Inktober 2025 by M. Rasheed

 

Muhammad Rasheed - After a lengthy hiatus caused by self-inflicted burnout (my Gag-A-Day project unwisely turned into an up to Five-A-Day project), I'm back! Since it was the inspiring fun of the 2017 Inktober challenge that originally helped me get the ball rolling on a Gag-A-Day series in the first place, I decided to use this year's Inktober to get me back into the game. Unlike the ones I did in 2017, 2018 and 2019, I decided not to do these in black-n-white, but focus on successful interpretation of the prompt as I allowed the weight of the daily art project to prime me back into my regular drawing habits. 

Even though I'm making this Blog post into the second week of the month, I actually haven't missed a day, having faithfully posted my 2025 Inktober dailies on my ArtPal, Facebook, Twitter, Patreon and Buy Me a Coffee sites (my Instagram/Threads accounts were banned-deleted by Meta for the second time in a year, so I'm letting that battle go). Personally, I feel that by Day-03 I had pretty much returned to form where I left off, and now as I get ready to conceptualize the Day-10 'Sweep' prompt as I write this, I feel very comfortable with both the challenge and my art. 

I appreciate your patience and willingness to rejoin me on my artistic journey. Peace. 🤗

Mustache (1/31)
Cartoon depicting two mustached muscle-bound fighters
battling it out on the rooftops of a city.

Weave (2/31)
Cartoon depicting a smartly-dressed ADOS couple from the late 1800s
being mocked by a trio of political/ideological rivals.

Crown (3/31)
Cartoon depicting a chess player taking his loss very poorly.

Murky (4/31)
Cartoon depicting a shark appearing out of the murky depths of a
body of water to feed on the lifeless body of a murder victim.

Deer (5/31)
Cartoon depicting a deer attacking a hunter.

Pierce (6/31)
Cartoon depicting a Confederate soldier taking
the bayonet of a Union Colored Troop soldier.

Starfish (7/31)
Cartoon depicting the dark side of a mainstream media program writer's room
as they express disdain at the black character they are obliged to acknowledge. 

Reckless (8/31)
Cartoon depicting the imagined moment leading up to
the violent viral incident.

Heavy (9/31)
Cartoon depicting a couple of hardcore pro-Reparations activists 
passing along deep & weighty knowledge to an interested individual.

Sweep (10/31)
Cartoon depicting the reporting of the Super Six World Boxing Classic
final results to the tournament's boss-of-all-bosses.

See Also:

Inktober 2025 by M. Rasheed

Inktober 2019 by M. Rasheed

Inktober 2018 by M. Rasheed

Inktober 2017 by M. Rasheed

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

Crawford vs Canelo: A Foregone Conclusion

 

Muhammad Rasheed - Statistically speaking, how well do the top level Mexican boxers do against the top level Black American boxers? 

I ask because the pro-Canelo crowd seems so SURE that he's going to defeat Crawford, but is that hope technically realistic? What are they basing this hope on outside of pure hyped up emotions?

Kevin SwitchHitz Leon - What do you mean is that hope technically realistic? So you think Canelo beating Bud is unrealistic?

And historically, blacks will trump over Mexicans. But that’s not to say Mexicans are inferior in any way. They also have great fighters and are a top 5 nation in boxing.

Muhammad Rasheed - Kevin wrote: "What do you mean is that hope technically realistic?"

Meaning that the traditional Mexican boxing style is pretty easy for the 'slick' Black American fighter to figure out, so much so that there have been many Black American boxers who made a career out of specializing in fighting only Mexican fighters.

Kevin wrote: "So you think Canelo beating Bud is unrealistic?"

No, because there's always the "puncher's chance" at play that can contribute to the high-drama of the 'Theater of the Unexpected.' I just think what's realistic is the also certainty that Bud will give a masterclass and embarrass Canelo with superior skill. Canelo is skilled, the most skilled of probably any Mexican fighter in recent years, but is the greatest Mexican fighter the same as the greatest fighter? If not, then which boxing style most often takes that top spot?

Kevin wrote: "And historically, blacks will trump over Mexicans. But that’s not to say Mexicans are inferior in any way."

I'm not talking about "inferior" in race, or any nonsense like that. I'm talking about using the formula "styles make fights" — who is most often at a clear disadvantage when two particular styles are paired against one another? Mexican fighters have proven that they struggle badly when trying to master the well-rounded folio of skills represented by the Sweet Science, and their response is generally to ignore the skillsets they don't do well in, and to mock the fighters who are good at them. That's where the "running" slur comes from—they can't perform as well at the highest level, therefore, they make fun of the people who do it in a "sour grapes" like resentment.

To me, it seems laughable that people think a motivated Crawford doesn't have a GREAT chance of winning this fight relatively easily considering the nature of the paired styles and quality of opponents.

I have Crawford taking this win.

Josh Fisher - @Muhammad... any style can beat any other style. It’s not about the style, it’s about the athletes applying that style. A fighter using the “Mexican style” can absolutely beat the “slick black American style”. Are there not any slick black Americans on Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. resume? Isn’t there already plenty of slick black fighters on Canelo’s resume that he’s beaten? Does Canelo even use the typical Mexican style? Not really.

Muhammad Rasheed - Josh wrote: "It’s not about the style, it’s about the athletes applying that style"

Here we're talking about the highest level representatives of both styles. Statistically, how do the top greatest Mexican fighters perform against the top greatest Black American fighters?

Josh wrote: "Does Canelo even use the typical Mexican style? Not really."

Canelo incorporates some defense on the inside—more than you usually see from a Mexican boxer, but does that mean he performs it well enough to frustrate Crawford? It's highly unlikely, but we'll see.

Kirk Ford - @Muhammad... THEY HAVE PRIDE IN THEIR FIGHTERS, Ain't Shit Wrong with that!! Really that's a Dumb Question!

Muhammad Rasheed - @Kirk... Trying to get a job in a Mexican gym, huh? lol #ChasingClout #BrownNoser

Kirk Ford - Why the fk, you so stupid boy, it's a True fkn Fact, them mf'ers travel the World to Support their Fighters. When is the First and Last Time you seen a Whole Section of Niggas traveling WorldWide to Support a American born Black Fighter. You DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT THE FIGHT GAME. SO STFU. And for your info, I Already work at LA/ FITNESS. AND GUESS WHAT, DUMB FK. There's LESS BLACK'S trying to Get in Shape than All other Races, and Wanta Know Why, Pride is a Mf'er. WHY You Think American Black's have the worst Heatlh, in the Country. No fkn Pride in themselves. And Bitch the Shit AIN'T Even Funny!! Niggas Got More Pride in their fkn Gym Shoes, than their Bodies, Niggas Got More Pride in their fkn Cars, than their bodies, Niggas got More Pride in their Fkn Clothes, than their bodies, Mf'er Open Your fkn Closed Eyes, and See What's Around Them Closed Ass Eyez you peepn Thru! Takes More Than a Name Change to Become a REAL BLACKMAN. FACTS AND TRUTH RULE

Muhammad Rasheed - Kirk wrote: "And Bitch the Shit AIN'T Even Funny!!"

You don't think it's funny watching you suck tacos out of Mexican ass? 🤔

It's hilarious actually, in a secondhand embarrassment kind of way. You're definitely a clown and a traitor to your own people. I hope you lose your house in gambling debts should Bud win and knock your chico's head off.

Joseph Melendez - They're basing it on the fact that he's moving up 21 lbs, are we seriously making this about race?

