Rogue Moderators: Official Abuse of Social Media Power

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Rogue Moderators: Official Abuse of Social Media Power." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 2024.  [cartoon pending] Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

*************************************

Alamin Hossain - Jesus declared, “Surely Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him ˹alone˺. This is the Straight Path.” ~(Holy Qur'an 19:36)

Nazarenes Caller - Who? When? How did 6th century Muhammad came to know what Jesus said 600 years before? If you say Isa ibn Maryam the cousin of Haroon and Musa said - we would not care dear. Prove things with historical evidences.

Alamin Hossain - This is the matter you should think deeply that after 600 years before and from 1000 miles away an Arab guy how and why he was guided to talk about Jesus.

Firstly Muhammad wouldn’t know anything about Jesus birth, whether he was killed or not etc. Quran is revealed to him by Allah thus he know about Jesus.

Muhammad Rasheed - Nazarenes wrote: "How did 6th century Muhammad came to know what Jesus said 600 years before?"

Divine revelation came to the prophet of God.

Nazarenes Caller - @Muhammad... does this look like natural causes? Or muhammad the false prophet died of poison from the Jewish lady eventually after a terrible 3 years. Can you laugh now abdool? https://sunnah.com/bukhari:4428

Muhammad Rasheed - Nazarenes wrote: "from the Jewish lady"

So, a Jew fabricated a hadith (or a portion of the ahadith) and you decided you should enthusiastically believe it without any critical scrutiny whatsoever, huh?

Is that why you believe that particular hadith should be unquestionably believed with pure blind faith like it was Jesus himself? lol

Tell me why, out of ALL THE OTHER HADITH that are far, far better supported, that you decided to have PURE BLIND FAITH — the same exact pure blind faith you give to your "divine son Jesus" concept — to this hadith? lol

Please explain. I'm sure this will be a great story.

Nazarenes Caller - Sahih Bukhari fabricated by jews now? Abdool, you are really deluded, ask your Imam next time you go to mosque 

Muhammad Rasheed - "Sahih" means that Bukhari, Muslim, etc., used a particular quality check method to evaluate the trustworthiness of the people interviewed. It doesn't mean that the content of the narrations themselves are guaranteed to be what they say they are.

FYI.

Nazarenes Caller - Bring evidence for the nonsense you wrote right now in 3mins or you are going on the corner, means getting suspended

Muhammad Rasheed - 

Muhammad Rasheed - Nazarenes wrote: "you are really deluded"

For some reason, a hostile outsider who hates my religion with his entire raggedy soul (such as it is) expects me to hold the same values and beliefs about my religion that he has.

Curious.

Muhammad Rasheed - I honestly think you are doomed to hellfire because of everything you've typed in this FB chat group. Just in case you weren't clear.

Instead of expecting me to also be an idiot and partner with you in foolishness, I strongly suggest you repent and convert to Al-Islam before it's too late for you.

**** Nazarenes Caller abused his Admin/Moderator powers to ban me from from the Christianity and Islam religious debates chat group because he lost a debate ****

[BATTLE MODE] Muslim versus the Xenophobic Hate Troll

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "[BATTLE MODE] Muslim versus the Xenophobic Hate Troll." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 2024.  [cartoon pending] Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

*************************************

Q: Why in Islam is Allah called the best of deceivers?

Muhammad Rasheed - lol Allah is not called “the best of deceivers” in Islam, He’s only called that as a disingenuous slur by the anti-Islamic xenophobe crowd.

Atheist, Jewish, Christian and Hindu chat group debaters collude to shamelessly fashion a ‘shadow Islam’ strawman effigy, composed of carefully cherry-picked-out-of-context Qur’an quotes, deliberately twisted Islamic principles and sayings, upholding poorly-supported and obscure hadith, pretending certain secular Arabian societal norms were inherently religious, and as shown within this very Question, purposely mistranslating Qur’anic verses using synonyms with negative connotations and pretending it’s the most correct translation in order to smear the religion. Apparently, our debate opponents find it safer to maintain their delusions by arguing at their conjured ‘shadow Islam’ strawman, instead of risking a candid & courageous truth-seeking discussion with the game proponents of Al-Islam.

James Chambers - Because allah=devil?

Think about it. The religion dominates its population, allows acts of brutality against nonbelievers, etc.

Muhammad Rasheed - James wrote: “Because allah=devil? Think about it.”

In the Qur’an, Allah explains why the arrogant satan rebelled and fell from heaven, warns humanity to avoid the creature’s treacherous promises, and has the believers seek refuge with Allah from satan in everyone of our prayers. So, when I “think about it” as you suggest, it appears that you like to type without any facts/truth to support your claims.

James wrote: “The religion dominates its population”

Does it? I’m a lifelong practicing Muslim and I’m not “dominated” by Islam. It’s a willing, voluntary walk along the Path because I choose to believe the promises of my Guardian Lord are true. In fact, as a member of the Black American (ADOS) ethnic group, the only religion that literally and brutally dominated me throughout my family’s history in my country is that of the former slave holder’s identity group.

James wrote: “allows acts of brutality against nonbelievers”

Like what?

James wrote: “etc.”

???

Smedley Farnsworth - I would like you to comment on what is below.

Here are but a few non-tolerant verses of the koran that moslems follow This is what moslems believe about the rest of the worlds population:

• "Kill the Jews and the Christians if they do not convert to Islam or refuse to pay Jizya tax.” Koran 9:29
• “Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.” Koran 2:191
• “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.” Koran 9:123
• “When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.” Koran 9:5
• “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.” Koran 3:85
• “The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.” Koran 9:30
• “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam” Koran 5:33
• “The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque.” Koran 9:28
• “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.” Koran 22:19
• “Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them.” Koran 47:4
• “The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.” Koran 8:65
• “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.” Koran 3:28
• “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an.” Koran 8:12
• “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.” Koran 8:60

Muhammad Rasheed - I saw these on a meme card somewhere earlier. I’ll address them one-by-one since you’ve asked nicely, but your questions about it would clear up immediately if you just read the Qur’an for yourself and saw what they actually said in context. Some of them aren’t even real and were invented by the original sneaky meme creator as some kind of exegesis from a hostile, propagandist outsider.

Stand by…

Smedley Farnsworth - It is quite common to hear the argument from Muslims and apologists of Islam, the old standby of, “you have quoted out of context.” Or that you have not read all of the book.

Just what is out of context with "Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the latter day and who do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden and who do not adopt Islam, (even if they are) of the People of the Book - [fight] until they humbly pay the Jizyah and have been subdued." ~Quran 9:29

It seems very clear to me like these ones.

