A Slow Leakage in Your False Confidence

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "A Slow Leakage in Your False Confidence.'" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 2024 [cartoon pending]. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

*************************************************

Clinton Mannathoko - As a non-Muslim I admire the fact that Islam seems to be spot on, the Muslims memorise the Quran, they pray 5 times a day, they practice their faith a lot, but if you ask us Christians we go to church once a week and sin every hour we can, Islam is a force

Itß Yœùñg Mõõßã Munowelenkhu - I wonder because if someone goes to work he / she go every day but we forget to worship to God gave us everything for Free but choose to work every day for world material.

Clinton Mannathoko - @Itß... its human of us we forget but Muslims just make it a point to make this apart of who they are

Anthony McCullough - @Clinton... You speak for All Christian now 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Clinton Mannathoko - @Anthony... it’s my view, you could always add your input. They are a resilient people and you see that in them with the genocide in Gaza, no people would stand that psychological and mentally it’s just horrible but they stand strong cause of the constant implementation of their faith

Anthony McCullough - you stated Christiana like you are the spokesperson for all Christians. You can't possibly have a view about what all Christians do or believe stop kidding yourself

Zak Bungwon - @Clinton... Admiration adds nothing of value; why not become one, if you think you can be guaranteed of life here, & in the hereafter!

But, remember that, even Muhammad (saw) died with the uncertainty of not knowing what would be done with him, let alone with his companions & followers! Shine your eyes!🙏

Clinton Mannathoko - @Zak... yes and that follows his belief that he isn’t God and he is merely a man, I see nothing wrong there

Zak Bungwon - Yes, you may see nothing wrong with it, if you too don't know what will be done with you! So, why not just become what you admire, since there's no law of apostasy forcing you to remain where you now are?!🤷‍♂️

Clinton Mannathoko - I find it hard sometimes to understand the Nigerian Dialogue it throws me off a little but fear not my brother I am putting it together. So your statement is that Muhammad did not know what is to happen to him? And I admire a religion that doesn’t give guarantee of heaven by just having faith alone but by works they resemble their faith, I think that’s what you are sayijg

Zak Bungwon - No, I actually mean you should be what you admire, if there's nothing superior about what you now are, and there's nothing forcing you to be where & what you now are!

Muhammad Rasheed - Clinton wrote: "So your statement is that Muhammad did not know what is to happen to him? And I admire a religion that doesn’t give guarantee of heaven by just having faith alone but by works they resemble their faith, I think that’s what you are sayijg"

In the Qur'an, numerous times Allah told the prophet that he was doing a great job and his reward was assured. Allah also told the prophet ("Say:") to tell the people that he was only a warner who had no insider knowledge of the unseen. Our debate opponents like to use the latter part of that to pretend that the prophet didn't know whether he was going to paradise or not, when that's clearly not the case.

Clinton Mannathoko - @Muhammad... I admire Him and from the start I mentioned that Islam is undoubtedly the religion to go to. Quran seems to have things straight and we Christians attack two things about Islam first being his marriage to little Aisha at 6 years of age and 2 the virgins that Muslims are promised if they die in war

Muhammad Rasheed - Clinton wrote: "his marriage to little Aisha at 6 years of age"

I don't even understand why the African community are even bringing it up, considering many of their own cultures mimic that of the two Semite nations when it comes to the Age of Consent. In the numerous cultures around the globe and throughout history that greatly valued having a LOT of children in their families, marrying women off the second they hit puberty is the go-to move. This is not even a religious item they are griping over, it was just the societal norm in 7th century Arabia. In addition to this, the prophet and his close inner circle—the four members of the proto-Rashidun Caliphate (Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman & Ali)—all agreed to marry into one another's families to tighten their deep friendships with ties of kinship. I honestly thought that was pretty cool (albeit alien to my 21st century USA sensibilities). I think it's petty for atheists and Christians to attempt to make a big deal about it. The fact that the Jews are conspicuously quiet as church mice on the issue amuses me.

Clinton wrote: "and 2 the virgins that Muslims are promised if they die in war"

I can't even pretend to understand what the argument against that is. I just got killed in a war I stood up in FOR GOD, but I can't have a couple of magical, immortal wives that no one else touched? In heaven? Why not? lol

Bong Dee - @Clinton... As a Christian we advise you to stay away from the teachings of a sinful man like Muhammad. No pervert pedophile adulterer womanizer murderer and false prophet like Muhammad goes to heaven.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "As a Christian we advise you to stay away from the teachings of a sinful man like Muhammad."

His teachings were to worship the One God of Abraham (pbuh) alone, to do good, reject evil and repent when you mess up. You hate that, huh?

Bong wrote: "No pervert"

The prophet wasn't a pervert.

Bong wrote: "pedophile"

The prophet wasn't a pedophile.

Bong wrote: "adulterer"

The prophet wasn't an adulterer.

Bong wrote: "womanizer"

The prophet wasn't a womanizer.

Bong wrote: "murderer"

The prophet wasn't a murderer.

Bong wrote: "and false prophet"

The prophet wasn't false. His teachings were to worship the One God of Abraham (pbuh) alone, to do good, reject evil and repent when you mess up. Does that sound "false" as an Abrahamic theist?

Bong Dee - @Muhammad... see you really don't read the Bible to know the truth. I am sorry for you because your going to hell and you don't know who are you dealing. Why is he a pervert, an adulterer, a pedophile, a womanizer and a false prophet.

So let's start, Jesus and Moses taught that a man and a woman can marry the two will be one. Muhammad said you abdools can marry 4, this is in fact against Jesus and Moses teachings so this is a perversion of their teachings. Furthermore he married more than 4 so his indeed a pervert and an adulterer. What is more demonic he married little Aisha that pedophilia and that's why his a false prophet because Jesus and Moses never taught that a man can marry a little girl. Only with a woman so that age is about 14 to 18 years old. He married Aisha when she was 6 yrs old only a pervert will marry a little girl 😂😂😂😂

Clinton Mannathoko - @Bong... you aren’t judge to say where someone is going so don’t pass out verdicts, here we are men and we let God do what he does.

Conversations need to be conversations and not taken personal if you can do that you can converse, if you can’t then kindly just follow the topic or exit with peace

Bong Dee - @Muhammad... 😂🤣😂 thats a fact and the truth. Truth will set me free. If you can't take it then leave

It's better they know the truth. So when Judgment day come they had been warned about Muhammad, that includes you.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "see you really don't read the Bible to know the truth."

Meanwhile, I've read the KJV of the bible from cover-to-cover twice.

Bong Dee - @Muhammad... good you've read it. But did you listen to Jesus?

Bong Dee - @Clinton... no we are taught to warn others of a false prophets and their teachings. You think im passing judgment. No! that's not my task, that's Jesus task during Judgment Day. And if you don't warn others about false prophet Muhammad then it will be against you...

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "I am sorry for you"

Because I bear witness that there is no god but the One God and Muhammad (pbuh) is His messenger? Weird.

Bong wrote: "because your going to hell"

Do you still worship a human being as a co-deity in perfect imitation of the pagans? Oh, okay.

Bong wrote: "and you don't know who are you dealing."

Psh. Trust me, I do. lol

Bong wrote: "Why is he a pervert, an adulterer, a pedophile, a womanizer and a false prophet."

He's not.

Bong wrote: "So let's start, Jesus and Moses taught that a man and a woman can marry the two will be one."

How would YOU know? Your book is compromised according to your very own scholars, so...

...yeah. You may as well be passing along National Inquirer rag gossip.

Bong wrote: "Muhammad said you abdools can marry 4"

The One God granted permission to marry up to four during certain strict circumstances, and never for lust.

Bong wrote: "this is in fact against Jesus and Moses teachings"

How would YOU know? lol

Bong wrote: "Furthermore he married more than 4 so his indeed a pervert and an adulterer."

He was allowed to marry more as the leader of the community, with the perks that come from being the leader of the community.

Bong wrote: "What is more demonic he married little Aisha that pedophilia"

Pedophilia is illegal. It clearly wasn't illegal in 7th century Arabia.

Bong wrote: "and that's why his a false prophet because Jesus and Moses never taught that a man can marry a little girl."

What did that have to do with the prophethood? It's not even a religious item.

Bong wrote: "Only with a woman so that age is about 14 to 18 years old."

Both Semite nations married off women as soon as they reached puberty. You're talking out of your neck.

Bong Dee - @Muhammad... brainwashed is done for you and your going to hell because your stuuupid to believe Muhammad instead of Jesus of the Bible. We have been telling you Muhammad is a false prophet no pedophile can enter heaven ...only hell with Satan. And yeah your going there too...

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "because your stuuupid to believe Muhammad instead of Jesus"

The Islamic Pillar called "BELIEF IN THE PROPHETS" means I actually believe in them both equally. 😉 But thanks for playing!

Bong Dee - and i bear witness that the Father in heaven is not your allah. And Jesus is the Son of God who became like man to bring the good news from the Father in heaven.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "and i bear witness that the Father in heaven is not your allah."

Allah says otherwise, and He is the All-Powerful Master of the Day of Judgment. Should I accept His Word, or yours?

Bong wrote: "And Jesus is the Son of God who became like man"

Based on what? 🤨 Why do you believe this clear pagan tripe?