Muhammad Rasheed - Joseph wrote: "are we seriously making this about race?"

It's not about "race," it's about the styles traditionally preferred by both camps. One of them prefers to "stand & bang" with very weak & primitive defensive skill, while the other tends to be very well-rounded especially at the elite level, so much so that even elite Mexican boxers mock them as "runners" because they can't compete with a well-rounded elite fighter.

Joseph Melendez - @Muhammad... first off no one at that level has "very weak and primitive defense" unless you're going to make the argument that Roy Jones and Ali had "very weak and primitive defense" just because they weren't very technical and relied more on speed and unorthodox defense. Same with Foreman.

Joseph Melendez - and this is a race thing because you're judging it by "black fighters vs. Mexican fighters" and not by the individuals themselves. As I said before people have faith in Canelo mainly because of the massive jump in weight, or because they're going to ride with Canelo due to Mexico's pride in him. That's really all it is, comparing all Black fighters records against Mexican fighters makes no sense.

Muhammad Rasheed - Joseph wrote: "first off no one at that level has 'very weak and primitive defense'"

One classic example was watching how easily Tommy Hearns dismantled Duran's weak defense. No one would claim that Duran wasn't an elite, but his defense was NOTHING. Even though Duran is Panamanian, but I'm using him as an example of the type. More examples were Juan Manuel Márquez and Robert Guerrero fighting Floyd. They fought at the highest level, yet Floyd penetrated their defense easily.

Joseph wrote: "unless you're going to make the argument that Roy Jones and Ali had 'very weak and primitive defense' just because they weren't very technical and relied more on speed and unorthodox defense."

These are Black American fighters who excelled to GOAT status on pure talent and hard work, which only supports my original point. Their custom styles mimicked the slick well-rounded look in functionality, which gave Hispanic boxers trouble.

Joseph wrote: "Same with Foreman."

Foreman was primitive and underdeveloped, and relied on his punching power through much of his career.

Muhammad Rasheed - Joseph wrote: "and this is a race thing because you're judging it by 'black fighters vs. Mexican fighters' and not by the individuals themselves."

It's not a "race" thing because I said "Black American" which references the American descendants of slavery ethnic group, not other black racial groups like African and Caribbean fighters. It's not about race, but about cultural preferences between the two ethnicities. Remember during the Crawford vs Gamboa fight, when Larry Merchant asked if a fighter from a place that isn't known for producing boxers (Omaha NE) stands a realistic chance against a fighter from a place that is known for producing lots of boxers (Puerto Rico)?

Joseph wrote: "or because they're going to ride with Canelo due to Mexico's pride in him."

Is it good or bad for a bunch of people to have pride in a sportsman because he's one of them?

Joseph wrote: "That's really all it is, comparing all Black fighters records against Mexican fighters makes no sense."

It doesn't make sense because that's a strawman fallacy you made up, since I pointedly compared the two styles as performed by the elite among each group, not "all Black fighters records."

Joseph Melendez - well first of all Duran had phenomenal defense especially at lightweight so you clearly don't know what you're talking about since that is supposed to be common knowledge in boxing circles. Especially when you point to one of his absolute worst performances and not one like his performance against Iran Barkley or that masterclass of boxing that he and Hagler put on together when they fought. Even Marquez was a great defensive counter puncher, his problem is that Mayweather did it significantly better than anyone of that era.

Joseph Melendez - ok so when a black fighter doesn't do things technically proper, it's fine, but when Latino fighters focus more on body work and inside fighting then all of a sudden it's a bad thing. Just to be clear, you making the argument that their defense is primitive, is almost as mind numbingly stupid as someone saying that Mayweather's offense is primitive because he didn't throw a lot of punches after he started having hand issues. Especially when you try and say that Foreman was primitive, no one at that level is primitive in any area, no one makes it that far unless they are solid whether technically or not with their offense and defense.

Joseph Melendez - let me focus on Foreman now, there was nothing primitive about his style, he used many of the same techniques that Ali did only instead of fighting on the outside, Foreman would step in and throw thudding uppercuts and hooks. Foreman was very precise with his footing keeping his opponents off balance by pivoting and side stepping often behind them as they would charge forward causing them to lose their balance especially when he would turn or push them..

He also used his hand speed to deflect incoming punches while often changing the direction of his counter punches catching his opponents off guard and often off balance like he did to Frazier. He was a very well developed fighter, and his speed and techniques were every bit as effective as his power was. For you to sum him up the way that you did speaks to your lack of knowledge on boxing's history and the way styles are used because this stuff is well known.

Joseph Melendez - your literal statement is this "Statistically speaking, how well do the top level Mexican boxers do against the top level Black American boxers?". You weren't asking about styles and if you meant too, then you should try being specific. But to be blunt your following comments where you try to say that a guy like Duran had nothing on defense because of his race doesn't help your case. Especially when Duran's defensive prowess is pretty well known.

Muhammad Rasheed - Joseph wrote: "ok so when a black fighter doesn't do things technically proper, it's fine"

The topic of the thread is whether it is realistic to really expect an elite Mexican fighter to easily defeat an elite Black American fighter due to the fact that elite Black American fighters use a well-rounded style that easily dominates the traditional Mexican style. You brought up Ali and Roy as if they were exceptions to the rule, but their natural talent enabled them to function like slick highly-skilled boxers, which means they could basically coast on their talent and still frustrate Mexican fighters, which supported my point.

Joseph wrote: "but when Latino fighters focus more on body work and inside fighting"

They focus more on "stand & bang" to please the crowd, because the unsophisticated audience doesn't appreciate the well-rounded slick styles, especially among the Mexican fan crowd. They only want to see their own people succeed.

Joseph wrote: "Just to be clear, you making the argument that their defense is primitive"

So much so, that they universally call people who have great defensive skill "runners" for no other reason than because they can't compete at that level.

Joseph wrote: "is almost as mind numbingly stupid as someone saying that Mayweather's offense is primitive because he didn't throw a lot of punches after he started having hand issues."

The claim would be stupid because Floyd threw just enough punches to secure the win. High volume punching is only necessary if you have no clear strategy or plan.

Joseph wrote: "Especially when you try and say that Foreman was primitive"

Foreman was very primitive and underdeveloped, that's why Ali called him "The Mummy."

Joseph wrote: "no one makes it that far unless"

Foreman's great natural talent was his phenomenal punching power, which got him high enough to actually win the title. Wilder performed the same feat in his own era.

Joseph wrote: "let me focus on Foreman now, there was nothing primitive about his style"

Sorry, I have no respect for your analytical skills on these topics. You are led by your emotions, not your intellect. You obviously don't even know what you are looking at when you watch the sport.

Muhammad Rasheed - Joseph wrote: "your literal statement is this 'Statistically speaking, how well do the top level Mexican boxers do against the top level Black American boxers?.' You weren't asking about styles"

I asked to compare top level versus top level statistical performances, but you claimed I compared ALL Black fighters' records, which means you're not even paying attention to the points of the discussion. I can't take that sloppiness seriously.

Joseph wrote: "where you try to say that a guy like Duran had nothing on defense because of his race"

I said that as an elite fighter, his style's defense was so weak that a Black American elite fighter picked apart his defense easily. It sounds like we disagree as to what "race" means. When I say "Black American boxer," I'm only talking about a specific ethnic group—the American Descendants of Slavery (ADOS). I am not including African boxers or Caribbean boxers. If I mean "race" then I would have included them. This is about cultural/heritage preference, not physical "race" phenotype.