• “Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.” Koran 2:191
• “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.” Koran 9:123
• “When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.” Koran 9:5

Then of course there is the practice of koranic "abrogation"; It refers to the practice whereby contradictory material within, the koran — is resolved by superseding or cancelling the earlier verse with the later one. Thus the “good” verses are trumped by the later hateful ones.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley wrote: “It is quite common to hear the argument from Muslims and apologists of Islam, the old standby of, ‘you have quoted out of context.’”

You literally posted a list of cherry-picked verses isolated out of context. Since this is a common fallacy trait of anti-Muslim critics, why wouldn’t I point it out when you do it?

Smedley wrote: “Or that you have not read all of the book.”

The rest of the Book is where the context of the verses lay that you left out, yes? lol

Smedley wrote: “Just what is out of context with 'Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the latter day and who do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden and who do not adopt Islam, (even if they are) of the People of the Book - [fight] until they humbly pay the Jizyah and have been subdued.' - Quran 9:29"

I answered that one further down in this thread, but I’ll repost the context here, too:

Again, this is talking about cleansing the Holy City specifically of hostile disbelievers while the peace treaty was in place.

Smedley wrote: “It seems very clear to me”

You don’t study the religion though and are uninformed.

Smedley wrote: “like these ones. [Koran 2:191, Koran 9:123, Koran 9:5]"

I already answered those above.

Smedley wrote: “Then of course there is the practice of koranic ‘abrogation.’ It refers to the practice whereby contradictory material within, the koran — is resolved by superseding or cancelling the earlier verse with the later one. Thus the ‘good’ verses are trumped by the later hateful ones.”

None of this is true. Scriptural abrogation refers to the Qur’an abrogating the previous revelation and being a fuller explanation of the Book of Moses (pbuh).

Smedley Farnsworth - Are you being deliberately obtuse, yes of course you are. You are using Taqiyya. Taqiyya is where moslems say what they want infidels to believe. In other words – moslems lie all the time to conceal the true evil intent of islam.

Moslems do it all the time. The biggest deception is that “islam is a religion of peace”.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley wrote: “Are you being deliberately obtuse, yes of course you are.”

Because I don’t blindly accept the hostile opinion of an enemy of my faith?

Smedley wrote: “You are using Taqiyya.”

You’re using a term generally known to be stressed by the shia sect (I am not a shiite), but used mostly by Western anti-Islam propagandists to smear Islam. You’re presenting it as if you are an expert on the religion of Al-Islam, and not just a hostile troll who gets all of his shady lore from hate sites.

Smedley wrote: “moslems lie all the time to conceal the true evil intent of islam.”

Funny. I happen to be a member of the ever-maligned Black American former slave class ethnic group who subscribes to the religion. In my people’s experience, one would get the impression that white men invented lying, as I still find myself struggling for economic inclusion as a full citizen in my own country because of the diabolical political manipulations of the white identity group. I am not interested in your shallow attempts to smear my adopted faith since it is no secret what your true motives are. Notice you are pretending that your short list of cherry-picked verses and half interpreted verses are the entirety of the Qur’an and when I demonstrate the greater context and message the verses come from, you accuse me of lying about it. You are the one committing the cherry-picking fallacy, but you claim I’m lying for pointing out YOUR xenophobic propagandist deceptions. This is a classic, no-frills performance of the white male I know in history.

Smedley wrote: “Moslems do it all the time.”

Do we, white man? How are you tracking that data exactly?

Smedley wrote: “The biggest deception is that ‘islam is a religion of peace.’”

It is a religion of peace, as its practitioners are commanded to uphold the truth and protect the vulnerable. The last thing you would need is for the people at large to be so empowered, since it would sabotage your goals of total domination with zero competition on the world stage.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley posted: “’Kill the Jews and the Christians if they do not convert to Islam or refuse to pay Jizya tax.’ Koran 9:29″

For context, the Muslims had just reclaimed the Holy City of Mecca after many years of exile. They were about 10,000 strong but not a drop of blood was shed. Even though the Muslims were all dressed in pilgrim garb, determined to complete the Hajj ritual, their pagan foes were intimidated by their numbers alone.

There was a peace treaty in play up to that point, but one of the pagan tribes had blatantly violated their side of the bargain, and these are the ones Allah had the prophet announce aloud that the believers were commanded to run them out of the city and slay them if they were found hiding. The other pagan tribes who hadn’t broken the treaty were to be treated with kindness in hopes they would convert by the contract’s expiry. If not, then the Holy City of Mecca was for the believers in Allah alone and even the Jews and Christians had to leave. This restriction is only for Mecca and not for any other Muslim majority place; Jews and Christians can live in peace under Muslim rule as long as they pay the jizya.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley posted: “’Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.’ Koran 2:191”

The early Muslims who fled persecution from the pagan Meccas by going to Medina started off as a vulnerable, pitiful little band. Their number were steadily growing though, with the strict monotheist message eventually threatening the peace-of-mind of the powerful polytheist tribes who controlled the pilgrimage revenue, who made the decision to wipe the Muslims out completely which they tried and failed at a few times.

The Qur’an’s controversial “war verses” are only defensive in nature, and the take the righteous position as a guide for those who believe.

Smedley Farnsworth - Thank you for proving my points.

Muhammad Rasheed - lol I’m not done yet, but how did I prove your point exactly? What is your point?

Smedley Farnsworth - I am exposing the flaws and violence of islam and the lengths you go to hide it from non moslems. (Until it is to late).

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley wrote: “I am exposing the flaws”

Are you? Because from here it looks like a textbook cherry-picking fallacy performance.

Smedley wrote: “and violence of islam”

The fact that the so-called “violence of Islam” is no different than the violence of the biblical prophets, but without the problematic corrupt parts your scribes and Constantinian councils added later, means you’re trying to make a mountain out of a sand divot.

Smedley Farnsworth - It looks like cherry-picking to you because you are looking from the viewpoint of being inside islam and you don’t want the truth exposed.

What about the violent passages in the Bible?

First, violent Biblical passages are irrelevant to the question of whether Islam is violent and is simply “whataboutism” on your part in a failed attempt to deflect away from the fact of islamic violence.

Second, the violent passages in the Bible certainly do not amount to a standing order to commit violence against the rest of the world. Unlike the koran, the Bible is a huge collection of documents written by different people at different times in different contexts, which allows for much greater interpretative freedom. The koran, on the other hand, comes exclusively from one source: Muhammad. It is through the life of Muhammad that the koran must be understood, as the koran itself says. His wars and killings both reflect and inform the meaning of the koran. Furthermore, the strict literalism of the koran means that there is no room for interpretation when it comes to its violent injunctions. As it is through the example of Christ, the "Prince of Peace," that Christianity interprets its scriptures, so it is through the example of the warlord and despot Muhammad that Muslims understand the koran.