Bong Dee - 🤣😂🤣allah is useless against a hungry goat who ate part of Quran 🤣😂🤣

Muhammad Rasheed - Do you believe that particular hadith is worthy of your pure blind faith to believe it was actually true? 🤔 Is that what all the giggling emojis mean?

Do you think your 'divine son Jesus' lives in that hadith to make it worthy of your unquestionable, uncritical pure blind faith in it? Why?

Bong Dee - 🤣😂🤣 so you mean to say hadiths are not reliable? Just like Muhammad and his heresies and lies in Quran?... same 💩💩💩🤣🤣🤣

We don't need you hadiths or Quran bcoz all are 💩💩🤣🤣🤣tons of lies and heresy no truth.

My faith is with Jesus and the bible because the most of the writers of the NT bible and especially the Gospels were actual eyewitness of Jesus🤣🤣😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "so you mean to say hadiths are not reliable?"

The collected volumes of ahadith represent the most material about an historical figure ever compiled. From the, we have a nearly complete picture about the entire life of Muhammad (pbuh), something we can't say about any of religious founder. Not everything said about the prophet is true (the hadith are scholarly works collected from the memories of the people passed down from the prophet's day and never pretend to be revealed from God), but much of it is impressively accurate.

Bong wrote: "Just like Muhammad and his heresies and lies in Quran?... same"

There are no heresies and lies in the Qur'an. Unlike the body of hadith literature, the Qur'an is the inerrant Word of God and is pure revelation preserved.

Bong wrote: "We don't need you hadiths or Quran bcoz"

You do need it if you hold hope of winning through to heaven. It will be impossible for you to do so without repenting and converting to Al-Islam.

Bong wrote: "My faith is with Jesus"

Jesus was Muslim, as were all the prophets of God. Your faith is a twisted pagan distortion authorized by Constantine's councils.

Bong wrote: "and the bible"

The bible is a corrupt fabricated document written by anonymous evangelicals centuries after Jesus' mission. Your people have failed you and that's why the Qur'an was revealed.

Bong wrote: "because the most of the writers of the NT bible and especially the Gospels were actual eyewitness of Jesus"

lol Your actual believing New Testament scholars disagree with you (see attached graphic). You lack any support whatsoever for your tissue paper beliefs.

Muhammad Rasheed - Now please explain why you keep bringing up the "hungry goat" hadith as if you 100% believe it is real despite it being poorly supported in the Islamic literature.

It seems to mean a lot more to you (who continuously cites it) than it does to the actual Muslims. Why?

Bong Dee - 🤣😂😂did it mention who witnessed Muhammad and Jesus talking to each other? Did it mentioned who witnessed Muhammad in Jerusalem? 😂😂😂

Bong Dee - 😂😂🤣😂and you would rather believe this pedophile illiterate pervert Muhammad more than those who saw Jesus with his disciples with their own eyes? 😂🤣😂

Bong Dee - 😂🤣😂its not only the story of the hungry goats because you have no complete old Quranic manuscripts. You have six but none is complete. The one you read was based on the hafs 1924 canonized quran which the Saudi government as Cairo to print into a book😂😂😂

And they are based on 6 of Quran manuscripts these are not even the Utthman version. 😂😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "🤣😂😂"

I'm going to assume all of this random giggling is related to fentanyl.

Bong wrote: "did it mention who witnessed Muhammad and Jesus talking to each other? Did it mentioned who witnessed Muhammad in Jerusalem?"

It's also genuinely weird to see a supposedly believing Christian blindly parrot an atheist argument point. I could just as easily ask you who witnessed Paul's Damascus Road vision, or the satan trying to tempt the Christ (pbuh), right? I won't go there because it would make me an idiot, too.

Bong wrote: "😂😂😂"

You should try checking into one of those drug rehabilitation clinics. They can fix you.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "😂😂🤣😂"

More fentanyl?

Bong wrote: "and you would rather believe this pedophile"

Why would I believe he was a pedophile? That doesn't even make sense in context. Do you expect me to just side with my pagan mortal enemy and take your hostile, biased, and xenophobic interpretation of my stuff? Why would I do that? You demonstrably hate the truth.

Bong wrote: "illiterate"

He needed to be illiterate to fulfill the Deut. 18:18 prophecy. That's why so many of the learned Jews converted to Islam in the earliest days.

Bong wrote: "pervert"

??? Do you even know what that means? How does that slur apply to the prophet of God? 🤨

Bong wrote: "Muhammad more than those who saw Jesus with his disciples with their own eyes? 😂🤣😂"

You're giggling off another fentanyl hit like I'm the one who made up that your book is compromised. You should actually read the placard I provided. Those are believing Christian scholars admitting that everything you were led to believe about the new testament is actually a fiction. This is the Christian scholarship official position, not the mean ole Muslim position. Clean your own house.

Bong Dee - 🤣😂😂 I'm not a zombie like you who take drugs. Atheist who? You think i will just copy them without doing my own research? Your stuuupid assumption only prove your low IQ😂😂😂😂 i laugh and this emoji tells it because your low IQ validated that you are a slave of Muhammad lies😂😂😂

Here you are attacking me instead of answering and defending Muhammad if he really meet Jesus and who were the witnesses. Only prove your low IQ😂🤣😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "😂🤣😂"

You're going to overdose on Facebook in front of everybody. lol

Bong wrote: "its not only the story of the hungry goats"

This is not a true story. You haven't answered why you have such intense blind faith in it.

Bong wrote: "because you have no complete old Quranic manuscripts."

Of course we do. lol

Bong wrote: "You have six but none is complete."

You don't even know what that means in context. You just heard a piece of misinformation on an anti-Islam hate site and you are now blindly parroting it without even being able to defend it.

Bong wrote: "The one you read was based on the hafs 1924 canonized quran which the Saudi government as Cairo to print into a book"

You don't know what "haf" means and you don't realize you're making yourself a fool in public.

Bong wrote: "😂😂😂"

lol smh

Bong wrote: "And they are based on 6 of Quran manuscripts these are not even the Utthman version. 😂😂😂"

You have no idea what any of that means.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "🤣😂😂 I'm not a zombie like you who take drugs."

Then why are you giggling for literally no reason like a drug addict, hm?

Bong wrote: "Atheist who? You think i will just copy them without doing my own research?"

That describes the behavior of every single Christian in these 'debate' chat groups. I doubt you even know what research even means.

Bong wrote: "Your stuuupid assumption"

This is experience, son.

Bong wrote: "only prove your low IQ😂😂😂😂 i laugh and this emoji tells it because your low IQ validated that you are a slave of Muhammad lies😂😂😂"

Is this the extent of your counter-response? Because it seems like its all you have.

Bong wrote: "Here you are attacking me"

It's not my fault you don't have a real argument, and think that a normal debate question is an "attack."

Bong wrote: "instead of answering"

Why do you believe that "goat eating" hadith is actually real? Why do you have total blind faith in it when the Muslims themselves don't? Can you answer?

Bong wrote: "and defending Muhammad if he really meet Jesus and who were the witnesses."

I don't have to "defend" that at all. It doesn't even make sense to ask that question from theist-to-theist. This is literally an atheist's argument.

Bong wrote: "Only prove your low IQ😂🤣😂"

Who were the witnesses to Paul's Damascus Road vision? Who were the witnesses to the satan tempting Jesus (pbuh)? 🙄

Bong Dee- 🤣🤣😂because i pity your intelligence you seems intelligent by why follow and illiterate? Worst his a pedophile pervert 🤣😂

Tell me can Muhammad read Arabic? How can he read Greek and Hebrew? Because the Bible were written in Hebrew and Greek.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "🤣🤣😂because i pity your intelligence"

You're saying this while conspicuously ducking all the debate questions you're afraid to answer. I see.

Bong wrote: "you seems intelligent by why follow and illiterate?"

God needed him to be illiterate. If he was educated, he would try to put his own spin on the revelation instead of only "speaking the Words that God put in his mouth and commanded him to speak" per the Deut. 18:18 prophecy.

Bong wrote: "Worst his a pedophile pervert 🤣😂"

He was neither of these.

Bong wrote: "Tell me can Muhammad read Arabic?"

Nope.

Bong wrote: "How can he read Greek and Hebrew?"

He couldn't.

Bong wrote: "Because the Bible were written in Hebrew and Greek."

The prophet wasn't learned in scripture at all. He only spoke what was revealed for him to speak.

Bong Dee - Deuteronomy 18 18 speaks about the prophet to come and he must be an Israelite like Moses. Is Muhammad an Israelite? No! So Muhammad is not the prophet they know will come.

Continue Deuteronomy 18 19 its says you must listen to him or be accountable or curse if not. Question who was the prophet whom we must listen? Muhammad? No! Because can't even show himself or talk to Muhammad.

Is it Jesus? Yes! Because God the Father twice in the gospels told his Jesus disciples to listen to Jesus. Twice, first during Jesus baptism by John the Baptist and second during Jesus transfiguration. The voice from heaven told John the Baptist, Peter, John, and James to listen to Jesus...see verse below...

"While he was still speaking, a bright cloud covered them, and a voice from the cloud said, 'This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased. Listen to him!'" ~(Matthew 17:5)

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "Deuteronomy 18 18 speaks about the prophet to come"

lol He already came. That was Muhammad (pbuh).

