and free of taint by God's mercy.

Eric wrote: "Your deficiency of understanding is clearer now, based on the sources you've decided to employ."

lol Note that these are your own people -- who believe as you do -- that you are disparaging. If the learned among the Christians themselves are confused as to the legitimacy of their own book...

...well then. lol

Eric Cook - I don't lend myself to what you purport to be Christian scholarship. As I stated before...what you consider christianity is as false a doctrine as Islam itself has proven itself to be. Both come from the bosom of Roman Catholicism. But, I'm sure your Islamic scholars have taught you otherwise. Unfortunately, history records your Islamic scholars to be liars as well. But, that's a conversation for a different day/night.

Eric Cook - lol... please ammend your note...these commentators that YOU have presented DO NOT believe as I do. As a matter of fact, biblical text warns against these writings/philosophies of men that you his so dear...

Col 2:8 - Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "I don't lend myself to what you purport to be Christian scholarship."

How convenient. Meanwhile, its "linguistic differences from 1 Peter, its apparent use of Jude, possible allusions to 2nd-century gnosticism, encouragement in the wake of a delayed parousia, and weak external support" all reveal it to be quite different from what you believe. This is fundamentally problematic.

Eric wrote: "As I stated before..."

You've stated quite a bit of falsehood before. You're quite good at it. lol

Eric wrote: "what you consider christianity is as false a doctrine..."

I consider "Christianity" to be two-fold which includes:

1) Those who profess to be followers of the message of the Christ Jesus, son of Mary (correct)

2) Those who profess to worship Jesus as a deity according to the pagan-tainted blasphemies of Paul (falsehood)

Eric wrote: "...as Islam itself has proven itself to be."

We've established in this very thread based on what you have typed alone that you don't know anything at all about Al-Islam. I know significantly more about your religion than you do about mine. I would be more careful if I were you as you're only setting yourself up for humiliation. I suggest you stick to what you actually know. lol

Eric wrote: "Both come from the bosom of Roman Catholicism."

I'm actually acquainted with a Christian who thoroughly debunked that nonsense in his own impressive scholarship:

Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness: The Truth about the Vatican and the Birth of Islam by Gary Dale Cearley

I suggest you don't go around repeating that if it is indeed truth you claim to hold dear.

Eric wrote: "But, I'm sure your Islamic scholars have taught you otherwise."

lol My knowledge comes from the Word of God, thank you. I reject priest-craft.

Eric wrote: "Unfortunately, history records your Islamic scholars to be liars as well."

Some are, certainly (are they not but men?), but fortunately the Word of God itself is pure. I suggest you release Paul's tainted version of the message and come to the pure faith of the Lord thy God that ye may receive Mercy.

Eric wrote: "But, that's a conversation for a different day/night."

lol You are woefully unprepared for such a discussion.

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "lol... please ammend your note..."

Negative.

Eric wrote: "these commentators that YOU have presented DO NOT believe as I do."

Sure they do. Do you not believe in the trinity, the divine sonship doctrine, etc., invented by Paul of Tarsus? Well, they, too, unfortunately believe the same. It's not their fault the objective scholarship about the physical texts reveals what it reveals in the literature. *shrug*

Eric wrote: "As a matter of fact, biblical text warns against these writings/philosophies of men that you his so dear..."

Trust me, I don't hold your stuff dear at all. I only believe in the portions that the One God confirm are still intact. The rest you may discard with my blessing.

Eric wrote: "Col 2:8"

You're quoting Paul again. You can stop.

Eric Cook - ...you keep using commentary of carnal men but in the same breath attempt to discredit Paul as an heretic by quoting heretics. As I stated, you have no foundation in the Scriptures. You err mightily using so-called "academics" who by their own admission are heretics and err in the word of God as mightily as you.

As Jesus stated in John...

Jhn 3:5 - Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

You err in simple precepts of the Word and count yourself as wise, while employing the precepts of foolish men.

Eric Cook - M. Rasheed wrote: “.my knowledge comes from the Word of God.”

But you have yet to prove any point you've stated by the Word of God. While simultaneously attempting to discredit every scripture given with words of men. If you can't see the clear error with this...you're lost within your own conceit.

Eric Cook - Btw...I do not believe in this "trinity". My GOD is ONE. Paul did not originate or create any doctrine based on divine sonship...both are catholic heresies...again, you continue to price your serv severe ignorance of the Scripture.