You problem is, that I, a non moslem, do understand the true nature of islam and both reject it and expose it.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley wrote: “It looks like cherry-picking to you because you are looking from the viewpoint of being inside islam”

Meanwhile, it looks like cherry-picking to me because you literally use a short list of isolated verses that you (and the original meme writer you pulled them from) are trying to pretend mean something different from the Qur’an’s actual messaging context. lol

Smedley wrote: “and you don’t want the truth exposed.”

Ha! Sure, I do. I love it. More than you know, white man.

Smedley wrote: “What about the violent passages in the Bible?”

That’s not what I said. That makes this is a strawman effigy.

Smedley wrote: “First, violent Biblical passages are irrelevant to the question of whether Islam is violent and is simply ‘whataboutism’ on your part in a failed attempt to deflect away from the fact of islamic violence.”

I didn’t commit the WhatAboutism fallacy. In Islam, we believe in the pillar “BELIEF IN THE PROPHETS” which means we are commanded by God to treat all the prophets exactly the same. Allah said they all had the same mission and all performed excellently, and so we aren’t to treat any of them any different than any other. So, far from deflecting from the topic as you falsely claimed, what I actually said was that Muhammad functioned with his violence no different than the prophets before him — he stood in the righteous position of defense to protect his community from the enemies of Islam. A criticism against the violence performed by Muhammad is a criticism against all of the prophets at one and the same time.

Smedley wrote: “Second, the violent passages in the Bible certainly do not amount to a standing order to commit violence against the rest of the world.”

That’s arguable. There’s a reason that I did NOT say “the violent passages in the bible,” but pointedly said the violence of the biblical prophets themselves, which is an altogether different kettle of fish. The bible is a notoriously fabricated document according to your own believing Christian scholars—corrupt beyond repair—and horrendous acts were shoved into the text by people pushing un-Godly political agendas. I was talking about the actions performed by the prophets of olde according to the spirit of the Word and God’s message, not whatever your corrupt bible literally says about violence. That’s the real reason you are protesting talking about the bible’s violence in a comparative manner, because you realize you would not come out on top in such a contest. Did I not demonstrate the true context of the Qur’an’s so-called ‘war verses?’ The only context of the bible passage violence is corruption.

Smedley wrote: “Unlike the koran, the Bible is a huge collection of documents written by different people at different times in different contexts, which allows for much greater interpretative freedom.”

“Interpretive freedom” meaning you are in the habit of conjuring lies to grift the community with a fabricated pagan doctrine pretending to be from God. I’m quite aware of what you hold and what you do with it. I suggest you repent.

Smedley wrote: “The koran, on the other hand, comes exclusively from one source: Muhammad.”

It comes from Allah. Muhammad (pbuh) is merely the mouthpiece, commanded to only speak the Words that the Lord thy God put into his servant’s mouth and commanded him speak, as described in Deut. 18:18. ;)

Smedley wrote: “It is through the life of Muhammad that the koran must be understood”

It’s weird watching hostile outsiders proclaim false things about material they have never studied with such tissue-thin confidence. lol

Smedley wrote: “as the koran itself says.”

Be so kind as to provide the verse that says this, please, if ye are truthful.

Smedley wrote: “His wars and killings”

lol They were not his wars and killings, since there was an active bad guy on the stage who initiated all conflicts. The Muslims stood only in the righteous position of defense.

Smedley wrote: “both reflect and inform the meaning of the koran.”

I’ll accept this. If you will notice, the full context of the message that your cherry-picked verses conspicuously left out did provide direct instruction as to how the believers were to act in wartime.

Smedley wrote: “Furthermore, the strict literalism of the koran”

lol This is yet another example of you violently proclaiming something about Islam that is patently not true. The Qur’an often uses a poetic style of expression, generously providing similes, metaphors and similitudes of things:

You would know this if you ever bothered to read the Book for yourself. Then you would have the benefit of actually knowing what you were talking about instead of embarrassing yourself as a committed xenophobic hate-peddling troll.

Smedley wrote: “means that there is no room for interpretation when it comes to its violent injunctions.”

So, to be clear, you’re saying that you—in your role as the hostile outsider who demonstrably has no idea what he’s talking about—has the authority and leeway WITHIN ISLAM to legitimately invent/conjure/concoct meanings for the Qur’anic verses as you see fit, and they will be equally as real (and more so!) than the actual context of the message itself. lol Is that what you are saying to me, with a straight face, no less? Honestly, I think you deserve to be arrested for the suggestion as a crime against truth itself.

Smedley wrote: “As it is through the example of Christ, the ‘Prince of Peace’"

Show me in the New Testament where Jesus (pbuh) is ever called the Prince of Peace, please. Your emboldened use of quotations there amused me, so I’ll go ahead and call your bluff.

Smedley wrote: “that Christianity interprets its scriptures”

Christians interpret their so-called “scriptures” in a way that defies both logic and common sense. You ignore the unambiguous, explicit sayings of Jesus, to instead use ambiguous, implicit verses to cobble together the pagan-influenced tripe you are famous for. Your clumsy attempts to use the same cock-eyed flimflammery on the Qur’an are rejected out of hand as the sputtered ravings of a crackpot.

Smedley wrote: “so it is through the example of the warlord and despot Muhammad”

The prophet of Islam was neither a warlord, nor a ‘despot.’ If he was, then certainly so was both Moses (pbuh) and Joshua (pbuh).

Smedley wrote: “that Muslims understand the koran.”

You think I understand the Qur’an through the eyes of a hostile propagandist troll, do you? I think one would just have to read my responses to see if that were objectively true or not. Do you honestly believe that you give the impression that you really know Islam to outsider eyes, especially since everything you say can be found on the typical anti-Islam hate site meme graphics?

Smedley wrote: “You problem is, that I, a non moslem, do understand the true nature of islam and both reject it and expose it.”

If this is true, then please begin to provide proof/evidence of your claims. So far, in providing the greater context of your isolated, cherry-picked verses, the truth is firmly upon my side of the argument and you didn’t have a firm comeback.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley posted: “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.’ Koran 9:123”

This verse is for those Muslims who are surrounded by active hostile enemies who have waged war upon them. Allah is reminding the believers that they have Him on their side, while the unbelievers only have sociopathic greed and the whispers of the satan.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley posted: “’When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.’ Koran 9:5″

This took place when the Muslims returned to Mecca from exile and took Mecca without bloodshed while wearing the pilgrimage garb. This announcement was letting the pagans who broke the peace treaty know that war would be waged upon them lest they fled or converted, while the pagan tribes who upheld the terms of peace would be granted leniency until the contract expired, then they would be required to leave the Holy City, too, lest they converted.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley posted: “’Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.’ Koran 3:85″

The All-Powerful One God, Supreme Creator of reality and Master of the Day of Judgment sent His final revealed scripture (Qur’an) and perfected His religion (Al-Islam) as a universal message for humanity, so why would He accept anything else from someone who believed and then rejected it?

