Saturday, February 6, 2016

Belief in the Prophets



Artie Buckley - Egyptian Scholar Admits Temple Mount Mosque Not Sacred to Muslims

Muhammad Rasheed - Dude, why wouldn't a known site established by previous prophets of God, on the command of that same God, and known to house the Ark of the Lord, not be sacred to Muslims?

Artie Buckley - Islam is a baby religion 632ad go figure !

Muhammad Rasheed - 'Belief in the Prophets' is a major aspect of Islam. Their stories and message are vital to the doctrine. ALL of their stories have that thread running through them that represent Al-Islam. That's why God commanded us not to treat any of them different than the others.

Of COURSE the Temple where the Ark of the Lord rested should be sacred to Muslims.

Roy Allen Grabow - They built it on top of where the temple was so they couldnt build it back ,,,,,but said its where somebody said was a Flying Donkey ........ISUM Raped the Bible and took our prophets and people out an made the karon from it .......NO Saviuor No Eternal Life ,,,,,,,,,a Book of BONDAGE

Muhammad Rasheed - lol They built it where the Temple was because the site of the prophet-kings David and Solomon was sacred to Muslims, too (peace be upon them both).

In islam you will be saved by accepting the fact that there is no god but the One God of Abraham, and living your life according to that belief. There is no other salvation. Do this and the believer will receive Eternal Life in the hereafter.

I don't understand where y'all come up with your stuff. Instead of passing along nonsense, you would be best served by researching.

Artie Buckley - David according to the storyline has nothing to do with muhammed if he existed.

Muhammad Rasheed - David received revelation from the One God of Abraham, and instructed the people in scripture & wisdom. This was the mission of the prophet-messengers, which included Jesus, Jacob, Joseph, Noah, Lot, Moses... up to Muhammad, who sealed the prophet-messenger line, and whose revelation closed the canon of sacred scripture.

Artie Buckley - Prove that biblically since David and the others u mentioned surfaces first in the bible.

Muhammad Rasheed - They were all of one Brotherhood, who covenanted with the God who anointed them, the One God they all served on the very same mission. It is for this reason why the Muslim upholds the Pillar of faith known as "BELIEF IN THE PROPHETS."

We recognize that they all had the same mission, and hold none of them above any of the others. Thus why the site of David & Solomon's Temple is sacred to Muslims, too.

Muhammad Rasheed - Didn't Jesus prophesize the coming of The Comforter after him? That was Muhammad, the seal of the prophethood.

Muhammad Rasheed - Didn't Moses warn the children of Israel that if they continued to rebel against God, that a prophet would be raised up among their brethren tribe that would instill in them much envy? That was Muhammad, the last of the prophets through the line of Ismael, brother of Isaac.

Artie Buckley - But someone who can live again is more than a prophet so why is this muhammed exalted over Jesus ? Whole books are dedicated to mary and Jesus in koran how many times muhammed ? It's all about giving the arab an identity as he rose in power into Northern Africa .



Artie Buckley - U cannot prove it u just uttering lies that were told to u get some sleep !

Muhammad Rasheed - 1.) All believers will live again, Artie, if they submit to the One God that made them as did the Christ Jesus, son of Mary. To be saved is to accept the Word of God as true and live it.

2.) Muhammad is not exalted over Jesus. "Belief in the Prophets" is the Pillar of Islam that explains that they all had the same mission, and none is to be exalted over any other.

3.) God told the story of Mary and Jesus to confirm their miracles and clear them of the numerous falsehoods said about them. Muhammad's story wasn't told in the Qur'an because it wasn't needed; his job was to preach and demonstrate the Qur'an.

4.) The message of the One God is for all of mankind. The identity of the Arab is irrelevant in that sense.

Muhammad Rasheed - I can't prove it? Did I not just remind you of two well-known prophecies within your own book? How then are ye deluded away from the truth? Have a care, Artie.

Artie Buckley - My book ? Who's name is on the copyright ? I'm here to show the fraud of Islam that's all

Artie Buckley - And u didn't provide anything from the biblical text fyi

Artie Buckley - And the Arab is important to Islam u know that u can't say those prayers in English they are inefficacious in any language other than Arabic. When the Arabs conquered others they changed the language to Arabic. I just posted something related to this it happened in Egypt their language was changed from Coptic to Arabic anyone speaking any other language would be killed @islam the peaceful religion, NOT !

Muhammad Rasheed -




Muhammad Rasheed -



Muhammad Rasheed - 1.) It sounds like you are advocating for the pauline Christian doctrine over Islam. You seem offended at the idea that Muhammad would be exalted over Jesus, even though Allah does not command that.

Muhammad Rasheed - 2.) The Arab's only role was to receive the message and distribute it. That's all. There was no inherent worth in the Arab himself that made him better than any other. The Arabic language of the Qur'an's original revelation is preserved in tradition only as a protection layer to help prevent the text from being corrupted over time. I am allowed to read English translations; only my Lord can command otherwise, and you will find no such command in the Qur'an. Some individuals, and sub-doctrinal schools prefer to only read the Qur'an in the original Arabic, but that is by no means a Pillar of Faith, only their over-strict subjective preference. Even though I understand the reasons for the practice, that does not make it Islam.

Muhammad Rasheed - 3.) The politics of government does not equal the religion. What the Arab-Egyptian gov rules that falls outside of the Qur'an's direct commands does not automatically equal Islam. The idea is absurd. If the new Pope declares that it is okay to have animal sex, does that automatically mean animal sex is a Christian practice? Christianity has very specific tenets that can be traced to the book, as does Islam; the well-researched scholar can discern between the two.

No comments:

Post a Comment