Bong wrote: "and he must be an Israelite like Moses."

Not so. Muhammad fit the "like Moses" criteria.

Bong wrote: "Is Muhammad an Israelite? No!"

No need.

Bong wrote: "So Muhammad is not the prophet they know will come."

Sure he is.

Bong wrote: "Continue Deuteronomy 18 19 its says you must listen to him or be accountable or curse if not."

I listen to Muhammad, but you don't. That means, you are cursed.

Bong wrote: "Question who was the prophet whom we must listen? Muhammad?"

Of course.

Bong wrote: "No! Because can't even show himself or talk to Muhammad."

lol You could if you lived in the time/place he showed up in.

Bong wrote: "Is it Jesus?"

No. Jesus was not like Moses. See graphic.

Bong Dee - 😂🤣😂 I don't need to explain to fools like you🤣🤣😂no you've read Deuteronomy 18:18-19. And had shown you the verse that you must listen to Jesus. The accountability is now on you if you still deny Jesus.

And Muhammad was never a brethren or brothers to Israelites his an Arab you fool🤣😂😂

How is Jesus same like Moses ..see below😂🤣😂 Muhammad is a false prophet 😂🤣😂😂a pedophile like Muhammad is a💩💩💩 to the society 😂🤣😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "I don't need to explain to fools like you"

That's called cowardly ducking the questions in a debate, while pretending it's something else. Should I blame that on your fentanyl addiction, too?

Bong wrote: "🤣🤣😂"

😏

Bong wrote: "no you've read Deuteronomy 18:18-19."

Sure, did.

Bong wrote: "And had shown you the verse that you must listen to Jesus."

That is a fiction.

Bong wrote: "The accountability is now on you if you still deny Jesus."

In the Qur'an, God explains what He revealed to Jesus, and He quoted the summary of what Jesus taught. There's a reason God mentions Jesus a lot in the final revelation and it corrects the errors that your people were falsely led to believe.

Bong wrote: "And Muhammad was never a brethren or brothers to Israelites his an Arab you fool🤣😂😂"

The Arab nation under Ishmael (pbuh) are the brethren nation under Isaac (pbuh).

Bong wrote: "How is Jesus same like Moses"

I already explained how using my chart.

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂tell me, Muhammad's prophesy in Quran. If his a true prophet he must pass Deuteronomy 18:20. Otherwise, his just a false prophet and deserve to die like 💩😂😂😂

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂 Moses can speak to YHWH face to face see Exodus 33 11 😂😂😂 Muhammad who saw him talked to allah face to face? A flying donkey? 😂😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "tell me, Muhammad's prophesy in Quran"

The Roman Byzantines just lost a battle with the Persian Sassanids, but the Qur’an made a bold claim stating (30:1-5) "that the Byzantines would make a huge comeback against the Sassanids within 3 to 9 years. Of course, the prophecy did come true despite this. After about 7 years from the Byzantines defeat, they made a huge comeback and started to take back all of the lands they lost (bit.ly/4ah9O0Z)" even though at the time of the Qur'an prediction, the feat seemed impossible.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "If his a true prophet he must pass Deuteronomy 18:20. Otherwise, his just a false prophet and deserve to die like 💩"

You mean the way Paul died? 🤔

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂paul never claimed his a prophet 😂😂😂but Muhammad says he is... You only posted one stuupid prophesy 😂😂😂you think i can just accept it only one your a joke like your stuuupid prophet 😂😂😂😂

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂the Romans defeated when? It's just 💩💩💩 and who is Alif. Lam. Mim? 😂😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "the Romans defeated when?"

620 A.D.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "paul never claimed his a prophet"

Didn't he claim to receive visions from God? Doesn't your "holy book" consist mostly of Paul's letters that you believe are the "divinely-inspired Word of God?"

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂are you crazy defeated by who? 620 AD 😂😂😂When did Muhammad became a prophet? Do you understand what is a real prophet of the bible?

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂 boy there are divine ministry it's not prophesy. Like Paul his a preacher and a teacher too. Others like gift of healing, other like Solomon is gift of wisdom. David had kingship, leadership and humility. There are many more. You need to read the Bible to understand it...

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "defeated by who?"

The Persian Sassanids.

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "When did Muhammad became a prophet?"

When he was 40 yrs old.

Bong wrote: "Do you understand what is a real prophet of the bible?"

Do you understand anything at all? It honestly doesn't seem like it.

Bong wrote: "there are divine ministry it's not prophesy"

You're babbling. Why do you think I would value your opinion of your corrupted book? I don't care what you think about religion and spirituality. You're not a smart person.

Bong Dee - 😂 at what age was Muhammad when he did this prophesy or at what year this prophesy was told? When did it came true?

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "at what age was Muhammad when he did this prophesy"

The prophet was 50 yrs old at the time of that revelation.

Bong wrote: "When did it came true?"

A few years later.

Bong Dee - if Muhammad was 50 that means to say this happened in 620AD. But the Persian defeated the Romans in 613AD. So you mean this is the fulfillment of his prophesy. Do you agree?

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "Do you agree?"

lol Are you trying to finagle the dates I chose to fake prove the historical event didn't actually happen?

Bong Dee - that's why i am checking the timeline if i am not wrong? My estimate maybe wrong do enlighten me...

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "My estimate maybe wrong do enlighten me..."

Remember in the beginning of this bit, when you assumed the prophet Muhammad didn't make any predictions that were revealed by Allah in the Qur'an, and you giggled until you found out you were wrong? And now you find yourself desperately trying to figure out how to fix the dates of the Byzantine–Sasanian War to prove it wrong in your mind somehow?

This is the part that's most interesting to me -- watching your cognitive dissonance eat away at your anti-Islam worldview.

Muhammad Rasheed - Hey, where did all of your giggling emojis go? Hm?

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂i told you already 1 prophesy doesn't make him a true prophet 😂😂😂 my emojis are still there.

Bong Dee - and you didn't give answer to my question. So do you agree that he prophesied it in 620 AD? When Muhammad was about 50 yrs old. Do you agree?

Muhammad Rasheed - He actually made lots of prophecies. That one is most highlighted because it was an actual big deal—literally NO ONE thought the Byzantines could recover from that defeat—and put in the Qur'an itself for everyone to marvel at. Earlier, you didn't know he had made ANY prophecies, so even one prophecy that came true, that secular university historians discuss regularly, is quite significant. Your effort to downplay that significance only demonstrates your confirmed lack of personal integrity.

Muhammad Rasheed - I see the emojis came back right on cue. 😏

Muhammad Rasheed - They seem to lack the same gleeful mirth as before. I wonder why?

Bong Dee - 😂😂 my emojis are always there.

Bong Dee - so answer me. Did Muhammad prophesied that the Persian will defeat the Romans in 620AD, his about 50 yrs old. Do you agree?😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "my emojis are always there"

Always? Here's the exact moment when they disappeared, where you got noticeably uncomfortable at the realization that you are 100% wrong about the prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

Muhammad Rasheed - Even just before that, they dropped down from an average of six to one. lol

Muhammad Rasheed - How does this feel? To find out you were literally wrong about EVERYTHING and actually chose the wrong religion? Huh?

Do you feel the butterflies in your stomach churning around? Tell me.

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂 you can't answer the question because your prophet is a false prophet😂😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - He's still a 'false prophet' even though he went around prophesizing events that came true, huh? Interesting how the Christian mind works, isn't it? Huh. #Fascinating

Bong Dee - 😂😂😂 Persians defeated the Romans in 613AD. So if Muhammad prophesied it in 620AD. That means it's already past. So it means his a false prophet💩💩 😂😂😂

By the time he prophesied the Romans had decisively defeated the Persians in 620AD. So his prophesy is still wrong 😂😂😂😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Bong wrote: "Persians defeated the Romans in 613AD. So if Muhammad prophesied it"

You're confused (again). After the Persians defeat them, the Qur'an predicts that the Byzantines will come back and win. THAT'S the prediction. Pay attention, please.

Obviously, you're so desperately trying to figure out how to save face, it's making you even sloppier than you are normally.

Familial Disapproval versus the Divine Command

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Familial Disapproval versus the Divine Command.'" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 2023 [cartoon pending]. Permanent marker w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

*************************************************

Majid Al Kushi - Why do the Followers of The illiterate Prophet cry when we post their resources?!!!

Babatola Emmanuel Abioye - The truth is that certain truths about Islam and the 'holy prophet' hurt Muslims. They call such truths blasphemy, and have shed a lot of blood for it, and are ready to shed more.

Muhammad Rasheed - Babatola wrote: "The truth is that certain truths about Islam and the 'holy prophet' hurt Muslims"

Like what? 🤔

Muhammad Rasheed - The real truth of the matter is that Christians don't know their own religion as well as they should. The flock is unfortunately content to allow the self-serving clergy to spoonfeed them pre-packaged ideology loosely based upon the bible.

If Christians truly studied to show themselves approved as they were commanded, then they would find themselves reverting to Islam in a smooth logical transition.

Majid Al Kushi - M. Rasheed wrote: "Like what?"

like jumping on Aisha the 9 years old. Like lusting after his daughter in law and divorcing her from his son and taking her for himself

Muhammad Rasheed - Majid wrote: "like jumping on Aisha the 9 years old"

What does the age of marital consent have to do with his prophethood and the religion? It's not even mentioned in the Qur'an. This is one of those items that can quickly become a hypocritical thing for you since it's based purely on subjective cultural norms, so I suggest you tread carefully.