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley posted: “’The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.’ Koran 9:30”

If you’re feeling some kind of way about being called out by the Lord of the worlds for your perverting of the faith of the prophets of olde, then it should stand to reason that you would try to fix your perverted state instead of complaining that you got called out for your wrongdoing.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley posted: “’Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam’ Koran 5:33”

There’s nothing in the verse you’re supposed to be referencing that says anything about killing for “criticizing” Islam; this is clearly a message of instruction during active war time.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley posted: "’The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque.’ Koran 9:28″

This bullet of yours is pretending people aren’t allowed in ANY mosque, when it’s in fact talking about restrictions around THE mosque — al-Masjid al-Ḥarām that encircles the Ka’aba in Mecca. The infidels are the ones who filled the House of Allah with 300+ idols, remember? Clearly, they don’t need to be anywhere NEAR the most sacred site in Al-Islam. I don’t even understand why you included this bullet, other than deliberately pretending the verse said something it didn’t say. Staying away from the Ka’aba is different from visiting a local mosque in Columbus OH, right? lol

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley posted: “‘Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.’ Koran 22:19”

This is clearly a description of the torment of hell, not a command for the believers to torture anyone. lol smdh You have zero credibility. I hope you realize that.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley posted: “’Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them.’ Koran 47:4”

This one is instructing the believers in how to treat the defeated enemy during individual battles within a greater war campaign. Making them sign a strict contract and giving the leeway to be either generous with them or offer ransom depending on their behavior during this period. That’s the literal opposite of what your bullet claimed.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley posted: “’The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.’ Koran 8:65”

lol This one is 99% accurate. The only part you’re missing is that the pagan Meccan forces were on their way to Medina to wipe the Muslims out, and Allah gave the prophet permission to tell the believers to defend themselves. Allah sent down a company of angels to help them, so they shouldn’t fear.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley wrote: “’Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.’ Koran 3:28″

Accurate. ‘Nuff said. Do you think all of the lies and slander you’ve put forth against my sacred belief system this day qualify you as friendship material? Alright then. Shaddap.

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley posted: “’Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an.’ Koran 8:12”

This is another of Allah’s after-battle-briefings where He explains to the believers the nature of the Help he provided for the Battle of Badr. Again, this was when the pagan Meccan forces came to Medina with the intention of completely annihilating the Muslims and Allah didn’t allow it. With His help, 300 Muslim fighting men defeated 1,000 pagans. Note how none of this has anything to do with attacking people who “believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an” which was clearly a lie. Aren’t you the one who brought up the jizya tax? You all should think your lies through so there is at least some consistency. smh

Muhammad Rasheed - Smedley posted: “’Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.' Koran 8:60"

This is only describing normal, common sense battle preparation. What’s the matter? Does the idea of the God-fearing oppressed preparing to strike back against a long-time enemy disturb you, white man? I think we both know that very imagery is the root cause for your hatred against Al-Islam. It’s VERY different from what the old slave holders taught to my ancestors from your doctored-up version of Christianity, isn’t it? You SHOULD be in terror as you’ve earned it. I suggest you repent.

Norman Jones - M. Rasheed quoted: "and the best of planners is Allah."

Thanks for your answer. So what you are saying is that Allah also plotted and planned and Allah is the best plotter and planner. I just don't understand why you contradict yourself.

Muhammad Rasheed - The Omniscient One God by definition is the Best Tactician — His power to know literally everything makes God the Most Skilled at planning tactics. The usage of the word “deceiver” or to imply that “planner” in your own usage above has a negative connotation from your biased position doesn’t make sense in context outside of anti-Islam hate propaganda.

Norman Jones - Islam is full of contradictions, read the Quran with an open mind and you will see for yourself . Abrogated versus make no sense. An all known God would not change his mind.

Muhammad Rasheed - Norman wrote: “Islam is full of contradictions”

lol No, it’s not.

Norman wrote: “read the Quran with an open mind”

I did. That’s why I’m a practicing Muslim.

Norman wrote: “and you will see for yourself”

Are you supposed to be pretending that you’ve read the Qur’an before? Skimming cherry-picked quotes on your favorite anti-Islam hate site is not the same as reading the Qur’an for yourself, bud.

Norman wrote: “Abrogated versus make no sense.”

The Qur’an abrogates the previous scriptures and is a fuller explanation of the Law of Moses. That’s what Allah was talking about.

Norman wrote: “An all known God would not change his mind.”

The problem with that line is it inappropriately reflects up towards God instead of inward towards yourself. It’s an arrogant position to take. God does what He does to guide and test us. That’s the entire point of scripture and the history of the Word on earth.

Norman Jones - Islam is brainwashed and your a good example. Please provide proof of your assumption, and don't say the Quran, which has no proof of anything,except that it is a badly written book. Harry Potter makes more sense. Flying horses don't exist.

Muhammad Rasheed - Norman wrote: “Islam is brainwashed and your a good example.”

You don’t appear to know what “brainwashed” actually means. So far, you’ve proven that all you know how to do is blindly parrot hate propaganda. You don’t have a cohesive position you are capable of defending, you just say stuff you heard without understanding. This is what it looks like when someone is brainwashed.

Norman wrote: “Please provide proof of your assumption, and don't say the Quran”

lol Well, I’ll say the Qur’an anyway, thanks. You’ve never read it, and I’ll wager you’ve never even tried. Do you think I can’t tell the difference between someone who is actually informed on the topic and holds well-thought out criticisms he’s willing to explain versus someone like you who’s only heard something somewhere and wants to shout at people from across the street with no certain knowledge? Why are you even on Quora? This platform isn’t for one such as you. TikTok is down the hall to the left.

Norman wrote: “which has no proof of anything”

Sure, it does.

Norman wrote: “except that it is a badly written book.”

How would YOU know?

Norman wrote: “Harry Potter makes more sense.”

Does it? The Qur’an says to worship only the One God who made you, do good, reject evil and repent when you mess up. Is that alien to you?

Norman wrote: “Flying horses don't exist.”

Explain to me—in your own words—what “flying horses” have to do with the religion of Al-Islam, if you please. Take your time.