Jay To You - @Muhammad... Welp… the two Mexican legends at the top lost to good (Frank Randall, Tim Bradley respectively) and great (Pernell Whitaker whupped Chavez @$$!! Same for Floyd and Marquez.) black fighters.

The two at the bottom lost in their primes to Zahir Raheem (good slick boxer) and Junior Jones respectively. Barrera was getting outboxed by Kennedy McKinley before he KO’d him.

I hope Bud wins and he can win but that weight!!! I wish he at least made Saul sign a rehydration clause.

Muhammad Rasheed - Jay wrote: "I hope Bud wins and he can win but that weight!!!"

Give me an example of a slick and talented boxer losing to a less skilled but larger boxer just because the latter was bigger, please.

Jay To You - the most heartbreaking for a boxing lover like me would be Sugar Ray Robinson vs Joey Maxim.

Ray dropped from heat exhaustion.

Also, Michael Moorer vs Big George. George isn’t all that skilled. He was big, and he hit like a horse kicks. Mike was a highly skilled southpaw HW champ.

If you want another example: Will o the wisp Pep vs Sandy Sadler 1,3-4. Willy Pep was observably the more skilled boxer. But Sandy was a Killer with a capital K.

Muhammad Rasheed - Jay wrote: "Ray dropped from heat exhaustion."

Okay, so it wasn't Maxim overwhelming Robinson with his size, but it was a conditioning issue.

Jay wrote: "Also, Michael Moorer vs Big George. George isn’t all that skilled. He was big, and he hit like a horse kicks. Mike was a highly skilled southpaw HW champ."

Moorer was dominating the big man on pure skill. and caught George's big right hand because he was unfocused.

Jay wrote: "If you want another example"

You didn't give me any examples of what I asked for yet. I'm looking for a match where the bigger guy won because he imposed his bulk on the more skilled fighter who was never in the fight because his opponent was JUST TOO BIG. Give me an example of that.

Don Forsyth - @Muhammad... If you're that sure about it, you should bet everything you have on Bud... All the betting platforms are picking Canelo to win, so you'll get a great return, if Bud does win...
Or... Maybe every betting platform has Canelo as the favorite to win for a reason, despite your black racial superiority hypothesis.
Consider that Bud has done well throughout his career facing weaker opponents that he could manhandle, over-power, and hurt. The first time Bud faced an opponent of comparable strength, Madrimov, he struggled, and barely squeaked out a win, even though Madrimov only had 11 professional fights (and 10 wins) prior to facing Bud. So, it's fair to presume, when Bud is not the stronger man, he struggles.
Now, he is stepping up to face an opponent who is stronger than Bud, younger than Bud, has more experience in the ring and in facing world champions than Bud, and is a more active fighter than Bud, and you expect it to be an easy win for Bud????🤣🤣🤣
You're analyzing this fight as fan of Crawford, instead of being objective.
Also consider that Bud is turning 38 this month. He is at the end of his career. He has 7 kids, why would he put his life or his health at risk this close to retirement??? He's already got belts and he is going into the hall of fame, so the idea that he is doing this for legacy is laughable!
Bud knows that a fight with Canelo is the biggest possible payday he can get, so that is why he is doing it. I belive Bud is not going to risk his health here at the end of his career. I believe this is going to be a repeat of the Charlo fight (a black american fighter), Bud may engage a little at the beginning for the fans, but as soon as he gets a taste of Canelo's power, he is going into survival mode, and stay away all night, then take the loss, collect his millions and retire.
Bud will be laughing all the way to the bank, thinking about all the people who bought the hype that he was showing up to do anything more than collect a check.

Muhammad Rasheed - Don wrote: "If you're that sure about it, you should bet"

Gambling is against my religion.

Don wrote: "despite your black racial superiority hypothesis"

I don't have such a hypothesis, or I would have included African and Caribbean fighters, which I didn't.

My hypothesis is based on the "styles make fights" concept, and which style is traditionally favored by which ethnic heritage camp.

Don wrote: "The first time Bud faced an opponent of comparable strength, Madrimov, he struggled [...] when Bud is not the stronger man, he struggles."

That's a terrible take. The challenge with Madrimov was his Central Asian style was unusual, combined with the fact that he was an awkward counterpuncher. This made Crawford more cautious than usual, because he had to figure out the unique alien approach Madrimov brought. It didn't have anything to do with strength/size.

Don wrote: "and you expect it to be an easy win for Bud????🤣🤣🤣"

I sure do.

Don wrote: "You're analyzing this fight as fan of Crawford, instead of being objective."

I honestly don't think you even know what that means. You're just typing what you heard from somewhere and think it sounded good in the moment.

Don wrote: "He has 7 kids, why would he put his life or his health at risk this close to retirement???"

Because he's confident that he'll easily solve the Mexican fighter's style puzzle with zero problem. I have no reason to doubt him.

Don wrote: "I believe this is going to be a repeat of the Charlo fight (a black american fighter)"

Jermell Charlo is a lesser caliber of fighter than Bud, and has a weaker training camp. He also chickened out of a fight with Crawford, which shows he has a weak heart. He lost to Canelo because 1) he didn't put on the weight correctly and just wanted to snatch the big pay day, and 2) he believed the pro-Canelo naysayers more than he believed in himself and in his own abilities. Crawford would never have that problem.

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

The Old Trick Due for an Upgrade

 

[original toon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Old Trick Due for an Upgrade." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE  below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

**************************

Eboni (@ebonifiyah) - Learned two new terms today. ADOS (American Descendants of Slavery) and FBA (Foundation Black Americans). Both very interesting and as someone who majored (20 years ago) in Black Studies I’m super curious about both. Will be doing my research.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - As someone who only took Black Studies, no major, I suggest you do more reaearch. Look up Nativism, Black Nativism and White Nativism. It has been interesting just how long black people have been fighting with and dragging down each other. In the name of white supremacists.

Eboni (@ebonifiyah) - Sir. The suggestion that I do more research is absolutely unnecessary because my post SAID that I just learned of the terms and AM GOING TO DO MY RESEARCH

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - I know I read that and I AM AGREEING WITH YOU. How can we agree and not be hostile about agreeing

Eboni (@ebonifiyah) - Word.

I’ll reflect, as long as you do too. I will share with you how I received your reply to my message. It reeks of mansplaining when I say that I’m gonna do research and your immediate reply is that you suggest I do what I just said that I was gonna do. Happy to agree.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - Have I mentioned to you nativism white and black nativism? While Googling those terms I found that this diaspora War is 200 years old

Muhammad Rasheed - KB: "this diaspora War is 200 years old"

It's double that age since it was hostile rival African ethnic groups who sold my distant ancestors to the Dutch East India Company (VOC).

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - My guy its being created artificially by bot and troll accounts. Its an organization social mind control operations. Its been going on for 10 years now. And its only getting worse. This is how Trump is president. They are doing this all over the internet.

Muhammad Rasheed - KB: "its being created artificially by bot and troll accounts"

Oh, did they have that back in the 1600s? 🤔 When those assholes walked my people around the Tree of Forgetting?

KB: "Its an organization social mind control operations"

Said the literal red commie agent. Hypocrite much?

KB: "This is how Trump is president. They are doing this all over the internet."