Majid wrote: "Like lusting after his daughter in law and divorcing her from his son and taking her for himself"

You're interpreting the event from the position of an ignorant disbelieving outsider, so how would your opinion matter at all? Zayd was not a blood relation of the Prophet (pbuh) and Allah encouraged the union to enforce His commands about blood ties over friendship ties. Our human traditions treat "step-children" relations as if they are blood, but God said that's not a thing, because it creates unnecessary drama within the inheritance rights.

Majid Al Kushi - 

Behold! Thou didst say to one who had received the grace of Allah and thy favour: "Retain thou (in wedlock) thy wife, and fear Allah." But thou didst hide in thy heart that which Allah was about to make manifest: thou didst fear the people, but it is more fitting that thou shouldst fear Allah. Then when Zaid had dissolved (his marriage) with her, with the necessary (formality), We joined her in marriage to thee: in order that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the Believers in (the matter of) marriage with the wives of their adopted sons, when the latter have dissolved with the necessary (formality) (their marriage) with them. And Allah's command must be fulfilled.

Muhammad Rasheed - That's the one! lol

Majid Al Kushi - why was he hiding ii

Muhammad Rasheed - Majid wrote: "why was he hiding ii[sic]"

Because it was human tradition to treat "step-children" as if they are actual blood ties and the Prophet knew that the people would have an issue with it and it would be a difficult sell. Allah revealed that there was no issue since the friendship tie pretending to be a blood tie is unacceptable in His Eyes, so He used the revelation to make the Divine Position clear on the matter, that's why Allah had His prophet go through with it so we would definitively know what the correct guidance about it was with Allah.

Muhammad Rasheed - Allah actually wants us to STOP calling adopted children "sons & daughters" and instead call them by their actual parents' names. If this is not possible, then call them our brothers & sisters in Faith instead.

People have a problem with this, and uphold human traditionalism over the commands of the One God.

Muhammad Smith - 

What's your #HardTruth ?

Robert Asmar Pelaez - At least she expose the truth. It’s the sneaky hypocrites. That’s the worst but pork is not as bad as people make it to be. Its just Harram for those who know better. so there may be room for conversation with her about it maybe some intervention invention

Muhammad Rasheed - Robert wrote: "but pork is not as bad as people make it to be"

God said don't eat it.

Robert Asmar Pelaez - @Muhammad... God also said make it 1000 excuses for your Muslim family but really the only reason I made the comment is because  it’s a delicate situation when you’re dealing with your mother. And it’s not the port that’s bad as the disobedience to the Lord of all the world, and she may be innocent of that so there’s a reason for patience.

Muhammad Rasheed - Robert wrote: "it’s a delicate situation when you’re dealing with your mother"

God also mentions several times to be kind to parents but DON'T let them pressure you into disobedience to God's commands.

Robert wrote: "And it’s not the port that’s bad"

God said not to eat the flesh of swine. It wasn't designed for human consumption. It sounds suspiciously like you eat it all the time and cooked up justifications for your own disobedience. Is this true?

Robert Asmar Pelaez - God also said don’t fornicate he also said don’t drink wine or bad. Things gonna happen, many ways, but life and death means nothing without the obedience of your Lord  therefore, if you’re not at fault, and someone like your mother gave pork to them self, or to someone else, that’s not the main issue the issue is to get her on the side of the leash not to argue with her about how bad pork is

Muhammad Rasheed - Robert wrote: "God also said don’t fornicate he also said don’t drink wine or bad. Things gonna happen"

The guidance is to repent and do it no more.

Robert wrote: "many ways, but life and death means nothing without the obedience of your Lord"

Agreed. God said don't eat it, so don't eat it.

Robert wrote: "therefore, if you’re not at fault, and someone like your mother gave pork to them self, or to someone else, that’s not the main issue"

The point of Bro. Smith's meme, is that a hostile relative made it known that she would disrespect the tenets of your faith. If you send your Muslim child to that household unsupervised knowing this, you are in the wrong.

Robert wrote: "the issue is to get her on the side of the leash not to argue with her about how bad pork is"

The issue is to guard the members of your household from the unrepentant hellbound.

The Holy Relics: Respect-by-Example versus Worship

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Holy Relics: Respect-by-Example versus Worship.'" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 2023 [cartoon pending]. Permanent marker w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

*************************************************

Majid Al Kushi - Jesus is alive today in heaven. Where is the founder of Islam?

Muhammad Rasheed - What an odd question. It is irrelevant where any of the prophets of the One God reside today. What matters is that the One God is watching us all in preparation for Judgment Day.

Majid Al Kushi - Read Quran 46: 9

Muhammad Rasheed - What does that have to do with my point? Even if Jesus is in heaven and it were true that Muhammad (peace be upon the prophets) is in the grave waiting to go to heaven, why would that be relevant to my own faith walk on earth today?

Majid Al Kushi - Muhammad didn't know what is his destinations or Muslims destinations?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why do you follow him??!!!!!

Muhammad Rasheed - lol I don't understand what all the exclamation marks are for. 46:9 is Allah telling His prophet to tell the people that he is preaching the enduring scripture of the ages and not a brand new religion. He's explaining that he is only preaching what was revealed to him by the One God. Just like the Deut. 18:18 prophecy said, Muhammad (pbuh) was only preaching what was put in his mouth by God and nothing extra. That's what 46:9 confirms.

Will you not then believe? Repent and bow down as a Muslim and save your soul.

Muhammad Rasheed - (46:9) Say: "I am no bringer of new-fangled doctrine among the messengers, nor do I know what will be done with me or with you. I follow but that which is revealed to me by inspiration; I am but a Warner open and clear."

Muhammad Rasheed - (Deuteronomy 18:18) "I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee [Moses], and will put my words in his mouth [i.e., Bismillah]; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him."

Majid Al Kushi - You better follow the Quran, which tells you about a claimed prophecy attributed to Jesus (a prophet will come after me named Ahmed) show it to me please in the Injeel

Muhammad Rasheed - The "Injeel" mentioned by Allah in the Qur'an was the revelation that the Christ Jesus (peace be upon the prophet) preached during his lifetime. This literature does not exist in the modern day (outside of what Allah quotes from Jesus in the Qur'an).

What the people of the book do have is the Christian version of 'hadith' about Jesus. Perhaps you mean to ask me for something else?

Majid Al Kushi - or the other possibility is Muhammad was a false prophet. He didn't know what he was talking about

Muhammad Rasheed - Why would a "false prophet" tell the pagan Meccans to stop worshiping idols and worship the one God of Abraham instead? 🤔That doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

It's far more likely that this false prophet you're looking for was actually Paul of Tarsus, who encouraged people to perform the great sin of worshiping the very human final Hebrew prophet in the line of Isaac (pbuh) alongside the Lord thy God. That's clearly the culprit who deserves the charge.

Majid Al Kushi - He claims revelation, so he had to teach something new to the pagans. But he kept the worship of the black stone

Muhammad Rasheed - Majid wrote: "He claims revelation, so he had to teach something new to the pagans"

Sure, it was new to the pagan Arabs, but it wasn't a new message. It was the return of the pure faith of Abraham himself (peace be upon him).

Majid wrote: "But he kept the worship of the black stone"

You don't seem to know what "worship" means. No one worships the Black Stone. It's regarded with respect as a relic from the smoking gun catalyst of the Great Deluge of Noah (pbuh), but it's not worshiped.

Majid Al Kushi - Muhammad kissed it during Hajj. He said it will come in the day of judgement and testify on behalf of the Muslim who worships it

Muhammad Rasheed - Majid wrote: "Muhammad kissed it during Hajj"

So? Did he pray to it, asking it for favors and mercy? lol You need to look up the definition of "worship," bro.

Majid wrote: "He said it will come in the day of judgement and testify on behalf of the Muslim who worships it"

In the Qur'an, Allah said literally everything will be given the power to speak, bear witness and testify, including our very own individual body parts. Does that mean we worship them, too? 😏

Majid Al Kushi - read your answer and judge if it makes sense

Muhammad Rasheed - English is my mother tongue. How about you run it through Google Translate so you don't remain so confused.

Muhammad Rasheed - There were no doubt pagans from the days of ignorance who really did worship the Black Stone. We can reasonably expect the Stone to bear witness against those fools on the Last Day, sure. No Muslim worships it though, so you don't have an argument here.

What else do you have?

Majid Al Kushi - kissing a stone in the most holy place of Islam hoping it will testify for in the last day is pure paganism

Muhammad Rasheed - Kissing the Sign of Allah is an act of respect for one of the relics, it's not an act of worship. lol Do you worship your parents, wife & kids when you kiss them?

Majid wrote: "hoping it will testify"

I don't "hope" it will testify, I expect it to testify per the Word of the One God who sent the thing to earth to activate the Great Flood's destruction.

Muhammad Rasheed - "Pure paganism" is worshiping the very, very human son of Mary as a divine entity. You may want to knock it off.

Majid Al Kushi - I don't kiss them to forgive my sins. As for kissing Idols as an act of worship here is a reference

‭(I Kings‬ ‭19:18‬ ‭NKJV‬) Yet I have reserved seven thousand in Israel, all whose knees have not bowed to Baal, and every mouth that has not kissed him.”