A Slow Leakage in Your False Confidence

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "A Slow Leakage in Your False Confidence.'" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 2024 [cartoon pending]. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

*************************************************

Clinton Mannathoko - As a non-Muslim I admire the fact that Islam seems to be spot on, the Muslims memorise the Quran, they pray 5 times a day, they practice their faith a lot, but if you ask us Christians we go to church once a week and sin every hour we can, Islam is a force

Itß Yœùñg Mõõßã Munowelenkhu - I wonder because if someone goes to work he / she go every day but we forget to worship to God gave us everything for Free but choose to work every day for world material.

Clinton Mannathoko - @Itß... its human of us we forget but Muslims just make it a point to make this apart of who they are

Anthony McCullough - @Clinton... You speak for All Christian now 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Clinton Mannathoko - @Anthony... it’s my view, you could always add your input. They are a resilient people and you see that in them with the genocide in Gaza, no people would stand that psychological and mentally it’s just horrible but they stand strong cause of the constant implementation of their faith

Anthony McCullough - you stated Christiana like you are the spokesperson for all Christians. You can't possibly have a view about what all Christians do or believe stop kidding yourself

Zak Bungwon - @Clinton... Admiration adds nothing of value; why not become one, if you think you can be guaranteed of life here, & in the hereafter!

But, remember that, even Muhammad (saw) died with the uncertainty of not knowing what would be done with him, let alone with his companions & followers! Shine your eyes!🙏

Clinton Mannathoko - @Zak... yes and that follows his belief that he isn’t God and he is merely a man, I see nothing wrong there

Zak Bungwon - Yes, you may see nothing wrong with it, if you too don't know what will be done with you! So, why not just become what you admire, since there's no law of apostasy forcing you to remain where you now are?!🤷‍♂️

Clinton Mannathoko - I find it hard sometimes to understand the Nigerian Dialogue it throws me off a little but fear not my brother I am putting it together. So your statement is that Muhammad did not know what is to happen to him? And I admire a religion that doesn’t give guarantee of heaven by just having faith alone but by works they resemble their faith, I think that’s what you are sayijg

Zak Bungwon - No, I actually mean you should be what you admire, if there's nothing superior about what you now are, and there's nothing forcing you to be where & what you now are!

Muhammad Rasheed - Clinton wrote: "So your statement is that Muhammad did not know what is to happen to him? And I admire a religion that doesn’t give guarantee of heaven by just having faith alone but by works they resemble their faith, I think that’s what you are sayijg"

In the Qur'an, numerous times Allah told the prophet that he was doing a great job and his reward was assured. Allah also told the prophet ("Say:") to tell the people that he was only a warner who had no insider knowledge of the unseen. Our debate opponents like to use the latter part of that to pretend that the prophet didn't know whether he was going to paradise or not, when that's clearly not the case.

Clinton Mannathoko - @Muhammad... I admire Him and from the start I mentioned that Islam is undoubtedly the religion to go to. Quran seems to have things straight and we Christians attack two things about Islam first being his marriage to little Aisha at 6 years of age and 2 the virgins that Muslims are promised if they die in war

Muhammad Rasheed - Clinton wrote: "his marriage to little Aisha at 6 years of age"

I don't even understand why the African community are even bringing it up, considering many of their own cultures mimic that of the two Semite nations when it comes to the Age of Consent. In the numerous cultures around the globe and throughout history that greatly valued having a LOT of children in their families, marrying women off the second they hit puberty is the go-to move. This is not even a religious item they are griping over, it was just the societal norm in 7th century Arabia. In addition to this, the prophet and his close inner circle—the four members of the proto-Rashidun Caliphate (Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman & Ali)—all agreed to marry into one another's families to tighten their deep friendships with ties of kinship. I honestly thought that was pretty cool (albeit alien to my 21st century USA sensibilities). I think it's petty for atheists and Christians to attempt to make a big deal about it. The fact that the Jews are conspicuously quiet as church mice on the issue amuses me.

Clinton wrote: "and 2 the virgins that Muslims are promised if they die in war"

I can't even pretend to understand what the argument against that is. I just got killed in a war I stood up in FOR GOD, but I can't have a couple of magical, immortal wives that no one else touched? In heaven? Why not? lol

Bong Dee - @Clinton... As a Christian we advise you to stay away from the teachings of a sinful man like Muhammad. No pervert pedophile adulterer womanizer murderer and false prophet like Muhammad goes to heaven.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "As a Christian we advise you to stay away from the teachings of a sinful man like Muhammad."

His teachings were to worship the One God of Abraham (pbuh) alone, to do good, reject evil and repent when you mess up. You hate that, huh?

Bong wrote: "No pervert"

The prophet wasn't a pervert.

Bong wrote: "pedophile"

The prophet wasn't a pedophile.

Bong wrote: "adulterer"

The prophet wasn't an adulterer.

Bong wrote: "womanizer"

The prophet wasn't a womanizer.

Bong wrote: "murderer"

The prophet wasn't a murderer.

Bong wrote: "and false prophet"

The prophet wasn't false. His teachings were to worship the One God of Abraham (pbuh) alone, to do good, reject evil and repent when you mess up. Does that sound "false" as an Abrahamic theist?

Bong Dee - @Muhammad... see you really don't read the Bible to know the truth. I am sorry for you because your going to hell and you don't know who are you dealing. Why is he a pervert, an adulterer, a pedophile, a womanizer and a false prophet.

So let's start, Jesus and Moses taught that a man and a woman can marry the two will be one. Muhammad said you abdools can marry 4, this is in fact against Jesus and Moses teachings so this is a perversion of their teachings. Furthermore he married more than 4 so his indeed a pervert and an adulterer. What is more demonic he married little Aisha that pedophilia and that's why his a false prophet because Jesus and Moses never taught that a man can marry a little girl. Only with a woman so that age is about 14 to 18 years old. He married Aisha when she was 6 yrs old only a pervert will marry a little girl 😂😂😂😂

Clinton Mannathoko - @Bong... you aren’t judge to say where someone is going so don’t pass out verdicts, here we are men and we let God do what he does.

Conversations need to be conversations and not taken personal if you can do that you can converse, if you can’t then kindly just follow the topic or exit with peace

Bong Dee - @Muhammad... 😂🤣😂 thats a fact and the truth. Truth will set me free. If you can't take it then leave

It's better they know the truth. So when Judgment day come they had been warned about Muhammad, that includes you.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "see you really don't read the Bible to know the truth."

Meanwhile, I've read the KJV of the bible from cover-to-cover twice.

Bong Dee - @Muhammad... good you've read it. But did you listen to Jesus?

Bong Dee - @Clinton... no we are taught to warn others of a false prophets and their teachings. You think im passing judgment. No! that's not my task, that's Jesus task during Judgment Day. And if you don't warn others about false prophet Muhammad then it will be against you...