Trump is POTUS because the 1% grifter class are cheating assholes. True. Has nothing to do with the ADOS movement though.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - They have them now, these fuckers have been very very busy over the last 10 years. One of the things I pay attention to is how the Black populations was manipulated post slavery, primarily in Latine America, by the planter class. They didn't use the same delivery methods. In the Dominican Republic for example media and even the school system were utilized to spread a message and ideas to manipulate. New technology offers new delivery methods for old tricks. This has been done before.

Muhammad Rasheed - What does that have to do with ADOS?

You are immigrant-tied. That means you have a vested interest in sabotaging the ADOS movement on behalf of white supremacy because they don't want the former slave class to compete fairly against them in the open free markets. Using immigrant propagandists to trick Black Americans into working against their best interests in a fake pan-africanist kumbaya is where you come in.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - The Commie message has been used since at least 1830s for example by the Nativism movement. That tactic was spread through print media. I studies those methods as well. Its taught in history courses.

Muhammad Rasheed - lol I'm sure you do, since your handlers assigned the task to you.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - 😆 your handlers use anonymous bot accounts, TBA ect, in all your social forums and pepper with with ideas beneficial to the Rhich.

Muhammad Rasheed - Rewrite that in English, please. I don't speak Yiddish.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - You should be good

Muhammad Rasheed - KB: "😆 your handlers use anonymous bot accounts"

I don't have handlers. That's your club, and interconnected affiliates, which includes Tariq's gullible FBA goons.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - I am by no means ignorant to the fact that this is not an isolated operation. Studies now show that up to 40% of the entire internet is being artificially created, bot and troll accounts. The Black community is not the only one effected. The Hispanic community was inundated with a custom message and the white evangelical community another. These are not amateurs. I only choose one of the operation I have seen to speak on. And it started before Nasheed. And its not limited to Nasheed.

Muhammad Rasheed - That means Tariq is handled by the same spy cell that you are.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - Tariq is paid and you can find he tax documents online showing it.

Muhammad Rasheed - He's no more 'paid' than any other public-facing self-hating Black agents working to sabotage his people's sacred liberation struggle efforts. The same chicken dinner deal that Sharpton & Sean Combs received for their mass media sell-out duties.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - His $ only came with the promotion of right wing ideology.

Muhammad Rasheed - I don't care. I hope he falls on his treacherous, big-assed head...

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - This is the biggest tradey for Black American in my life time so I care.

Muhammad Rasheed - Whatever you care about I don't care about.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - You are not a friend of your community, you are the enemy of it.

Muhammad Rasheed - Considering the scheming hostile outsider has been the bane of my existence for the last 400+ years, why would your own scheming hostile outsider opinion about my community matter to me?

Your entire wall is covered in posts that rehash the same red agent rhetoric from 60-years ago. You saw your N'Cobra gang just get arrested for being too casually sloppy with their Russian ties, right? This is a new era, and you are seen. Malcolm & Martin didn't understand the depths of what they were dealing with on the left, but we have the benefit of 20/20 historical analysis.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - Pan Africanism was a lot more successful for Black Americans than nativism. Black Americans learned a hard lesson during the great depression on this. And those days of economic hardship are right around the corner. Be ready. Who you think these Trumpers will short Black America, or White?

Muhammad Rasheed - KB: "Pan Africanism was a lot more successful for Black Americans"

You sound crazy as f*ck. lol Pan-Africanism is a communist scam designed to exploit ADOS. It does absolutely nothing for our group. Just because a handful of self-hating sellouts were able to we well as administrators doesn't mean the program was successful on our side.

KB: "Black Americans learned a hard lesson during the great depression on this."

Being lectured at by a white supremacy loyalist foreigner is very offputting.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - That communism dribble is propaganda used to condition you. Its a known tactic of the same white supremacy that you claim you arent influenced by, here you are trying to play me with it. My education on this wont allow you to. You been hearing that BS for 200 years now, its documented. Your argument today have been weak you rely on intelligence dampening and white supremacist propaganda. Im not the one.

Muhammad Rasheed - KB: "That communism dribble is propaganda used to condition you"

ADOS is not a communist movement. Everything you and Tariq are about is affiliated with communist cells.

KB: "Its a known tactic of the same white supremacy"

I am fully aware that communism is a tool of white supremacy.

KB: "that you claim you arent influenced by"

When did I claim that? 🤔 Considering the communists made it their mission to infiltrate everything my ethnic group touched over the last 100-years, it would be impossible to find some 100% not influenced by it in some way.

KB: "You been hearing that BS for 200 years now"

What happened 200-years ago—the 1820s?—that you keep bringing up that time frame? Something to do with the Caribbean?

KB: "Your argument today have been weak"

I don't care what you think about me. Why would I?

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - Yvette Carnell was directly connected to white supremacist name John Tanton. He created groups similar to ADOS to manipulate progressives and she worked in that overaction before ADOS. So we can see that she followed a Template created by a white supremacist to manipulate you. Nasheed was Sovereign moors, the FBI noted in 2014 that Moors were controlled by Sovereign citizens. 10 years ago I noticed these Moors and I watch how the same methods ( bots) I observed with them are being used now.

Muhammad Rasheed - KB: "Yvette Carnell was directly connected to white supremacist name John Tanton"

That's a long debunked lie, yet here you are still repeating it, and somehow you expect me to NOT to think you are a red commie propagandist partnered with white supremacy. Curious.

KB: "So we can see that she followed a Template created by a white supremacist to manipulate you."

So, because a literal commie agent troll lied and claimed she did, that means "we can see she did?" lol That's not how this works, bud. First, you would need to gain my buy-in, but since I recognize you as a low-level agent directly affiliated with my active enemy in the earth, that would never happen. Try harder, perhaps.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - Yvette has admitted to her role with Tanson organization. That is not disputed.

Muhammad Rasheed - Okay, so let's see it.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - 

Muhammad Rasheed - lol @ "to her role"

Okay, so how does this Tweet prove that she's MAGA? The Progressives for Immigration Reform org is politically diverse, or at least it was at the time Yvette joined. You're trying to vilify them, not because of this "Tanton" business, but because they advocate for stricter controls over immigration, without which has traditionally hurt the ADOS ethnic group.

Tweet Link

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - PFIR is directly connected to white supremacy and the Trump administration.

Muhammad Rasheed - Literally EVERY F*CKING THING is connected to white supremacy. We're in the Second Gilded Age, dumbass.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - It was funded and operated by John Tanton a known white supremacist. You said she wasnt involved. But course she was. Not only that PFIR funds several operation that tricks it members into thinking they are liberal organizations. They have a whole web of operations. All YOUR hate for immigrants was programmed by PFIR thats the real goal of ADOS and your comments show you have adopted it. 

Muhammad Rasheed - What part of Tanton's specific white supremacist schemes was Yvette directly involved in and actually helping him perform?

Because I didn't see that part in her Tweet you shared. Draw a circle around that part in MS Paint, please.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - So you admit that she is a member of a white supremacist organization, and you seek to excuse her for it? 😆 You are programmed.

Muhammad Rasheed - KB: "that tricks it members into thinking they are liberal organizations"

So, you admit that what she said in her Tweet was true—that she joined for noble reasons of her own, not to help a white supremist do evil shit like all of you anti-Black American, immigrant commies keep implying out of the side of your lying ass necks.

Interesting.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - PRIF is a hate group. And you exhibit the same hate that they were tasked with stiring up amongst progressive liberals....