Muhammad Rasheed - Majid wrote: "I don't kiss them to forgive my sins"

Me neither. I kiss it because my prophet kissed it as a sign of respect towards his Lord's relic. lol

Majid wrote: "and every mouth that has not kissed him"

What does kissing Baal's idols in actual pagan worship have to do with Muslims kissing the Black Stone in non-worshipful respect of the One God's holy relic? You appear to have confused yourself again.

Muhammad Rasheed - For example, the Ark of the Covenant contains the Rod of Aaron (pbuh), the Tablets of the Commandments and other relics of God. We Muslims would kiss all of them (if the Ark wouldn't zap us for the presumption) for the same reason we kiss the Black Stone. These are all Signs of the Supreme Creator and they deserve our respect as proof of our belief. That respect is not worship. lol

There are no people on earth more anti-idolatry than us Muslims. No one recognizes this more than you Christians, since we've been giving you guys flack over your very pagan worship of the final Hebrew prophet for the last 1400 yrs. Trust me, we know the difference between worship versus respect and certainly more than you do.

Muhammad Rasheed - Majid wrote: "you better follow the Quran, which tells you about a claimed prophecy attributed to Jesus (a prophet will come after me named Ahmed) show it to me please in the Injeel"

lol You didn't want to follow up on this? I only asked you to rephrase it since nobody in their right mind actually believes that the collected letters of Paul the False with the anonymously-written four Pauline Gospels are actually the divinely revealed Injeel preached by Jesus. Those are two completely different works.

A Flabby Flex Attempt

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "A Flabby Flex Attempt.'" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 2023 [cartoon pending]. Permanent marker w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

*************************************************

Q: Is it possible that the United States could have abolished slavery in a gradual manner that would have prevented a war?

Chris Bast - Anything's possible, but in this case it would have taken a much longer time. Like, multiple generations long.

Realistically slavery would have eventually faded away no matter what happened. Industrialization makes slavery inevitably unprofitable. But that would have taken so long we might have gone well into the 20th century before slavery finally ended for good.

To accelerate the process, we would have to engineer, essentially, an industrial revolution in the Southern states. Someone would have had to convince the South AND the North that a grand program of economic reform was necessary and practical. That could have, in theory, weaned the South off of slavery. But like I said, it would take a long time. A lot of elections would have to go right for this to work.

Although that doesn't address the cultural problem. Making slavery unprofitable doesn't make blacks and whites equal, socially speaking. You might have ended slavery but you'd probably still have something resembling Jim Crow for a very long time.

The Civil War was unfortunate, but compared to the several generations of work that could have gone wrong at multiple points, I think it was the lesser evil.

Muhammad Rasheed - Chris wrote: “Realistically slavery would have eventually faded away”

Realistically, no one would willingly give up free slave labor. It would never just fade away; people have to be forced to stop doing wrong when they lack the moral fabric to do the right thing.

Chris Bast - M. Rasheed wrote: "Realistically, no one would willingly give up free slave labor."

Nonsense. There's no such thing as “free” labor. Even slaves have to be fed, clothed, and housed. Machines don't. They cost less money and take up less space. And they don't ever revolt.

People will absolutely willingly give up “free” slave labor when the alternative is probably cheaper.

Muhammad Rasheed - Chris wrote: “Nonsense. There's no such thing as ‘free’ labor.”

That’s the formal definition. You’re right though that EVERYTHING costs something as your very misplaced pedantic point.

Chris wrote: “Even slaves have to be fed, clothed, and housed.”

True. So, the pre-Civil War version of U.S. chattel slavery was replaced with the mass incarcerate state, where the U.S. gov paid for the overhead of the convict leasing modern version of slave labor and businesses pay a fee to use that labor force.

Chris Bast - Oh please. A minuscule percent of the labor in this country is done by prisoners.

Knock that racial chip off your shoulder and join us in the real world.

Muhammad Rasheed - Chris wrote: “Oh please. A minuscule percent of the labor in this country is done by prisoners.”

A minuscule percentage of the pre-Civil War populace owned slaves, too, but the nation still ran on the chattel slave economy. You don’t have a point. Checkmate.

Chris wrote: “Knock that racial chip off your shoulder”

I don’t actually have a “racial chip” on my shoulder, since the weaponization of African & Caribbean immigration reveals that America’s “peculiar” systemic racism legacy is actually xenophobe-based discrimination against my American Descendants of Slavery ethnic group and not racial after-all.

Chris wrote: “and join us in the real world.”

Based on the strength of your argument (such as it is), I can’t say I understand what you mean by that. I doubt it means you are a fan of the Tate Bros. lol

Chris Bast - Okay, you realize we can all see who you are replying to, right? You don’t have to keep repeating who you’re quoting like a child.

M. Rasheed wrote: "the nation still ran on the chattel slave economy."

Not even close to true.

M. Rasheed wrote: "I don’t actually have a 'racial chip' on my shoulder"

You’re only lying to yourself.

Muhammad Rasheed - Chris wrote: “You don’t have to keep repeating who you’re quoting like a child.”

This must be a form of the Tone Police Fallacy. lol

Chris wrote: “Not even close to true.”

It’s quite true.

Chris wrote: “You’re only lying to yourself.”

Since you’ve resorted to fallacies and willfully ignorance denials that we both know you have zero evidence for, it’s clear which one of us is actually lying to ourselves with a reddened face. lol

Chris Bast - M. Rasheed wrote: "This must be a form of the Tone Police Fallacy. lol"

That’s…not a fallacy.

M. Rasheed wrote: "It’s quite true."

I know you really want to believe that, but…

M. Rasheed wrote: "Since you’ve resorted to fallacies"

I’m convinced you don’t know what that word means.

Muhammad Rasheed - Chris wrote: “That’s…not a fallacy.”

Geez. Do you know anything at all? Your existence must be pretty sad living in a fact/knowledge/truth void.

Chris wrote: “I know you really want to believe that, but…”

…somehow you believe that no one wanted to use free slave labor in a free slave labor economy. smdh I think you have a ‘being wrong fetish.’ You love it. lol

Chris wrote: “I’m convinced you don’t know what that word means.”

hahahahaha At this point, you should delete your account.

Chris Bast - M. Rasheed wrote: "Do you know anything at all?"

Do you? Just because some idiot wrote it up on a blog and it got thrown into the google algorithm doesn’t make it a formal (or informal) fallacy.

Besides, you are not in a position to complain about fallacies since your every comment is full of them. Indeed, you are using that very “fallacy” (which is not really a fallacy) right now.

M. Rasheed wrote: "smdh I think you have a ‘being wrong fetish.’ You love it. lol"

Ad hominem fallacy.

M. Rasheed wrote: "hahahahaha At this point, you should delete your account."

Appeal to ridicule fallacy.

I guess you either really don’t know what fallacies are, or you really really like them.

Muhammad Rasheed - Chris wrote: “Do you?”

I certainly know more than you do on the topic of U.S. race relations. You appear to solely rely upon a foundation of white supremacist emotionalism as your evidence sources.

Chris wrote: “Just because some idiot wrote it up on a blog and it got thrown into the google algorithm doesn’t make it a formal (or informal) fallacy.”

True. Fortunately for our purposely, this blog is actually the structured explanation of fallacies using the book Logically Fallacious by Dr. Bo Bennett as the source text. So, we don’t need to fear being taken by “some idiot” who doesn’t know what he is talking about, as the title is itself well-sourced and peer-reviewed in the proper fashion.

Chris wrote: “Besides, you are not in a position to complain about fallacies”

“Complain” isn’t the appropriate term here. “Amused” would be more accurate, since I’m watching you flip around like a beached fish desperately trying to save face. lol

Chris wrote: “(which is not really a fallacy)”

To be clear, “tone policing” is indeed an official logical fallacy, and described as such within every definition from any source you’d care to use, since you hate blogs published by the “idiot” at the top of my casual Internet search for the term.

Anyway, I’m not guilty of tone policing you at all and have managed to skillfully address your actual (weak) message content. I challenge you to demonstrate HOW I’m guilty of the charge, if ye are truthful. ;)

Chris wrote: “Ad hominem fallacy.”

For example, in order to successfully prove that I’m guilty of the ad hominem, you’d have to show where I purposely ignored the content of your claim to instead attack you as a person. At no point have I done this, and in fact, I instead fully addressed your content point-by-point, using my signature style that you attacked with your tone policing faux-complaint. After I made my counter-point, and it was clear you had nothing to offer to defend your position, then I was free to tease you all I liked. Were I to have committed the ad hominem fallacy, I would have attacked your person INSTEAD of addressing your point, while pretending I addressed your point.

You see, you’ll need to first take the time to understand what the fallacies actually are, and know what they mean, before you are able to use them to call out your opponent’s trip ups. Your argument level is not that advanced, I’m afraid. Did you somehow believe it was? Based on what exactly? I’ll admit bafflement at your misplaced confidence based on what you’ve demonstrated thus far.

Chris wrote: “Appeal to ridicule fallacy.”

Again, the fallacy claim is only true if the opponent ridicules you instead of addressing your content. I did nothing of the sort. All of my ridicule came after you proved incapable of defending your position and were thoroughly checkmated and thus, butthurted, as we see demonstrated here in your enthusiastic fish-flopping exercise.