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "I am sorry for you"

Because I bear witness that there is no god but the One God and Muhammad (pbuh) is His messenger? Weird.

Bong wrote: "because your going to hell"

Do you still worship a human being as a co-deity in perfect imitation of the pagans? Oh, okay.

Bong wrote: "and you don't know who are you dealing."

Psh. Trust me, I do. lol

Bong wrote: "Why is he a pervert, an adulterer, a pedophile, a womanizer and a false prophet."

He's not.

Bong wrote: "So let's start, Jesus and Moses taught that a man and a woman can marry the two will be one."

How would YOU know? Your book is compromised according to your very own scholars, so...

...yeah. You may as well be passing along National Inquirer rag gossip.

Bong wrote: "Muhammad said you abdools can marry 4"

The One God granted permission to marry up to four during certain strict circumstances, and never for lust.

Bong wrote: "this is in fact against Jesus and Moses teachings"

How would YOU know? lol

Bong wrote: "Furthermore he married more than 4 so his indeed a pervert and an adulterer."

He was allowed to marry more as the leader of the community, with the perks that come from being the leader of the community.

Bong wrote: "What is more demonic he married little Aisha that pedophilia"

Pedophilia is illegal. It clearly wasn't illegal in 7th century Arabia.

Bong wrote: "and that's why his a false prophet because Jesus and Moses never taught that a man can marry a little girl."

What did that have to do with the prophethood? It's not even a religious item.

Bong wrote: "Only with a woman so that age is about 14 to 18 years old."

Both Semite nations married off women as soon as they reached puberty. You're talking out of your neck.

Bong Dee - @Muhammad... brainwashed is done for you and your going to hell because your stuuupid to believe Muhammad instead of Jesus of the Bible. We have been telling you Muhammad is a false prophet no pedophile can enter heaven ...only hell with Satan. And yeah your going there too...

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "because your stuuupid to believe Muhammad instead of Jesus"

The Islamic Pillar called "BELIEF IN THE PROPHETS" means I actually believe in them both equally. 😉 But thanks for playing!

Bong Dee - and i bear witness that the Father in heaven is not your allah. And Jesus is the Son of God who became like man to bring the good news from the Father in heaven.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "and i bear witness that the Father in heaven is not your allah."

Allah says otherwise, and He is the All-Powerful Master of the Day of Judgment. Should I accept His Word, or yours?

Bong wrote: "And Jesus is the Son of God who became like man"

Based on what? 🤨 Why do you believe this clear pagan tripe?

Bong Dee - 🤣😂🤣allah is useless against a hungry goat who ate part of Quran 🤣😂🤣

Muhammad Rasheed - Do you believe that particular hadith is worthy of your pure blind faith to believe it was actually true? 🤔 Is that what all the giggling emojis mean?

Do you think your 'divine son Jesus' lives in that hadith to make it worthy of your unquestionable, uncritical pure blind faith in it? Why?

Bong Dee - 🤣😂🤣 so you mean to say hadiths are not reliable? Just like Muhammad and his heresies and lies in Quran?... same 💩💩💩🤣🤣🤣

We don't need you hadiths or Quran bcoz all are 💩💩🤣🤣🤣tons of lies and heresy no truth.

My faith is with Jesus and the bible because the most of the writers of the NT bible and especially the Gospels were actual eyewitness of Jesus🤣🤣😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "so you mean to say hadiths are not reliable?"

The collected volumes of ahadith represent the most material about an historical figure ever compiled. From the, we have a nearly complete picture about the entire life of Muhammad (pbuh), something we can't say about any of religious founder. Not everything said about the prophet is true (the hadith are scholarly works collected from the memories of the people passed down from the prophet's day and never pretend to be revealed from God), but much of it is impressively accurate.

Bong wrote: "Just like Muhammad and his heresies and lies in Quran?... same"

There are no heresies and lies in the Qur'an. Unlike the body of hadith literature, the Qur'an is the inerrant Word of God and is pure revelation preserved.

Bong wrote: "We don't need you hadiths or Quran bcoz"

You do need it if you hold hope of winning through to heaven. It will be impossible for you to do so without repenting and converting to Al-Islam.

Bong wrote: "My faith is with Jesus"

Jesus was Muslim, as were all the prophets of God. Your faith is a twisted pagan distortion authorized by Constantine's councils.

Bong wrote: "and the bible"

The bible is a corrupt fabricated document written by anonymous evangelicals centuries after Jesus' mission. Your people have failed you and that's why the Qur'an was revealed.

Bong wrote: "because the most of the writers of the NT bible and especially the Gospels were actual eyewitness of Jesus"

lol Your actual believing New Testament scholars disagree with you (see attached graphic). You lack any support whatsoever for your tissue paper beliefs.

Muhammad Rasheed - Now please explain why you keep bringing up the "hungry goat" hadith as if you 100% believe it is real despite it being poorly supported in the Islamic literature.

It seems to mean a lot more to you (who continuously cites it) than it does to the actual Muslims. Why?

Bong Dee - 🤣😂😂did it mention who witnessed Muhammad and Jesus talking to each other? Did it mentioned who witnessed Muhammad in Jerusalem? 😂😂😂

Bong Dee - 😂😂🤣😂and you would rather believe this pedophile illiterate pervert Muhammad more than those who saw Jesus with his disciples with their own eyes? 😂🤣😂

Bong Dee - 😂🤣😂its not only the story of the hungry goats because you have no complete old Quranic manuscripts. You have six but none is complete. The one you read was based on the hafs 1924 canonized quran which the Saudi government as Cairo to print into a book😂😂😂

And they are based on 6 of Quran manuscripts these are not even the Utthman version. 😂😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "🤣😂😂"

I'm going to assume all of this random giggling is related to fentanyl.

Bong wrote: "did it mention who witnessed Muhammad and Jesus talking to each other? Did it mentioned who witnessed Muhammad in Jerusalem?"

It's also genuinely weird to see a supposedly believing Christian blindly parrot an atheist argument point. I could just as easily ask you who witnessed Paul's Damascus Road vision, or the satan trying to tempt the Christ (pbuh), right? I won't go there because it would make me an idiot, too.

Bong wrote: "😂😂😂"

You should try checking into one of those drug rehabilitation clinics. They can fix you.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "😂😂🤣😂"

More fentanyl?

Bong wrote: "and you would rather believe this pedophile"

Why would I believe he was a pedophile? That doesn't even make sense in context. Do you expect me to just side with my pagan mortal enemy and take your hostile, biased, and xenophobic interpretation of my stuff? Why would I do that? You demonstrably hate the truth.