Muhammad Rasheed - KB: "And you exhibit the same hate that they were tasked with"

Shut your dumbass up. You're siding with white supremacists to prevent the American descendants of slavery from getting our long overdue Reparations and economic inclusion. That's evil as f*ck, you stupid sh*t.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - Imagine how I feel about Black whites supremacy.

Muhammad Rasheed - Why would I care about what you decided to imagine?

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - Yvette Carnell worked for a white supremacist spreading anti immigrant hate, like Donald Trump does. Now YOU express anti Immigrant hate, JUST like Trump. Your membership are directly supportsTrump. Your statement align with Trump. You are just a few steps from dedicating your life to the GOP.

Muhammad Rasheed - KB: "Carnell worked for a white supremacist"

In her old Tweet that you shared, she explained the very reason why she joined.

KB: "spreading anti immigrant hate, like Donald Trump does."

If that were true, then why does the official ADOS Black Political Agenda include the Black diaspora immigrants? 🙄 Because you're a lying sack of sh*t.

KB: "Now YOU express anti Immigrant hate"

You only feel it because you were caught lying about the ADOS co-founder and now you're trying to deflect. Clumsily.

KB: "JUST like Trump."

Trump doesn't hate immigrants, because he's immigrant tied. He's just having beefs with certain identity groups—just like his dad did during Prohibition.

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - Yvette Carnell admits to what you say was a long debunked lie..... you have hate for other Black peoples.... thats the whole point of the organization you are in......

Muhammad Rasheed - KB: "Yvette Carnell admits to what you say was a long debunked lie..."

How come it doesn't say that in the Tweet you shared? How come the narrative you are spreading sounds completely different from what she explained? Bearing in mind, you ARE a lying-ass communist spy (pan-africanist division).

KB Amped (@kwelityvision) - The point of ADOS is to help Trump i can hear in your notes that you are now a black trump supporter. Meaning the rhetoric and the ignorant comments that you spew sound exactly like those of a white trump supporter. A white trump supporter runs around calling liberals communist. A white trump supporter attacks immigrants. You sound exactly like a white trump supporter. For a Black man that make YOU and Yvette sell out Trumpers

Muhammad Rasheed - KB: "The point of ADOS is to help Trump"

I already explained what the point of the ADOS movement is. It's right on the website. 

KB: "i can hear in your notes that you are now a black trump supporter."

Then you are either retarded, or an under-skilled gaslighter.

KB: "A white trump supporter runs around calling liberals communist."

You happen to be a communist, so they aren't wrong. *shrug*

KB: "A white trump supporter attacks immigrants."

They only attack certain immigrants. In ADOS' case, we condemn the weaponization of immigration policy against our identity group, used to keep us economically excluded and disenfranchised.

Muhammad Rasheed - Here's another one of your precious, communist African foreigners admitting they are friends with white supremacists, while you have to manufacture a false narrative for Yvette Carnell. smh

By the way, both Marcus Garvey and Elijah Mohammed were communists who were partnered with white supremacists.

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

The Worst Kind of Identity Crisis

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Worst Kind of Identity Crisis." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

**************************

TakeemaTelleMartin - The Greatest News I have received is, I’m an Israelite from the tribe of Judah.

Muhammad Rasheed - Why would anyone want to claim descent from a cursed people who rejected the kingship & prophethood of their messiah and schemed to get him killed?

Who in their right mind would willingly sign up to take on the burdens of that wicked heritage?

Shane - No offense but Judah and Benjamin were never cursed. The others were. But that's a whole different subject. Her lie is still applicable

Muhammad Rasheed - SHANE: "No offense but Judah and Benjamin were never cursed. The others were."

Based on what? The group most directly responsible for the conspiracy against the Christ was the Pharisees. They jealously guarded their power monopoly and frankly didn't expect the messiah to be such a strictly religious stick-in-the-mud who forbade their usury and rejected their toxic ethnicity complex.

Pharisee membership was not tied to tribal affiliation, and any amongst the twelve joined freely.

Shane - Show me where they were separated from God? You can't. Everything after the gospels involved Jews. Jews are from the tribe of Judah. They are still around and some even follow the Messiah. If you're going to correct me, you need to be biblically accurate

Muhammad Rasheed - SHANE: "Show me where they were separated from God?"

Their Temple was destroyed and they were scattered about the land. They are not allowed to return to the Promised Land until the second coming, when the submitted/repented among them will need to be escorted back by the messiah himself.

The rest will be destroyed.

Individuals among the nation can be forgiven if they repent and turn, but as a group, they are accursed because of what their hands sent forth from before.

Shane - You're a separationist. This explains your thinking. You are in man's view, not God's. Those things Jesus prophecied about while he was here. Why am I trying to explain this to you. You need to reread the Bible and come to terms or give up what you think you're doing. Edit, just saw your profile. Muslim means you don't know Christ or God. Nevermind. I wasted my time

Muhammad Rasheed - Your worship of a hard-hearted, arrogant cursed people will be your undoing.

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

[BATTLE MODE] An Attack by an MLM-Styled Hate Troll

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "[BATTLE MODE] An Attack by an MLM-Styled Hate Troll." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE  below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

**************************

Q: Is Jehovah the God of Muslims?

Muhammad Rasheed - Yes, YHWH is the Hebrew Tetragrammaton Name of Allah.

There is only One God.

Travis March - Please visit this website if you would like to learn more about the real truth of Islam: The Religion of Peace

Muhammad Rasheed - No, thank you. I have the Qur’an, the inerrant Word of God and the record of the example of His prophet to teach me about Al-Islam. This is sufficient. I have no interest in the demonic propaganda of xenophobic hate trolls.

Travis March - The Quran is absolutely rife with scientific errors, failed prophecies and contradictions, check out just some of the contradictions alone here: [WIKI] Contradictions in the Quran

Muhammad Rasheed - Travis wrote: “The Quran is absolutely rife with scientific errors, failed prophecies and contradictions”

None of that is true. What we have here are resentful anti-Islam xenophobes pushing false narratives as hate propaganda. This debunked rhetoric does not represent the religion of Islam, but the lies of bitter rivals.

Travis March - While there are objectively thousands of reasons we know for an absolute fact Islam is false, here are just 100: 100 Reasons Islam is False! (Response to "Can you give one reason not to believe in Islam?")

Muhammad Rasheed - Travis wrote: “While there are objectively thousands of reasons we know for an absolute fact Islam is false”

All of that is a lie. Watch this instead: DAVID WOOD CLAIMS HE FOUND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE QURAN | SYFEtalk

Travis March - You can barely attempt to explain a small percentage of them but there's so many you cannot explain them all. There are literally thousands of reasons we know it is false and not one shred of evidence to support it. It is also the most harmful ideology the world has ever seen.

Muhammad Rasheed - Travis wrote: “You can barely attempt to explain a small percentage of them”

Post a few here and let’s see. 😊

Travis wrote: “but there's so many you cannot explain them all."

Sure, we can. In fact, they were already thoroughly debunked before you discovered the material. You’re just used to only seeing life from your narrow-minded, xenophobic perspective.

Travis wrote: “There are literally thousands of reasons we know it is false”

There are thousands of made up false narratives you invented to pretend Islam is false, you mean.

Travis wrote: “and not one shred of evidence to support it.”

There’s actually LOTS of evidence for Islam as the Truth, but in my experience your team is too cowardly to confront the facts and would rather continue to swim around in your made up hate propaganda and high-five each other.

Travis wrote: “It is also the most harmful ideology the world has ever seen.”