Please stop.

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "you keep using commentary of carnal men..."

These are actual Christian believers who are biblical literature scholars... the exact same class of people who translate, proof, edit and publish your copy of the book. smdh

Eric wrote: "but in the same breath attempt to discredit Paul..."

Paul discredited himself by instructing the people to worship the very human messenger which blasphemes against the One God. I'm merely pointing out the manifest error within your doctrine.

Eric wrote: "as an heretic by quoting heretics."

Are they heretics merely by pointing out that what you hold cannot pretend to be what you believe it is? Obviously that just makes them objectively pure scholars in the field and nothing more, demonstrating an impressive display of integrity considering.

Eric wrote: "As I stated, you have no foundation in the Scriptures."

Sure, I do.

Eric wrote: "You err mightily using so-called 'academics' who by their own admission are heretics and err in the word of God as mightily as you."

Did I err merely by pointing out that the findings of your very own scholars fail to confirm your slipshod beliefs? This is not my fault that your house isn't in order. I suggest you repent.

Eric wrote: "As Jesus stated in John..."

"John" was written by pauline evangelicals and cannot claim to be written by the man whose name it bears. FYI.

Eric wrote: "You err in simple precepts of the Word and count yourself as wise, while employing the precepts of foolish men."

These "foolish men" are literal biblical scholars who are the literal guardians of your lore & doctrine. Are you SURE that's the hill you're prepared to die upon? O_O

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "But you have yet to prove any point you've stated by the Word of God."

You have yet to prove that the 'rapture' concept is legitimate even in your own book. Is there a time lock on those verses or what?

Eric wrote: "While simultaneously attempting to discredit every scripture given with words of men."

These are the same class of men who translated, proofed, edited and published your book. Why are you so picky now about their findings?

Eric wrote: "If you can't see the clear error with this...you're lost within your own conceit."

You're just in denial, that's all. The sensation you're experiencing is called "cognitive dissonance."

Eric Cook - These are not Christian believers.

Paul never discredited himself. YOU don't believe him. Instead you believe carnal men purporting to be christian but who are in fact ANTI-CHRIST according to scripture.

These are not my scholars, they are yours. You're quoting them, not me.

Now of course St. John is false now but you believe in Jesus as the last prophet of God, of whom the BOOK of John writes. Wow.

These foolish men are just that...fools.

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "Btw...I do not believe in this 'trinity.'"

In this very thread you professed worship of both Jesus and the holy ghost called forth by name. Which one of the apostles denied belief when put on the spot again? Was that Peter? ;)

Eric wrote: "My GOD is ONE."

Sure. The whole "three-in-one" bamboozle. I heard it.

Eric wrote: "Paul did not originate or create any doctrine based on divine sonship..."

We know. He got it from Greco-Roman paganism, or perhaps from the Egyptians.

Eric wrote: "...both are catholic heresies..."

You're silly. Obviously the catholics built their paganism upon Paul's taint which pleased Constantine so.

Eric Cook - Again...Jesus is God. God is a Sprit. The Holy Ghost came in God's name. Jesus is the name of the Father, and the son and the Holy Ghost.

Your severe lack of understanding interprets that as three. This is clearly one. I am a son, father and business owner...but my NAME is Eric. I am ONE man that can occupy many POSITIONS. Understanding. Not interpretation.

No...Peter didn't deny the Holy Ghost...he denied knowing Jesus before Calvary.

Look...again, you are proving your ineptness of Bible. Unless you are willing to learn, why continue?

Eric Cook - ...the Silliness begins and with your severe ignorance of Scripture and ends with your arrogance in empty philosophy.

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "These are not Christian believers."

Oh? How do you figure when they likewise believe that Jesus is the son of God who died on the cross for your sins and was resurrected, etc., etc.? Because they weren’t afraid to say what was revealed right in front of their faces? Shame on you.

Eric wrote: "Paul never discredited himself."

Sure he did. Did he not instruct the people to worship the final Hebrew messenger in the line of Isaac? Well, there ya go.

Eric wrote: "YOU don't believe him."

Correct. I fear the Wrath of Abraham's Lord too much and would not dare.

Eric wrote: "Instead you believe carnal men purporting to be christian but who are in fact ANTI-CHRIST according to scripture."