Bong wrote: "illiterate"

He needed to be illiterate to fulfill the Deut. 18:18 prophecy. That's why so many of the learned Jews converted to Islam in the earliest days.

Bong wrote: "pervert"

??? Do you even know what that means? How does that slur apply to the prophet of God? 🤨

Bong wrote: "Muhammad more than those who saw Jesus with his disciples with their own eyes? 😂🤣😂"

You're giggling off another fentanyl hit like I'm the one who made up that your book is compromised. You should actually read the placard I provided. Those are believing Christian scholars admitting that everything you were led to believe about the new testament is actually a fiction. This is the Christian scholarship official position, not the mean ole Muslim position. Clean your own house.

Bong Dee - 🤣😂😂 I'm not a zombie like you who take drugs. Atheist who? You think i will just copy them without doing my own research? Your stuuupid assumption only prove your low IQ😂😂😂😂 i laugh and this emoji tells it because your low IQ validated that you are a slave of Muhammad lies😂😂😂

Here you are attacking me instead of answering and defending Muhammad if he really meet Jesus and who were the witnesses. Only prove your low IQ😂🤣😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "😂🤣😂"

You're going to overdose on Facebook in front of everybody. lol

Bong wrote: "its not only the story of the hungry goats"

This is not a true story. You haven't answered why you have such intense blind faith in it.

Bong wrote: "because you have no complete old Quranic manuscripts."

Of course we do. lol

Bong wrote: "You have six but none is complete."

You don't even know what that means in context. You just heard a piece of misinformation on an anti-Islam hate site and you are now blindly parroting it without even being able to defend it.

Bong wrote: "The one you read was based on the hafs 1924 canonized quran which the Saudi government as Cairo to print into a book"

You don't know what "haf" means and you don't realize you're making yourself a fool in public.

Bong wrote: "😂😂😂"

lol smh

Bong wrote: "And they are based on 6 of Quran manuscripts these are not even the Utthman version. 😂😂😂"

You have no idea what any of that means.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "🤣😂😂 I'm not a zombie like you who take drugs."

Then why are you giggling for literally no reason like a drug addict, hm?

Bong wrote: "Atheist who? You think i will just copy them without doing my own research?"

That describes the behavior of every single Christian in these 'debate' chat groups. I doubt you even know what research even means.

Bong wrote: "Your stuuupid assumption"

This is experience, son.

Bong wrote: "only prove your low IQ😂😂😂😂 i laugh and this emoji tells it because your low IQ validated that you are a slave of Muhammad lies😂😂😂"

Is this the extent of your counter-response? Because it seems like its all you have.

Bong wrote: "Here you are attacking me"

It's not my fault you don't have a real argument, and think that a normal debate question is an "attack."

Bong wrote: "instead of answering"

Why do you believe that "goat eating" hadith is actually real? Why do you have total blind faith in it when the Muslims themselves don't? Can you answer?

Bong wrote: "and defending Muhammad if he really meet Jesus and who were the witnesses."

I don't have to "defend" that at all. It doesn't even make sense to ask that question from theist-to-theist. This is literally an atheist's argument.

Bong wrote: "Only prove your low IQ😂🤣😂"

Who were the witnesses to Paul's Damascus Road vision? Who were the witnesses to the satan tempting Jesus (pbuh)? 🙄

Bong Dee- 🤣🤣😂because i pity your intelligence you seems intelligent by why follow and illiterate? Worst his a pedophile pervert 🤣😂

Tell me can Muhammad read Arabic? How can he read Greek and Hebrew? Because the Bible were written in Hebrew and Greek.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "🤣🤣😂because i pity your intelligence"

You're saying this while conspicuously ducking all the debate questions you're afraid to answer. I see.

Bong wrote: "you seems intelligent by why follow and illiterate?"

God needed him to be illiterate. If he was educated, he would try to put his own spin on the revelation instead of only "speaking the Words that God put in his mouth and commanded him to speak" per the Deut. 18:18 prophecy.

Bong wrote: "Worst his a pedophile pervert 🤣😂"

He was neither of these.

Bong wrote: "Tell me can Muhammad read Arabic?"

Nope.

Bong wrote: "How can he read Greek and Hebrew?"

He couldn't.

Bong wrote: "Because the Bible were written in Hebrew and Greek."

The prophet wasn't learned in scripture at all. He only spoke what was revealed for him to speak.

Bong Dee - Deuteronomy 18 18 speaks about the prophet to come and he must be an Israelite like Moses. Is Muhammad an Israelite? No! So Muhammad is not the prophet they know will come.

Continue Deuteronomy 18 19 its says you must listen to him or be accountable or curse if not. Question who was the prophet whom we must listen? Muhammad? No! Because can't even show himself or talk to Muhammad.

Is it Jesus? Yes! Because God the Father twice in the gospels told his Jesus disciples to listen to Jesus. Twice, first during Jesus baptism by John the Baptist and second during Jesus transfiguration. The voice from heaven told John the Baptist, Peter, John, and James to listen to Jesus...see verse below...

"While he was still speaking, a bright cloud covered them, and a voice from the cloud said, 'This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased. Listen to him!'" ~(Matthew 17:5)

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "Deuteronomy 18 18 speaks about the prophet to come"

lol He already came. That was Muhammad (pbuh).

Bong wrote: "and he must be an Israelite like Moses."

Not so. Muhammad fit the "like Moses" criteria.

Bong wrote: "Is Muhammad an Israelite? No!"

No need.

Bong wrote: "So Muhammad is not the prophet they know will come."

Sure he is.

Bong wrote: "Continue Deuteronomy 18 19 its says you must listen to him or be accountable or curse if not."

I listen to Muhammad, but you don't. That means, you are cursed.

Bong wrote: "Question who was the prophet whom we must listen? Muhammad?"

Of course.

Bong wrote: "No! Because can't even show himself or talk to Muhammad."

lol You could if you lived in the time/place he showed up in.

Bong wrote: "Is it Jesus?"

No. Jesus was not like Moses. See graphic.

Bong Dee - 😂🤣😂 I don't need to explain to fools like you🤣🤣😂no you've read Deuteronomy 18:18-19. And had shown you the verse that you must listen to Jesus. The accountability is now on you if you still deny Jesus.

And Muhammad was never a brethren or brothers to Israelites his an Arab you fool🤣😂😂

How is Jesus same like Moses ..see below😂🤣😂 Muhammad is a false prophet 😂🤣😂😂a pedophile like Muhammad is a💩💩💩 to the society 😂🤣😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "I don't need to explain to fools like you"

That's called cowardly ducking the questions in a debate, while pretending it's something else. Should I blame that on your fentanyl addiction, too?