No, your own white supremacist ideology holds that title. In fact, your specific approach in how you attack Islam using invented hate propaganda perfectly illustrates how you express white supremacy in real time: You hate Al-Islam because you feel it threatens your wealth & power monopoly. It doesn’t go any farther than that.

Travis March - Trust me, Islam has the most evidence showing it to be false of any religion on earth. All you have to do is do your research and you will find thousands of reasons that we know for an absolute fact it cannot be true no matter how much you want it to be. Thousands of Muslims are leaving at Islam every day because they realize it's simply not true.

Muhammad Rasheed - Travis wrote: “Trust me”

LITERALLY never. Dafuq? 🤨

Travis wrote: “Islam has the most evidence showing it to be false of any religion on earth.”

What you call “evidence” is merely a bunch of strawman arguments and false narratives that “convince” only the uninformed and gullible.

Travis wrote: “All you have to do is do your research”

I did. That’s why I’m Muslim.

Travis wrote: “and you will find thousands of reasons that we know for an absolute fact it cannot be true no matter how much you want it to be.”

Blindly swallowing the lies propagated by the acolytes of Sam Shamoun, GodLogic, David Wood, Christian Prince, etc., will lead only to hellfire.

Travis wrote: “Thousands of Muslims are leaving at Islam every day”

Hellfire for them all lest they repent and return to Islam before they die.

Travis March - You think people should suffer eternally in hell because they didn't fall for something that doesn't have a shred of evidence and has mountains of evidence against it? The funny thing is, the Quran is quite clear that all Muslims will go to hell and only a couple of them will make it out. Islam also has no path of salvation as even Muhammad did not know whether or not he was going to heaven. How dark is your soul from years of being Muslim? Do you feel that people should be killed for not joining your death cult? Because the Quran says they should be. Do you feel that people should be killed for leaving your death cult? Because You know the rest. You are in the world's most obviously false religion and the world's most harmful. Please do not promote that evil to others. We would be so much better off without this Muslim curse on the world.

Muhammad Rasheed - Travis wrote: “You think people should suffer eternally in hell because they didn't fall for something that doesn't have a shred of evidence and has mountains of evidence against it?”

I don’t know what you are talking about since you are talking AT me with hate propaganda. I do believe that people should be punished with an eternity of torment if they knowingly reject the God who made them after being aware of what the punishment is for doing so.

Travis wrote: “The funny thing is”

lol Objectively funny, or “funny” to willfully ignorant hate troll disbelievers?

Travis wrote: “the Quran is quite clear”

How would you know when you’ve never read it? 🤔 You think that skimming the cherry-picked verses compiled for pre-packaged arguments on your favorite anti-Islam hate websites—without the context clues—is the same thing as reading the Book.

Travis wrote: “that all Muslims will go to hell and only a couple of them will make it out.”

The Qur’an says the believers will go over hell on their way to heaven across the bridge called Sirat. The prophets will lead the way, while those who had the most difficult Judgment Day audit will bring up the rear. Since this is the group that actually passed Judgment Day, all of of them will make it across the bridge, so I have no idea what you are talking about.

Travis wrote: “Islam also has no path of salvation as even Muhammad did not know whether or not he was going to heaven.”

This is an ignorant comment. So, throughout the Qur’an, God says that His prophet was an excellent example of performing His religion, and Commanded the believers to follow the way Muhammadﷺ did it. God said to submit to Him and follow the way of His prophet as the way to get to heaven—it’s pretty clear on this fundamental point, a point that the prophet himself memorized and recited. Of course, the prophet knew he was going to heaven. 

What he didn’t know were the exact details of what lay for humanity on the other side of the veil between realities; God did not share the secrets of the unseen with His prophets, so Muhammad wasn’t able to tell the believers what they could expect in their new afterlife lifestyle, and God had him tell this to them in the Qur’an (46:9).

Travis wrote: “How dark is your soul from years of being Muslim?”

What would one such as you know about the soul? How dark is yours after a lifetime of white supremacist ideology, I wonder?

Travis wrote: “Do you feel that people should be killed for not joining your death cult?”

No. In the Qur’an, God said there is no compulsion in religion (Q2:256). Should you die in your current state, you will be held accountable for what you deliberately chose on Judgment Day.

Travis wrote: “Because the Quran says they should be.”

lol No, it doesn’t. 🙄

Travis wrote: “Do you feel that people should be killed for leaving your death cult? Because You know the rest.”

I know that the killing of apostates is a holdover law in some Muslim majority nations that used to be under European colonialist rule. The tribal resentments that would come from conversion and intermarriage between rival ethnic groups would often bubble up into violence under the stress of a foreign power powder keg, so the colonizers ruled that religious conversion would be punished by death. Today, people like you assume the law came from the religions themselves, but Q2:256 proves otherwise.

Why Blasphemy Laws Are Actually Anti-Islamic

Travis wrote: “You are in the world's most obviously false religion”

lol You are the world’s most obvious hate propagandist and peddler of lies.

Travis wrote: “and the world's most harmful.”

Revisit my summary of the ‘death for apostates’ law that your Über-violent colonizer ancestors inflicted upon the sovereign nations you all targeted for your demonic levels of hoarding greed.

Travis wrote: “Please do not promote that evil to others.”

Said the literal representative of white supremacy, the evilest force of the last millennium.

Travis wrote: “We would be so much better off without this Muslim curse on the world.”

That’s what the bad guys who opposed all of the prophets throughout history have always said.

Travis March - Supremist ideology, wow, you people really have nothing. I've never once seen a Muslim even remotely come close to defending all the evidence against it. I've seen a couple of the dawahgandists attempt to show their purported evidence for it and it is unbelievably laughable. There is not one shred of evidence for Islam. You are so brainwashed you can't even see it.

Muhammad Rasheed - Travis wrote: “Supremist ideology, wow”

Naturally, I’m not as impressed by the filth as you. You happen to be talking to a Black American orthodox Muslim, so of course I’m meta aware of your hate mongering, racketeering form of attacks on people different from you. Here you’ve just replaced your pet racism for xenophobia, but the basic template is the same.

Travis wrote: “you people really have nothing.”

Yes, you’ll confirm how truly nothing your evil is when you find yourself rough-handled by the angels on Judgment Day.

Travis wrote: “I've never once seen a Muslim even remotely come close to defending all the evidence against it.”

I’ve seen both Sam Shamoun and GodLogic quickly and impatiently hang up on callers who wouldn’t play along with their ignorantly shallow “word play semantics” style of religious “debate,” so the carefully curated pool of Muslims you target as preferred prey doesn’t mean much to me in your boasting.

Travis wrote: “I've seen a couple of the dawahgandists attempt to show their purported evidence for it and it is unbelievably laughable.”

TRANSLATION: “When I see an argument that I’m not equipped to address, I post an impotent string of giggle emojis and run.”

I know you do. All hate trolls perform that bit.

Travis wrote: “There is not one shred of evidence for Islam.”

Sure, there is. You’re just too cowardly—or just aren’t smart enough—to address the material head on.

Travis March - It's incredible that anyone would be Muslim with all the evidence against it but when I hear that a black person is Muslim it's even more cringe because Muhammad was an extreme racist against black people.

Muhammad Rasheed - Travis wrote: “It's incredible that anyone would be Muslim with all the evidence against it”

There is no evidence against Islam. There’s only misinformation deliberately spread by interconnected cliques of hate troll propagandists such as yourself.