The scripture's criteria also reveal your Paul to be the false prophet of legend (see: Deut. 18), so it's curious how you delight in cherry-picking these things. And how are they "carnal" when they are your fellow Christian brethren who also confess with their moths that Jesus is their lord & savior? lol

Eric wrote: "These are not my scholars, they are yours. You're quoting them, not me."

If they were Muslims then I would claim them truly, but I could not quote Muslim scholars against your broken doctrine. It is far more effective to use your own people to point out the cracks lest you dismiss the revealtion out of hand through your uninformed, kneejerk anti-Islam bias.

Eric wrote: "Now of course St. John is false..."

lol I have no reason not to believe the figure himself wasn't real in history, just that the book bearing his name was authored by someone else entirely. In fact, by several someone else’s continuing the trend revealed in the confusing mysteries surrounding 2nd Peter's authorship. 

Eric wrote: "but you believe in Jesus as the last prophet of God, of whom the BOOK of John writes. Wow."

You're being silly again. The One God confirms that the Christ Jesus, son of Mary was indeed His messenger who spoke only Truth as revealed in the Book I hold. Lost indeed I would be if I had to rely upon your confused jumble.

Eric Cook - ....repeating the same incorrect points over and over, does not make them correct. Trump uses this tactic. The scholars you keep repeating uses that tactic. You're better than that. Try something different.

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "Again...Jesus is God."

Again, there is no god but the One God and Jesus was His prophet-messenger and no more.

Eric wrote: "God is a Sprit."

God is the unseen Truth.

Eric wrote: "Your severe lack of understanding interprets that as three."

My severe rejection of blatant pagan-tainted falsehood proclaims that I don't care.

Eric wrote: "Unless you are willing to learn, why continue?"

I'm patiently waiting for you to prove the concept of 'rapture' is firmly found in your book. Anytime you're ready to post up.

Eric Cook - ...your knowledge of Scripture is severely ignorant. You soak out of ignorance. Therefore, you are operating out of that very ignorance.

When you can place SCRIPTURE in correct CONTEXT with any point you attempt to make then I'll help in your understanding of it. Otherwise, I recommend you actually READ the Bible. Your use of biblical context has been all but void during this "discussion".

Again you need to be taught. But, first you need to believe.

Muhammad Rasheed - Eric wrote: "Otherwise, I recommend you actually READ the Bible."

Already have, hence why I have zero memory of anything like the 'rapture.'

Be so kind as to point out the area where I missed it. There's a lad.

Eric wrote: "But, first you need to believe."

In Paul's version of Christianity? And buy myself a one-way ticket to hell? No thanks.

Eric Cook - M. Rasheed wrote: “Already have”

Clearly, you haven't.

Be so kind as to READ IT...that'll make you an even better lad. Now be a good little soldier and go actually pick up the Book. That's a good, youngster. Then maybe you'll actually reach the level of intelligence you obviously believe you've already attained, while simultaneously and continually displaying the opposite.

Now...Eric DID write that.

Muhammad Rasheed - lol By now it is pretty obvious that the 'rapture' isn't anywhere near the bible as I stated in the beginning... the entire concept was conjured by haughty European theologians. If you could have proven it you would have done so by now and posted it with a flourish -- instead here you sit in your humiliation.

Are you ready to yield the point?

Eric Cook - Unfortunately, we haven't gotten anywhere near the "rapture" context. What the word means and/or why its used. You were to busy showing off what you didn't know.

Which made it clear, there was no point in even going to that level of Scripture with you. A concept was created by Europeans, not the TRUTH of Scripture...bit a concept which you have produce to be very familiar in many of these false "concepts" of Scripture. I submit, if you strove to know scripture as much as you know European commentary, you'd have a much better comprehension of actual Scripture.

Muhammad Rasheed
- TRANSLATION: "The rapture isn't in the bible AT ALL."

I win.



Eric Cook - Translation...you know no Bible at all. This isn't a game. But feel free to continue playing.
 

________________________________
MEDIUM: Scanned pen & ink cartoon drawing w/Adobe Photoshop color.

SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!

Friday, September 11, 2020

The COVID-19 Bi-Partisanship Compromise

 

Click for Artist's Description


CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The COVID-19 Bi-Partisanship Compromise." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 12 Sep 2020. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.


________________________________
MEDIUM: Scanned pen & ink cartoon drawing w/Adobe Photoshop color.

SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!