Bong wrote: "🤣🤣😂"

😏

Bong wrote: "no you've read Deuteronomy 18:18-19."

Sure, did.

Bong wrote: "And had shown you the verse that you must listen to Jesus."

That is a fiction.

Bong wrote: "The accountability is now on you if you still deny Jesus."

In the Qur'an, God explains what He revealed to Jesus, and He quoted the summary of what Jesus taught. There's a reason God mentions Jesus a lot in the final revelation and it corrects the errors that your people were falsely led to believe.

Bong wrote: "And Muhammad was never a brethren or brothers to Israelites his an Arab you fool🤣😂😂"

The Arab nation under Ishmael (pbuh) are the brethren nation under Isaac (pbuh).

Bong wrote: "How is Jesus same like Moses"

I already explained how using my chart.

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂tell me, Muhammad's prophesy in Quran. If his a true prophet he must pass Deuteronomy 18:20. Otherwise, his just a false prophet and deserve to die like 💩😂😂😂

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂 Moses can speak to YHWH face to face see Exodus 33 11 😂😂😂 Muhammad who saw him talked to allah face to face? A flying donkey? 😂😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "tell me, Muhammad's prophesy in Quran"

The Roman Byzantines just lost a battle with the Persian Sassanids, but the Qur’an made a bold claim stating (30:1-5) "that the Byzantines would make a huge comeback against the Sassanids within 3 to 9 years. Of course, the prophecy did come true despite this. After about 7 years from the Byzantines defeat, they made a huge comeback and started to take back all of the lands they lost (bit.ly/4ah9O0Z)" even though at the time of the Qur'an prediction, the feat seemed impossible.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "If his a true prophet he must pass Deuteronomy 18:20. Otherwise, his just a false prophet and deserve to die like 💩"

You mean the way Paul died? 🤔

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂paul never claimed his a prophet 😂😂😂but Muhammad says he is... You only posted one stuupid prophesy 😂😂😂you think i can just accept it only one your a joke like your stuuupid prophet 😂😂😂😂

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂the Romans defeated when? It's just 💩💩💩 and who is Alif. Lam. Mim? 😂😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "the Romans defeated when?"

620 A.D.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "paul never claimed his a prophet"

Didn't he claim to receive visions from God? Doesn't your "holy book" consist mostly of Paul's letters that you believe are the "divinely-inspired Word of God?"

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂are you crazy defeated by who? 620 AD 😂😂😂When did Muhammad became a prophet? Do you understand what is a real prophet of the bible?

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂 boy there are divine ministry it's not prophesy. Like Paul his a preacher and a teacher too. Others like gift of healing, other like Solomon is gift of wisdom. David had kingship, leadership and humility. There are many more. You need to read the Bible to understand it...

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "defeated by who?"

The Persian Sassanids.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "When did Muhammad became a prophet?"

When he was 40 yrs old.

Bong wrote: "Do you understand what is a real prophet of the bible?"

Do you understand anything at all? It honestly doesn't seem like it.

Bong wrote: "there are divine ministry it's not prophesy"

You're babbling. Why do you think I would value your opinion of your corrupted book? I don't care what you think about religion and spirituality. You're not a smart person.

Bong Dee - 😂 at what age was Muhammad when he did this prophesy or at what year this prophesy was told? When did it came true?

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "at what age was Muhammad when he did this prophesy"

The prophet was 50 yrs old at the time of that revelation.

Bong wrote: "When did it came true?"

A few years later.

Bong Dee - if Muhammad was 50 that means to say this happened in 620AD. But the Persian defeated the Romans in 613AD. So you mean this is the fulfillment of his prophesy. Do you agree?

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "Do you agree?"

lol Are you trying to finagle the dates I chose to fake prove the historical event didn't actually happen?

Bong Dee - that's why i am checking the timeline if i am not wrong? My estimate maybe wrong do enlighten me...

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "My estimate maybe wrong do enlighten me..."

Remember in the beginning of this bit, when you assumed the prophet Muhammad didn't make any predictions that were revealed by Allah in the Qur'an, and you giggled until you found out you were wrong? And now you find yourself desperately trying to figure out how to fix the dates of the Byzantine–Sasanian War to prove it wrong in your mind somehow?

This is the part that's most interesting to me -- watching your cognitive dissonance eat away at your anti-Islam worldview.

Muhammad Rasheed - Hey, where did all of your giggling emojis go? Hm?

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂i told you already 1 prophesy doesn't make him a true prophet 😂😂😂 my emojis are still there.

Bong Dee - and you didn't give answer to my question. So do you agree that he prophesied it in 620 AD? When Muhammad was about 50 yrs old. Do you agree?

Muhammad Rasheed - He actually made lots of prophecies. That one is most highlighted because it was an actual big deal—literally NO ONE thought the Byzantines could recover from that defeat—and put in the Qur'an itself for everyone to marvel at. Earlier, you didn't know he had made ANY prophecies, so even one prophecy that came true, that secular university historians discuss regularly, is quite significant. Your effort to downplay that significance only demonstrates your confirmed lack of personal integrity.

Muhammad Rasheed - I see the emojis came back right on cue. 😏

Muhammad Rasheed - They seem to lack the same gleeful mirth as before. I wonder why?

Bong Dee - 😂😂 my emojis are always there.

Bong Dee - so answer me. Did Muhammad prophesied that the Persian will defeat the Romans in 620AD, his about 50 yrs old. Do you agree?😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "my emojis are always there"

Always? Here's the exact moment when they disappeared, where you got noticeably uncomfortable at the realization that you are 100% wrong about the prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

Muhammad Rasheed - Even just before that, they dropped down from an average of six to one. lol

Muhammad Rasheed - How does this feel? To find out you were literally wrong about EVERYTHING and actually chose the wrong religion? Huh?

Do you feel the butterflies in your stomach churning around? Tell me.

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂 you can't answer the question because your prophet is a false prophet😂😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - He's still a 'false prophet' even though he went around prophesizing events that came true, huh? Interesting how the Christian mind works, isn't it? Huh. #Fascinating

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂 Persians defeated the Romans in 613AD. So if Muhammad prophesied it in 620AD. That means it's already past. So it means his a false prophet💩💩 😂😂😂

By the time he prophesied the Romans had decisively defeated the Persians in 620AD. So his prophesy is still wrong 😂😂😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "Persians defeated the Romans in 613AD. So if Muhammad prophesied it"

You're confused (again). After the Persians defeat them, the Qur'an predicts that the Byzantines will come back and win. THAT'S the prediction. Pay attention, please.

Obviously, you're so desperately trying to figure out how to save face, it's making you even sloppier than you are normally.