Smearing Your Ethnic Crazy-Town on a Whole Race

 

Become an M. Rasheed Patreon Subscriber!

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Smearing Your Ethnic Crazy-Town on a Whole Race." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 02 Oct 2023.  Water Soluble Marker w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

Notes While Observing #20: Cosplay as a Social Engineering Tool

 

Elijah Muhammad mimicking Jiddu Krishnamurti (top)
and Shahid Bolsen mimicking Malcolm X 

A few days ago, I saw a clip of this Shahid Bolsen character and my first impression was that someone told AI to mimic Malcolm X using a white dude's image. Everybody has spent sometime being fascinated with Bro. Malcolm — I'm certainly no exception — so, of course I would recognize an effort to deliberately mimic how he came across in his old 1960s television appearances. I went to this Bolsen dude's YouTube channel to investigate, to see if his account really was set up as an AI platform. It wasn't, but you can see, while scrolling through his video backlist thumbnails, the exact moment when the creative decision was made to begin deliberately mimicking Malcolm X in the aesthetic.

I felt an instant flash of anger, thinking at first this was yet another "Wallace Fard" agent trying to misdirect my people into some more bullsh*t. Did we come full circle? At first, real Islamic missionaries were prevented from converting the abused and dejected jim crow era American Descendant of Slavery (ADOS) ethnic group, and were instead replaced by a succession of grifters pretending to be exotic ideological gurus. That's why Elijah Muhammad's handlers had him mimicking Krishnamurti's accent and going on about the "Asiatic Black man" bit. So, is this Malcolm X impression a white dude's mimicry designed to make him a "guru" from the other direction?

According to Bolsen's channel description, the message is supposed to promote the interests of Muslim majority countries, he just decided to exploit a popular ADOS figure to do it. Unless, like Marcus Garvey, his intention is to attract a bunch of Muslim ADOS followers that he can exploit for his own foreign goals? To successfully pull that off, in addition to fabricating a familiar Malcolm X identity to attract the target group, he would have to build upon a generation of anti-USA/Western rhetoric as provided by the pan-africanists. So, in order to successfully build an ADOS army, Bolsen, like Garvey, would have to convince us that our own interests in our own country weren't worth fighting for, which is 100% how pan-africanists talk.

Interestingly, according to another video of his, Bolsen appears to believe that the racial issues that Malcolm X fought against were fictions invented by Western liberals even as he performs his cosplay of an anti-racism, civil rights leader. How offensive is that? Especially considering he readily admits that Malcolm was not only an influence upon him, but also led Bolsen to eventually accept Al-Islam. Noble enough, but why does he—and many other foreigners besides—think that it's okay to exploit our ADOS historical figure while joining white supremacy in downplaying/dismissing the ADOS freedom struggle? How come you can't use your own cultural heroes? In that, it's similar to whites fabricating a fictional 'white' version of Malcolm X's story to give white youth a socially engineered motivation, instead of using whoever their cultural figures are.

Spike Lee's Malcolm X film was studied to
make the plastic American History X,
because whites don't want to use
their own culture's figures for stuff.

I also wonder, if he is indeed trying to attract ADOS with this performance, if it's similar to white entrepreneurs (like DJ Vlad) who will often court the interest of ADOS to give their product a numbers boost to enable them to leverage into bigger investments later.

A sampling from hundreds of
white-owned, fake "black"
platforms infesting social media

See Also:

Notes While Observing #19: Return of the Master Race

Notes While Observing #18: Quantum Thought...?

Notes While Observing #17: How Systemic Racism Works

Notes While Observing #16: The Exclusive White Male Homosexual Club

Notes While Observing #15: Playing the Coon Card

Notes While Observing #14: The Toxicity of Unsolicited "Advice"

Notes While Observing #13: Breaking the Chains of Plunder

Notes While Observing #12: The Sloppiest Cover-Up of All

Notes While Observing #11: Driving the Narrative of 'Whiteness'

Notes While Observing #10: The White Establishment's Plan for Profiting From Black Reparations

Notes While Observing #9: The Descendants of Yakub

Notes While Observing #8: The 1972 Gary Convention

Notes While Observing #7: Strategies of the Discrimination Olympics

Notes While Observing #6: The GOP's International War on Black America

Notes While Observing #5: The Case of the Old Switcheroo

Notes While Observing #4: Risk Responses of the Racial Contract Beneficiary

Notes While Observing #3: Pig Blood, Clinton vs Alton, & Black Twitter

Notes While Observing #2: The Crack in the Musical Bedrock

Notes While Observing #1: Stephen King (Carrie) & Barbra Streisand (Yentl Mendel)

________________________________
MEDIUM: Scanned pen & ink cartoon drawing w/Adobe Photoshop color.

SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!

Rich Watson - Review of Monsters 101, Book One

 

April 6, 2008
Monsters 101, Book One: From Bully to Monster
M. Rasheed, story and art
Second Sight Graphix

Review by Rich Watson

A grade school bully gets recruited by a clan of monsters to lure kids to them for food, but one girl who sees the potential for good inside the bully makes him question his self-worth. This was a submission in this year’s Glyph Comics Awards (2008) that didn’t make the final cut, a reprint of a collection originally published in 2004. The creator, M. Rasheed, is a regular at the BlackSuperhero.com forums. It looks like it was originally done in installments, either pamphlets or maybe online. It’s 150 pages, so you’re getting a good amount of story here.

Monsters 101 is hella violent. Now my generation grew up with Tom & Jerry and Road Runner reruns on Saturday mornings; however, we also had GI Joe, where elite American soldiers and international terrorists constantly took shots at each other and never got hurt; and sanitized Japanese imports like Battle of the Planets (AKA Gatchaman) that didn’t have anywhere near the level of violence as their original incarnations. Generally, I believe kids can handle cartoon violence, especially when the victim is someone who deserves it (Elmer Fudd, Sylvester, Wile E. Coyote, etc.). That’s not the case here. In this book, horrible things happen to kids who don’t deserve it, and we get to see it on-panel. Now, some of it is the kind of violence that defines characters in important ways, like the pivotal scene between Pugg and Katina about two-thirds of the way in. It’s shocking, but at the same time it’s necessary to see. (It’s also difficult to talk about without giving away spoilers.)

I question, however, whether we need to see an innocent kid get ripped apart by two hungry monsters who proceed to eat him. From the get-go, we know these monsters want to eat little children. Does it serve the story better to actually see that happen on-panel, or is it better to imply the act – say, have the monsters drag the kid off-panel and cut to reaction shots of Pugg and Katina as they see the deed done? Bad things do happen to good people in kiddie stories sometimes (Bambi’s mom, Simba’s dad, etc.), but I believe creators of all-ages stories have a responsibility to remember their audience when they craft scenes like this, even when it involves fantastic, unreal elements like monsters. And if I were a parent and I saw this scene, where we see the kid’s blood and intestines spill out all over the place (NO JOKE), no way am I letting my kid read this book.

In addition to the violence, the language in Monsters 101 is inappropriate. More than a few “damns” and “hells,” some “bastards,” at least one “son of a b*tch,” and “frig/frag/frik” is a little too close to the f-word for my tastes (Pugg says “motherfragger” at least once). This is a particular shame because there’s a decent, if familiar, beauty-and-the-beast-style redemption tale underneath the profanity, although it ends with the death of a character I didn’t want to see die – especially since this book is the first in a series.

The design of Pugg and the way Rasheed depicts him throughout the story is wonderful. (Pugg reminded me most of a kiddie version of Sal Buscema’s Hulk! Seriously!) From the way he lumbers through the school halls, to the way he grimaces at schoolteachers and scowls at opponents, and especially to his protective and genuinely affectionate manner towards Katina, Pugg visually comes across as a fully formed, three-dimensional character, and I give the creator props for that. One can quite easily determine his state of mind from the pictures alone. The design of the three monsters falls somewhere between Maurice Sendak’s Wild Things and Pixar’s Mike and Sully – goofy and slightly eerie without being really scary. I think Rasheed overdoes it on the shadows, though. In places it looks like nothing more than a scribble of the brush to indicate light and dark without making any sense, and it doesn’t look professional. And why isn’t Katina on the cover, especially given her pivotal and proactive role in the third act?

I wish I could recommend this book, but the liberal use of profanity, couple with certain scenes of gratuitous violence (did I mention Pugg’s six-page, no holds barred fight scene that ends with Pugg bashing his opponent’s head in with a rock?), plus several misspellings in the second half, leads me to conclude that this isn’t the best book for kids to read. C

[ORIGINAL SITE; NOW DEFUNCT] http://www.popcultureshock.com/the-sunday-review-monsters-101/43594/

Son of Batey

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Son of Batey.'" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 2023 [cartoon pending]. Permanent marker w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

*************************************************

Q: Why are African-Americans treated differently in the US?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior - You assume in the question that black americans are treated differently. They are treated like everyone, according to the content of their character. It's no one's fault if they wish to follow their gangsta lifestyle, get arrested, then play the victim. We all know who commits the highest amount of violent crime and racist hate crimes. Even devil Farrakhan knows that,’ cause he promotes and incites it.

Muhammad Rasheed - Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You assume in the question that black americans are treated differently.”

