Wednesday, July 2, 2025

The Worst of Humanity Expresses Its Stubborn Disbelief in the One God Who Made Them

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Worst of Humanity Expresses Its Stubborn Disbelief in the One God Who Made Them" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.


CLICK & SUBSCRIBE  below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:


M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

**************************

Freeman Grey - [MEME] Somebody tell God to cut the oven off... we fallin off the bone

There is no God or Gods.  No holy men either, but this is a funny meme regardless 😆

Muhammad Rasheed - Freeman wrote: "There is no God"

Of course there it. The material universe can't spring from nothing.

Freeman wrote: "or Gods."

There is only One God.

Freeman wrote: "No holy men either"

The Age of the Prophets is over. Only the message remains.

Freeman Grey - Muhammad, we will just agree to disagree big brother. I will walk my path of truth and you will walk yours. Our mutual interest in black indie superheroes still remains.

Muhammad Rasheed - Freeman wrote: "we will just agree to disagree big brother"

You agree to avoid the deep discussions because they are too hard for you. This is not a noble position. By the way, why call me "big brother" when it turns out you're just some resentful African immigrant who hates my ethnic group? You're certainly no brother of mine.

Freeman wrote: "I will walk my path of truth"

You don't walk a path of truth, you walk a path of shallow, juvenile rebellion against tradition without understanding to follow your lusts.

Muhammad Rasheed - Freeman wrote: "I will walk my path of truth"

In an earlier thread, you claimed to "know a lot about science." Tell me, is it scientifically feasible for matter/energy to spring forth from a literal, mathematical NOTHING?

Freeman Grey - your smug self righteous arrogance is seeping out again. A noble position to avoid your pathetic rhetoric with no historical or scientific data is ideal when I have bigger ideas and battles to pick. You aren't really worthy to debate matters you don't excel in. Matter and energy has always been. It expands and contracts and permeates different forms constantly as the multiverse moves. You are attempting to say an invisible man in the sky and his prophet created things with angels. Absolutely no proof of that. Is current science absolutely fail proof? No, but it grows and evolves unlike your backwards archaic Islamic religion. I want you to beat Neil DeGrasse Tyson and beat him in every debate, then crawl back to me to discuss when you have learned man named after a false prophet.

Freeman Grey - @Richard... handle my light work at your leisure 😆

Richard Diamond - @Freeman... I. Has. Time.

Richard Diamond - @Muhammad... why do you feel obligated to : Muhammad wrote: ? Does this make you feel you have DONE something? Are you so fucking mentally slow .... scientifically retarded ( not the bully definition ... actually fucking retarded ) that tagging the person who literally said it , gives YOUR response any weight. When a stupid person is called out and they have no witty retort, they REPEAT WHAT WAS SAID ,so their smooth little brain can formulate some bullshit. Also since you hate vulgarity: pussy shit asshole smegma dookie

Gustavo Vazquez - @Muhammad... I love when people spew belief as fact...

Muhammad Rasheed - @Gustavo... Why tell me about it? Are you touching yourself?

Muhammad Rasheed - Freeman wrote: "your smug self righteous arrogance is seeping out again."

Drink up.

Freeman wrote: "A noble position to avoid your pathetic rhetoric with no historical or scientific data"

My side has all of the historical and scientific data while yours only has the proud belief in nothing, remember?

Freeman wrote: "is ideal when I have bigger ideas and battles to pick"

That's what running like a coward sounds like. Obviously, you're still shell shocked from our Herotalk era.

Freeman wrote: "You aren't really worthy to debate matters you don't excel in."

More running.

Freeman wrote: "Matter and energy has always been."

That unsupported hypothesis was destroyed when the cosmic microwave radiation was discovered which led to Big Bang Theory.

Freeman wrote: "It expands and contracts and permeates different forms constantly as the multiverse moves."

There is zero evidence for the multiverse, or for the idea that matter/energy always existed. You're expressing a belief system faith article.

Freeman wrote: "You are attempting to say an invisible man in the sky"

God is not "a man." God is God. The most Unique Being in existence. Kurt Gödel's mathematical proof describes an Immaterial, Necessary, All-Powerful and All-Knowing Being is needed to bring forth and maintain a material universe.

Freeman wrote: "and his prophet created things with angels."

No one claimed the prophet created anything. His job was to preach the message and instruct the people. I've noticed that atheists routinely make such errors as evidence of both their willful ignorance and stupidity about the material they reject is based purely on a lazy disinterest.

Freeman wrote: "Absolutely no proof of that."

There absolutely is a mountain of circumstantial evidence for the existence of God, you just blindly dismiss it as one of the tenets of the atheist belief system. You believe in nothing, therefore, nothing exists if you refuse to acknowledge it. Like a toddler who thinks you can't see him because his eyes are closed.

Freeman wrote: "Is current science absolutely fail proof? No, but it grows and evolves"

What does any of that have to do with you when you reject the most well-supported findings of current science to hold onto failed hypotheses?

Freeman wrote: "unlike your backwards archaic Islamic religion."

What makes Islam backward and archaic, please?

Freeman wrote: "I want you to beat Neil DeGrasse Tyson"

I want you to answer all of the questions asked on you in this thread to the best of your knowledge & ability with no ducking.

Freeman wrote: "then crawl back to me"

I asked you if it was scientifically feasible for matter/energy to spring forth from nothing, and you responded by expressing your blind faith in a failed hypothesis.

Freeman wrote: "man named after a false prophet."

Again, I was named after my father, but atheists can't process new information and prefer to blindly believe the nonsense they invent instead. Which one of Muhammad's prophecies was proven false that he would earn the title "false prophet" you label him with such confidence?

Muhammad Rasheed - Richard wrote: "why do you feel obligated to : Muhammad wrote: ?"

Here: Artifacts of the Black Superheroes | My Posting Style

Muhammad Rasheed - Richard wrote: "Also since you hate vulgarity: pussy shit asshole smegma dookie"

I never claimed to "hate vulgarity." My actual position is that you, the FB armchair atheist, has zero tools of discourse to hold up your side of an argument. No truths, no facts, no logic, no reason. Literally all you have in your arsenal are your vulgarity and uncouth to spew at me like a mongoloid savage. Somehow you think you win arguments like that.


See Also










________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!












No comments:

Post a Comment