Travis wrote: “but when I hear that a black person is Muslim it's even more cringe”

There are few things more cringe than you classic white conservative FoxNews racists pretending to care about anti-Black racism to spin your other pet hate narratives with.

Travis wrote: “because Muhammad was an extreme racist against black people.”

Meanwhile, he was none of these things. In the Qur’an, God says that the only thing He will Judge humanity by is our righteousness. In the prophet’s final sermon, he speaks against racism. lol

Travis March - I don't know why you are attacking a straw man about me being a white supremacist but of course Islam teaches you to lie. The old there is no compulsion in religion retort from the Muslims is always hilarious. The Quran is so filled with contradictions that the concept of abrogation must be employed where what Muhammad said later in his life over rules the earlier stuff. According to Islam's most trusted sources Muhammad was a pedophile, mass murderer, rapist, adulterer, slaver, demonically possessed, blasphemer, delivered satanic verses, was a caravan robber, drank camel urine, repeated false stories and narratives that were going around at the time, was a crossdresser, sucked the tongues of little boys, hated dogs and black people, was an extreme misogynist and died the exact one way the Quran said he would die if he was a false prophet. There is so much more as well. You people actually think this is the pattern of perfect conduct? You are in a cult, the most harmful one the world has ever seen and you can't see it.

Muhammad Rasheed - Travis wrote: “I don't know why you are attacking a straw man about me being a white supremacist”

A strawman fallacy is when someone invents an argument and attacks it while pretending it’s the opponent’s actual position. I have not done this, I’m merely calling out your white supremacy since I recognize the tactic template you’re using for your anti-Islam xenophobia.

Travis wrote: “but of course Islam teaches you to lie.”

This is a lie. Islam teaches no such thing. In the Qur’an, God gives the believers permission to insincerely reject Islam without penalty if threatened under compulsion, and we can eat swine flesh if there is literally nothing else to eat and we are starving. Disbeliever hate trolls disingenuously interpret this mercy as “Islam teaches you to lie” which means it is you who are indeed the liars.

Travis wrote: “The old there is no compulsion in religion retort from the Muslims is always hilarious.”

Is this really your official counter-response—the functional equivalent of an impotent string of giggle emojis? Ah. So, you aren’t here to try to debate, but to post hate cartoon memes and links to your equally impotent hate websites in a cowardly drive-by.

Travis wrote: “The Quran is so filled with contradictions”

After your raggedy disingenuous “taqiyya’ performance above, why would your interpretation of what’s a Qur’anic contradiction or not hold any credibility?

Travis wrote: “that the concept of abrogation must be employed where what Muhammad said later in his life over rules the earlier stuff.”

Every time the Qur’an mentions the concept of abrogation, it’s specifically talking about abrogating the Torah and Gospel with the Qur’an.

Travis wrote: “According to Islam's most trusted sources”

This means nothing coming from you. You don’t even understand what “Sahih” actually refers to, and incorrectly assumes that the raw, literal definition of a word is the same as its actual usage. This is why you low-level, drive-by hate propagandists don’t debate, because you are unprepared and too ignorant of the material you are so against. Your job is only to plant seeds of doubt in the minds of the unstudied and nonpracticing “cultural Muslim” — preferably the ones who don’t speak English well and are easily befuddled by your gang’s disingenuous semantics tricks.

Travis wrote: “Muhammad was a pedophile”

No, he wasn’t. 🙄

Travis wrote: “mass murderer”

Do you believe that prophets Abrahamﷺ, Joshuaﷺ and King Davidﷺ and any other wartime prophets of God were equally “mass murderers?” Why or why not?

Travis wrote: “rapist”

No, he wasn’t. 🙄

Travis wrote: “adulterer”

No, he wasn’t. 🙄

Travis wrote: “slaver”

Are you mad because he took war captives from among the evil pagan Meccans who tried to kill the early Muslim community, and from among the Banu Qurayza who broke the Medina Treaty and sided with the Meccan enemy? Choke on your hypocritical hatred then.

Travis wrote: “demonically possessed”

According to the bible, it would not be possible for Muhammadﷺ to be demonically possessed, because in the Qur’an, Allah instructs the believers to seek refuge with Him from the satan.

You are not equipped to debate. So, now we know the true reason why you’ve “never once seen a Muslim even remotely come close to defending all the evidence against it,” because you don’t know the material and arguing it isn’t your lane.

Travis wrote: “blasphemer”

He’s the messenger of God, sent to preach the revelation that confirms, fulfills and corrects the previous message, and instructs the faithful in scripture & wisdom. How could the prophet be a blasphemer? That charge makes no logical sense.

Travis wrote: “delivered satanic verses”

(see: ‘demonically possessed’ above)

Travis wrote: “was a caravan robber”

After the Muslim Exodus (hijra) to Medina, their enemies unlawfully confiscated their Meccan homes and sold all their stuff on eBay. When the Muslims saw their goods on the caravan, they went to get it back. Naturally, there’s no demographic on earth more uncomfortable at the idea of the oppressed taking back their stolen stuff than a white conservative male. There is absolutely nothing at all wrong with taking back your stolen goods from an imp of the satan who stole it from you as they attempted to beat you down into submission to their crooked and selfish way of life. I don’t expect you to EVER let this item go—it triggers the mess out of you, doesn’t it, white man? 😏

Travis wrote: “drank camel urine, repeated false stories and narratives”

#irony lol

Travis wrote: “that were going around at the time”

Like what?

Travis wrote: “was a crossdresser”

No, he wasn’t. 🙄

Travis wrote: “sucked the tongues of little boys”

No, he didn’t. 🙄

Travis wrote: “hated dogs”

The prophet didn’t “hate dogs” just because he gave them boundaries and forbid them spraying and pooping in the mosque. You only feel triggered about that item because your clan infamously sucks the tongues of dogs as a normal method of affection.

Travis wrote: “and black people”

No, he didn’t. 🙄

Travis wrote: “was an extreme misogynist”

No, he wasn’t. 🙄

Travis wrote: “and died the exact one way the Quran said he would die if he was a false prophet.”

The Qur’an says (Q69:45–46) that if the prophet betrayed his Lord, he would literally be seized by the hand and his “alwatin” would be cut.

The hadith said he was in so much pain that he used an analogy of it feeling as if his “'abhari” was being cut.

You appear to be confused over the meaning of the English word “exact.” I suggest night classes. According to the reports of the symptoms of his end-of-life illness, he appeared to suffer from some kind of respiratory illness that was common during the time period.

Travis wrote: “There is so much more as well.”

Do you have anything of actual substance and truth, or only more of the same lies/misinformation your clan typically peddles?

Travis March - Muhammad said that anyone who has seen a black man has seen Satan, he said his black slaves were worth half as much as his Arab slaves, he called black people raisin heads and the Hadiths are rife with gloating about how white Muhammad's skin was. He was such a racist that when the people were complaining for him killing all the dogs because he hated dogs he changed it to only killing black dogs going forward. Additionally, nothing about Trump is racist. You are fomenting division and creating a fake oppression narrative. You are so brainwashed it is staggering. I also saw on your profile you are asking for reparations. What about all the thousands of black people that own slaves here. What about all the black people and Arab people that sold the slaves. What about all the white people that fought to free the slaves. Slavery was not about black versus white. People like you are spreading so much hate and misinformation.