Your profile name says you are a “truth warrior,” yet the well-documented truths of Black Americans being discriminated against and economically excluded from society seems to have missed you. The obvious question is why did you respond to this question when you possessed such a clear knowledge deficit and were not qualified to speak on it at all?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “They are treated like everyone, according to the content of their character.”

Not so. The dominant political identity group routinely economically discriminates against Black Americans, continuing the tradition started at the beginning of the slave era when the enslaved Africans were permanently, and unfairly delegated to a hereditary chattel bondsman class by law, continuing the discrimination through the jim crow period up to now in the era of mass incarceration. The “content of their character” line ironically references a speech by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., whose brutal assassination is what signaled the end of the Civil Rights Movement, not any enlightenment by the white populace. In fact, their behavior only got worse, even on the liberal side.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “It's no one's fault if they wish to follow their gangsta lifestyle, get arrested, then play the victim.”

The so-called “gangsta lifestyle” was established by the CIA when, on the orders of president Ronald Reagan, pumped crack into the Black American community and radicalized the youth into hyper-violent trafficking gangs in order to siphon out the little bit of manufacturing wealth to fund the Contras war. Blaming the artificially-impoverished victims for the effects of a multi-billion dollar U.S. government long-con is evil and on-brand for your group.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “We all know who commits the highest amount of violent crime and racist hate crimes.”

Do we? I know I do (hint: racketeering corrupt white businessmen, white politicians & their blue collar lackeys), but your true knowledge is covered up by your partisan-flavored, propagandist nonsense.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Even devil Farrakhan knows that,’ cause he promotes and incites it.”

Despite his personal flaws, and the treacherous flaws of his organization, Farrakhan’s efforts to call out the evils of white supremacy neither promotes nor incites the crime our own complicit US gov established.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior - You also assume that it’s okay to follow the example of a sexually perverted pedophile ( muhammed the prophet of islam, or the drug dealer Fard Muhammed) tyrant whose message continues to promote murder and rape of non- muslims. Your name is his name. Your ghetto mentality is why you addressed me with your lies. Suddenly the cia has domination of the actions of individual people? That has got to be the most low iq bs I have heard in years. ( how much crack did you smoke before professing pisslam?) How did you get to that level of stupid? Sounds like your mind perversion is condoned by a race baiting degenerate named devil Farrakhan. Just send your islamic white killing spaceships (1500 of them plus a mothership🤣🤣)to come and get me. My god, you people are the propietors of a sadistic joke. When will people wake up? You can match me on any level because I can tear you to pieces in a debate. I know who you are and how you think. I also can debunk your crack pipe fairy tales. I come from the school of Anton Batey, a decent black person that helped debunk your racist ghetto cult. With me you have no chance of winning in a debate. Zero!!!

Muhammad Rasheed - Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You also assume that it’s okay to follow the example of a sexually perverted pedophile ( muhammed the prophet of islam”

You obviously don’t know anything at all about the religion of Al-Islam. You used the term “debate” at the end of your juvenile, profane tirade, which is comical. Is this how you flex your “truth & common sense” powers? I find both your warrior’s heart and your intellect lacking.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “or the drug dealer Fard Muhammed)”

I’m not in the NOI. Never have been.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “tyrant”

Where’s your evidence that the prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was a “tyrant?” Do you even know what a tyrant is?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “whose message continues to promote murder and rape of non- muslims.”

lol In what way does Islam promote that exactly? Let’s see your evidence. Throw down your rod.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Your name is his name.”

Proudly.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Your ghetto mentality”

lol And just where did I exhibit a ghetto mentality? Copy/paste it so we can analyze your claim together.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “is why you addressed me with your lies.”

Again, at the end of your tirade above, you curiously used the word “debate.” Be so kind as to provide your evidence that objectively proves that the historical events I referenced were “lies,” if you please.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Suddenly the cia has domination of the actions of individual people?”

This is a strawman effigy fallacy. The Reagan administration directed the CIA to attack and economically oppress the entire group—not just the individual—the same way they radicalized youth in foreign lands to destabilize sovereign nations on behalf of megacorporate. That they did this to U.S. citizens is a disgrace and clear treason, but people like you dismiss the evil because you are an anti-Black American racist. Shame on you. You didn’t even ask for my proof, you just defaulted to childish name-calling and calling the claims “lies” without any kind of intelligent query. Please note that neither ‘truth’ nor ‘common sense’ work like that, “warrior.”

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “That has got to be the most low iq bs I have heard in years.”

Should I be surprised that you are unaware that the so-called intelligence quotient was debunked and proven fraudulent by scientists? I’m not.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “( how much crack did you smoke before professing pisslam?) How did you get to that level of stupid?”

So far, you haven’t typed anything that suggests you are intelligent on any level. I have noted that you are racist, xenophobic, willfully ignorant, uncouth and profane. This is demonstrably the sum total of your claimed “truth and common sense.” I haven’t given up on you though. You may just be having a bad day. I’ll give you a chance to bring your A-Game.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Sounds like your mind perversion”

Apparently, you believe my mind is perverted for no other reason than because I don’t blindly parrot biased, partisan-flavored rhetoric like you. Is that supposed to mean something to me? You’ll need to present verifiable facts to fill your shallow and delicate “truth” title you wear—which appears to be made of tissue paper. lol

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “is condoned by a race baiting degenerate named devil Farrakhan.”

I’m not in the NOI and I’m not a fan, but if you’re suggesting that Farrakhan is somehow a lower human being than any random money-worshiping, politically corrupt, filthy celebrity name on your side of the ideological aisle, then you must be mentally ill. You just don’t like the idea of ANYONE sticking up for the Black American former slave class ethnic group, whom you despise.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Just send your islamic white killing spaceships (1500 of them plus a mothership🤣🤣)to come and get me. My god, you people are the propietors of a sadistic joke. When will people wake up?”

None of this means anything to me. I’m an orthodox Muslim who follows the Qur’an and the way of the prophet (pbuh). That means I claim no divergent sects of any kind.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You can match me on any level because I can tear you to pieces in a debate.”

Can or can’t? I’ve frankly seen nothing yet to suggest you even know what a debate actually is. I’ll give you the chance to prove yourself though. En garde.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “I know who you are and how you think.”

lol Clearly not. But you’ll find out soon enough if you can at least manage to not be a coward.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “I also can debunk your crack pipe fairy tales.”

No, you can’t. So far, you’ve only blindly vomited political talking points that aren’t backed by anything of substance.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “I come from the school of Anton Batey, a decent black person that helped debunk your racist ghetto cult.”

Really? You mean this clown here whom I destroyed in a 2017 debate, shamed him into deleting his “Proof the Fard/Einstein Debate is Fake” video on YouTube and posted his trouncing up on my trophy wall:

[DEBATE] W.D. Fard Muhammad vs Albert Einstein | Followed by M. Rasheed vs Anton Batey

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “With me you have no chance of winning in a debate. Zero!!!”

Well, if you’re supposed to be Batey’s protégé or whatever, be so kind as to read through our battle and pick up where your slain mentor left off…

…if you’re able. ;)

Truth And Common Sense Warrior - You’re blatant ignorance assumes too much. The racist ghetto cult you are in is bashing what little brain you have left. Get your real name back, not the one of a goat screwing pedophile. You exposed yourself big time when you called yourself Muhammed Rasheed. I knew you were NOI right away. You people ignorant beyond all logic, and hideously evil to boot. You don’t know the freedom you could have by dumping that worthless cult. As if islam weren’t bad enough, you subscribe to a racist ghetto cult which is a second generation cult of the original cult. All of it is BULLSHIT. I lived in the middle east for 3 years. Had you taken a little time to do your homework instead of becoming a ghetto forged bigot of a racist cult, perhaps you wouldn’t have had waste yoyr life in the street selling the “final call”. What a fucking joke that is. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Gotta be a true mindless twit to fall for that bullshit. Next thing you’re going to tell me that a black scientist created the moon by placing high explosives in the earth 66 trillion years ago. Dude, you are a joke by choice. You choose to surround yourself with narccisstic numbskulls who don’t know anything but how to mentally masturbate yourself into the most idiotic cult in America. Come back with something more orginal, not that programmed sissified bs they feed you in that phony ass mosque. What is your real name?

Muhammad Rasheed - Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You’re blatant ignorance assumes too much.”

I’m not ignorant on this topic at all. I did notice that you didn’t counter any of my points. You just posted another emotional, profane tantrum. Is this all you have?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “The racist ghetto cult you are in is bashing what little brain you have left.”

I’m unconvinced you know what ‘racist,’ ‘ghetto,’ or ‘cult’ mean. I’m starting to suspect you’re just typing all the words you’ve heard before…

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Get your real name back, not the one of a goat screwing pedophile.”

You realize you’re insulting the messenger of the One God of Abraham, right? You also realize that hell is eternal torment, right?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You exposed yourself big time when you called yourself Muhammed Rasheed.”

lol Meanwhile, I’ve never called myself that. I’m amused that you can’t spell even when you’re looking directly at the word, but you had the nerve to call me “low iq.” smh

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “I knew you were NOI right away.”

Meanwhile, I’ve never been in the NOI. I’m an orthodox Muslim. I guess we can add poor reading comprehension to your list of offenses.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You people ignorant beyond all logic, and hideously evil to boot.”