Muhammad Rasheed - Travis wrote: “Muhammad said that anyone who has seen a black man has seen Satan”

The adversary is an unseen spirit, not a human being, so this was clearly a false hadith conjured by anti-black racists during the foreign invasion Abbasid dynasty. It’s the reason the 9th century scholar Al-Jahiz felt the need to write his essay "The Superiority in Glory of the Black Race Over the White" to counter the new toxic trend.

Travis wrote: “he said his black slaves were worth half as much as his Arab slaves”

The prophet freed his only slave and adopted him as his son (Zayd).

Travis wrote: “he called black people raisin heads”

That hadith was only a descriptor and not an attack to demean anyone.

Travis wrote: “and the Hadiths are rife with gloating about how white Muhammad's skin was.”

The prophet’s grandfather (ʿAbdul Muṭṭalib ibn Hashim), father and uncles were all black men, so it is not likely that the prophet was a white man. lol At most, if he happened to be mulatto, he was of my complexion. The hadith Sahih al-Bukhari 3547 describes the prophet most accurately based on the evidence and basic logic.

Travis wrote: “He was such a racist that when the people were complaining for him killing all the dogs because he hated dogs he changed it to only killing black dogs going forward.”

This is clearly false and 100% out of character. smh

Travis wrote: “Additionally, nothing about Trump is racist.”

Of course he is very racist, but when did I bring up president Trump in this?

Travis wrote: “You are fomenting division and creating a fake oppression narrative.”

Projecting much? That literally describes the sole reason you’re in my comments.

Travis wrote: “You are so brainwashed it is staggering.”

You are brainwashed in white supremacy if you honestly don’t believe Trump is an anti-Black racist.

Travis wrote: “I also saw on your profile you are asking for reparations.”

I’m demanding my Reparations owed to me by my ever-complicit government for centuries of accrued discrimination.

Travis wrote: “What about all the thousands of black people that own slaves here.”

Where is “here?” Are you talking about U.S. free Black people who owned slaves?

Travis wrote: “What about all the black people and Arab people that sold the slaves.”

What about them?

Travis wrote: “What about all the white people that fought to free the slaves.”

There’s not a single white man who “fought to free the slaves.” The Union soldiers fought Lincoln’s war to keep the country from splitting up and to punish the confederates for their insolence. Lincoln’s decision to free the slaves was an unpopular and desperate war strategy because he was losing the war.

But even if the white Union soldier did fight to free the slaves, why would their descendants be owed reparations considering they received both pay and government benefits for their services?

Reparations are a debt owed for NOT being paid for your labor. I’m sure you are very well aware of this fact, but white folks are continuously scheming to grift more illicit free GibMeDats from somewhere.

Travis wrote: “Slavery was not about black versus white.”

It literally was. Black people were permanently delegated to a unique chattel bondsman class that specifically targeted physical racial phenotype. The institution was called “peculiar” because it was the life blood of the economy in the so-called “Land of the Free,” drawing global criticism for the hypocrisy. The confederates decided to openly own it with zero ambiguity:

Travis wrote: “People like you are spreading so much hate and misinformation.”

You hate me because I’m a truth teller and you detest such things, don’t you, boy? I strongly suggest you repent and convert to Al-Islam that you may manage to save your perverse, raggedy soul from the certainty of hell. Or don’t, that I may have the pleasure of seeing a representative of the diabolical fiend of legend flung head first into the Pitt by the angel as my personal entertainment. I’m honestly good either way.

Charles Graham - and assuming you speak arabic which koran do you have? https://answering-islam.org/Green/seven.htm

Muhammad Rasheed - I see the word “seven” in your unsolicited link.

You appear unaware that there is only one Qur’an message, but the prophet preached seven variant recitations of that same Qur’an during his lifetime, to make it easer for the companions to proselytize to the neighboring tribes who spoke the different Arabic dialects from his own native hejazi—which is the dialect used in the modern Qur’an that traces its lineage back to caliph Uthman’s standardized Book.

Darren Jones - There's thousands of gods and all of them are imaginary. You pretend yours is real because of brainwashing.

Muhammad Rasheed - There is only One God who has reached out to humanity at the very beginning, to instruct us who we are and what our relationship is with the spirit that we may prosper. It was God who told us He is ONE and anointed countless prophets over the generations to warn us about inventing the 'thousands' of false idols, to discard them and worship only the One who made us.

Conspicuously, none of the false idols we've invented have revealed their own mixtapes to challenge the claims of the One God in His ever-enduring scripture of the ages.

Travis March - There is so much misinformation here I don't even want to have to deal with it. You are pretentious, divisive, gullible sophistry slinger who blames other groups for your own failing.

Travis March - As I was going down the list I felt cringe as it was such an awful, feckless attempt at a viable retort for each point, but like most Muslims, you could not even remotely begin to twist what the sources actually say. Additionally, to say that anyone with common sense who sees all the evil of Islam both in its fruit and tenants is somehow a racist blows my mind. I have been helping Muslims leave Islam since 2016. Helping people leave this demonic death cult is one of the most positive things a person can do in his life. I understand that you are probably a decent person underneath your brainwashing but it's way underneath. Oh and of course Islam teaches you to lie with taqiyya, Muhammad being caught in multiple lies and of course him claiming that the God of the universe is the greatest of deceivers.

Muhammad Rasheed - Travis wrote: “There is so much misinformation here”

And it all came from you.

Travis wrote: “Additionally, nothing about Trump is racist.”

Here:

Muhammad Rasheed - 

M. Rasheed: “Do you have anything of actual substance and truth, or only more of the same lies/misinformation your clan typically peddles?”

Travis wrote: “As I was going down the list I felt cringe”

lol We’re done here. Thanks for confirming that you’re just a trolling copy/paster and not an intellectual, or even know how to debate. If you were, then you would have countered my responses with the evidence that proves your point—or at the least explained why I was wrong using logic, reason and wit.

Instead, you had a tantrum, and posted some more impotent cartoon memes or whatever. lol

I think you enjoy being an ineffectual lame. It’s the only skill you practice.

Travis wrote: “Oh and of course Islam teaches you to lie with taqiyya”

No, it doesn’t. God said we are allowed to eat swine if we are starving because there is literally nothing else to eat, and allowed to feign disbelief if our lives are in danger. That’s all. Your concept of “taqiyya" is a slur hate trolls invented.

Travis wrote: “him claiming that the God of the universe is the greatest of deceivers.”

The actual translation is “Best of Planners,” because no one can plan better than the Omniscient One God who literally knows everything. That’s the correct context of the verse.

Travis March - Yes, I think we are done here because your retorts are so cult member typical that I don't want you to keep embarrassing yourself. If you are the next generation of dawahgandist, then I feel this is a very good thing.

Muhammad Rasheed - We’re done, Travis, because you are not equipped to engage in a debate. You don’t know enough about the topic—you just blindly copy/paste and use your used car salesman rhetoric to bluff a fake point—and you are incapable of intelligently defending your position, or countering my responses. Your initial confidence gave away the fact that you are used to engaging with lesser opponents as I originally surmised.

Checkmate.

Travis March - As a close to grandmaster chess player myself I would say that putting that image in as if you won is so disingenuous that I can scarcely imagine the mentality it would take to do it.

Muhammad Rasheed - You made a claim attacking Islam from your pool of pre-packaged hate arguments.

I countered with a response referencing scripture.

Instead of countering back with evidence of your own, you started calling me names and having a tantrum. In what universe does that performance mean you won anything? lol

Go to bed. You’re drunk. Enjoy this L.

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!