You think the NOI are “evil?” In what way?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You don’t know the freedom you could have by dumping that worthless cult.”

You’re a white man in Catalonia who is completely ignorant about U.S. race relations saying this to me. How can you lecture someone when you don’t know anything? You know who else does this bit outside of you white supremacists? Four year olds. When they do it, they’re just mimicking the cadence of adults. When you do it, you think I’m supposed to just believe your empty, hateful rhetoric for no other reason than because an ignorant, hateful white person is saying it.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “As if islam weren’t bad enough”

“Bad” in what way?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “you subscribe to a racist ghetto cult which is a second generation cult of the original cult. All of it is BULLSHIT.”

I’m not in the NOI. lol

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “I lived in the middle east for 3 years.”

So? Just because you stole money from the USG by being a lazy d*ck on a defense contract somewhere doesn’t mean you bothered to learn anything about Islam — which you could’ve done back home on the Internet at anytime. Plus, there’s a 100% chance that all you did was traffick booze from the U.S. Embassy (or Spanish embassy?) and rent Filipina & Ethiopian prostitutes, like every other white guy contracting in the Middle East. How does that make you an expert on Islam again? I’m confident it doesn’t. lol Y’all just say anything.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Had you taken a little time to do your homework”

Anytime you wanna start the debate and demonstrate you’re an expert on the subject — waitin’ on you, bud. Are you going to yap or fight? Maybe you’re stalling while you wait for Anton to show up and save you. lol

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “instead of becoming a ghetto forged bigot of a racist cult , perhaps you wouldn’t have had waste yoyr life in the street selling the ‘final call.’”

I’m not in the NOI. Never have been.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “What a fucking joke that is. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Gotta be a true mindless twit to fall for that bullshit. Next thing you’re going to tell me that a black scientist created the moon by placing high explosives in the earth 66 trillion years ago. Dude, you are a joke by choice. You choose to surround yourself with narccisstic numbskulls who don’t know anything but how to mentally masturbate yourself into the most idiotic cult in America.”

I guess this counts as a particularly elaborate version of the strawman effigy logical fallacy, performed so you can pretend to be half-illiterate & crazy so you don’t have to actually accept this duel challenge and epically lose face like Batey did.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Come back with something more orginal”

How about re-read my last post and respond to it appropriately instead of being a coward? Let’s try that.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior - Cowards hide behind vendictive lies. You answer like a well brain washed uncle Tom on the plantation. I know what you believe and how to debunk it. Your character defect of envy couoled with toxic pride left you vulnerable to the noi satanic ghetto cult. YOU’RE IN A RACIST GHETTO CULT!! You Ball lick9ng Murderers need to grow up and man up. You probably have never traveled past the margin of your shithole ghetto except to spread your racist venom. Going to the “haj” is the exact opposite of traveling. You polarize your sick mind with your pussified blanky. Your co-dependence level is so profound that you will never know true freedom. You allow cultic scumbags to define your destiny, all because of your racist hate for whites. Isn’t it time for you to grow a pair and become a real man in the real world. Why must you hide behind that pussy cult?

Muhammad Rasheed - Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Cowards hide behind vendictive lies.”

How do you know my points are lies? What metric are you using to determine this?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You answer like a well brain washed uncle Tom on the plantation.”

lol Am I? I’m merely asking you to prove your assertions, something that a skilled debater would have zero problem providing. You appear to be challenged in this regard. I wonder why?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “I know what you believe”

You appear to be confused as to whether I’m an orthodox Muslim or a member of the NOI, despite me doing you a favor and definitively answering the question for you a couple of times at least. Naturally, I consider this performance a stall tactic designed to hide your transparent bluffing and ignorance.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “and how to debunk it.”

Will we be getting to that part anytime soon, or will you continue your shallow & profane yapping about it? My patience isn’t inexhaustible.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Your character defect of envy”

??? What am I supposed to be envious of? The jackassery of your unrepentant hellbound state? Why would I be envious of that?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “couoled with toxic pride”

You don’t think your identity group isn’t exactly as prideful as you’re projecting at me? Yours is worse since it’s based on a degenerate, monopolizing, racketeering organized crime culture.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “left you vulnerable to the noi satanic ghetto cult.”

I’m not in the NOI it turns out.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “YOU’RE IN A RACIST GHETTO CULT!!”

News to me. When did this occur?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You Ball lick9ng Murderers need to grow up and man up.”

This will be difficult for me considering my membership in this “cult” you’re talking about is fictional, as it’s only in your head. At this point, I need to ask you to confine your accusations to reality so we may both contribute to the discussion. lol

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You probably have never traveled past the margin of your shithole ghetto except to spread your racist venom.”

Even if I didn’t, what difference would it make? I’m still smarter than you, I still beat up your mentor in our debate and shamed him into deleting his YouTube channel, and I recognize you probably still have traces of the venereal diseases you picked up from your unhealthy fascination with Filipina & Ethiopian prostitutes when you were contracting in the Middle East. #ExpereinceIsTheFoolsTeacher

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Going to the ‘haj’ is the exact opposite of traveling.”

I literally have to “travel” in order to get from Point-A to Mecca. That’s actually real, not a metaphor or code word for anything. Are you making up your own definition of “traveling” for the sake of your weird non-point? Why would I be obligated to take that foolishness seriously?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You polarize your sick mind with your pussified blanky.”

English, please. I’m unfamiliar with the Catalonian colloquial.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Your co-dependence level is so profound that you will never know true freedom.”

The freedom of being a buffoon completely devoid of knowledge and truth of any kind such as you display? You’ll have to walk that road without me, I’m afraid. lol

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You allow cultic scumbags to define your destiny”

I’m pretty sure you proudly name-dropped Anton Batey—who’s himself a member of the very cultic Mises Institute—as your mentor. Did you forget already? Our thread isn’t even that long…

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “all because of your racist hate for whites.”

I don’t hate anyone. I only reasonably hate evil actions inflicted upon my group and that certainly doesn’t make me a racist.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Isn’t it time for you to grow a pair and become a real man in the real world.”

I honestly don’t have a clue what this is supposed to be code for when you say it.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Why must you hide behind that pussy cult?”

What cult?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior - The nation of islam is a racist ghetto cult full of black nazis. I know things about you black devils and your sick cult. I know about tge zebra murders and how you phony ass muslims incite violence against whites. I know how and why you think what you think. You’re a black supremacist with the superiority of a toad on a freeway.

Your fairy tales are at the level of sesame street. Debunkable on every turn except when dealing with ignorant morons such as yourself. You can’t expect me to believe you’re not an ignoramus when believing “N” Farrakhan and his spaceship fairy tales. You don’t believe that childish bullshit do you?

From here we begin the unraveling of your ghetto mind. Just answer “yes or “no”.

Do you believe the nation of islam has 1500 mini planes and a mother ship as their main base?

Please answer just so we can get a good laugh at your expense.

Muhammad Rasheed - Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “The nation of islam is a racist ghetto cult full of black nazis.”

At this point, it’s clear that you aren’t even reading my comments. I’m starting to suspect that you don’t know how to read—maybe you’re just talking into an AI app and copy/pasting what it transcribes as your ‘responses.’ That’s really the only thing that explains your behavior. What was the point of dragging Batey into your delusions? Was he your weed man?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “I know things about you black devils and your sick cult.”

There is not a single “sick black cult” in existence that is worse than what your people have done in the world, and for the love of money no less. smh

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “I know about tge zebra murders”

What does that have to do with me?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “and how you phony ass muslims”

I’m a real and practicing Muslim, thanks.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “incite violence against whites.”

Even if they did, you objectively deserved it. A heavy hand is the only thing your group listens to, that and hitting you in your precious, precious stolen wealth hoards.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “I know how and why you think what you think.”

Meanwhile, you’re too cowardly to even read my comments and honestly respond to them. You possess a chronic case of strawman-itis.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You’re a black supremacist with the superiority of a toad on a freeway.”

A “black supremacist” is nothing more than an agent for white supremacy, whose job is to direct energy away from the real Black American political advocacy & liberation movements and confuse the people.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Your fairy tales are at the level of sesame street.”

Sesame Street is a children’s educational program, not a “fairy tale.” Use a more appropriate simile, please. Thanks.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Debunkable on every turn except when dealing with ignorant morons such as yourself.”

Are you saying you can perform true debate with anyone except for me? Is that why you are being a ducking coward in this thread? An interesting public admission, assuming you aren’t simultaneously high on edibles or alcohol or whatever.

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “You can’t expect me to believe you’re not an ignoramus when believing ‘N’ Farrakhan and his spaceship fairy tales. You don’t believe that childish bullshit do you?”

I’m not a member of the NOI nor have I ever been. What does the “N” mean?

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “From here we begin the unraveling of your ghetto mind. Just answer ‘yes’ or ‘no.’”

Is it possible that you really believe you’ve been performing at a high-level throughout this whole thread? Dude, you ARE high. wtf

Truth And Common Sense Warrior wrote: “Do you believe the nation of islam has 1500 mini planes and a mother ship as their main base?”

I’m not a member of the Nation of Islam (NOI) nor have I ever been.

See Also: [DEBATE] W.D. Fard Muhammad vs Albert Einstein | Followed by M. Rasheed vs Anton Batey